BACKGROUND: The complexity of Rh genetic variation among sickle cell disease (SCD) patients is high. Conventional molecular assays cannot identify all genetic variants already described for the RH locus as well as foresee novel alleles. Sequencing RHD and RHCE is indicated to broaden the search for Rh genetic variants. AIMS: To standardize the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) strategy to assertively identify Rh genetic variants among SCD patients with serologic suspicion of Rh variants and evaluate if it can improve the transfusion support. METHODS: Thirty-five SCD patients with unexplained Rh antibodies were enrolled. A NGS-based strategy was developed to genotype RHD and RHCE using gene-specific primers. Genotype and serological data were compared. RESULTS: Data obtained from the NGS-based assay were gene-specific. Ten and 25 variant RHD and RHCE alleles were identified, respectively. Among all cases of unexplained Rh antibodies, 62% had been inaccurately classified by serological analysis and, of these, 73.1% were considered as relevant, as were associated with increased risk of hemolytic reactions and shortage of units suitable for transfusion. CONCLUSION: The NGS assay designed to genotype RH coding regions was effective and accurate in identifying variants. The proposed strategy clarified the Rh phenotype of most patients, improving transfusion support.
BACKGROUND: The complexity of Rh genetic variation among sickle cell disease (SCD) patients is high. Conventional molecular assays cannot identify all genetic variants already described for the RH locus as well as foresee novel alleles. Sequencing RHD and RHCE is indicated to broaden the search for Rh genetic variants. AIMS: To standardize the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) strategy to assertively identify Rh genetic variants among SCDpatients with serologic suspicion of Rh variants and evaluate if it can improve the transfusion support. METHODS: Thirty-five SCDpatients with unexplained Rh antibodies were enrolled. A NGS-based strategy was developed to genotype RHD and RHCE using gene-specific primers. Genotype and serological data were compared. RESULTS: Data obtained from the NGS-based assay were gene-specific. Ten and 25 variant RHD and RHCE alleles were identified, respectively. Among all cases of unexplained Rh antibodies, 62% had been inaccurately classified by serological analysis and, of these, 73.1% were considered as relevant, as were associated with increased risk of hemolytic reactions and shortage of units suitable for transfusion. CONCLUSION: The NGS assay designed to genotype RH coding regions was effective and accurate in identifying variants. The proposed strategy clarified the Rh phenotype of most patients, improving transfusion support.
Authors: Thamy C Souza Silva; Bruno R Cruz; Sidneia S Costa; Akemi K Chiba; Melca M O Barros; Dante M Langhi; José O Bordin Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Carla L Dinardo; Shannon Kelly; Marcia R Dezan; Ingrid H Ribeiro; Shirley L Castilho; Luciana C Schimidt; Maria do C Valgueiro; Liliana R Preiss; Brian Custer; Ester C Sabino; Connie M Westhoff Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ti-Cheng Chang; Kelly M Haupfear; Jing Yu; Evadnie Rampersaud; Vivien A Sheehan; Jonathan M Flanagan; Jane S Hankins; Mitchell J Weiss; Gang Wu; Sunitha Vege; Connie M Westhoff; Stella T Chou; Yan Zheng Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Silja M Tammi; Wajnat A Tounsi; Susanna Sainio; Michele Kiernan; Neil D Avent; Tracey E Madgett; Katri Haimila Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-10-27