Literature DB >> 28387962

Comparative investigation of bone mineral density using CT and DEXA in a canine femoral model.

Karin Lucas1, Bernd-Arno Behrens2, Ingo Nolte1, Vladimir Galindo-Zamora3, Stefanie Betancur2, Amer Almohallami2, Anas Bouguecha2, Ayman Mostafa4, Matthias Lerch5, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman5, Patrick Wefstaedt1.   

Abstract

Bone density measurements using computed tomography (CT) instead of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) are currently of great interest in human and veterinary medical research as it would be beneficial to use CT scans obtained for other indications also for determining bone density. For Hounsfield units (HU) measured with CT in specific regions of interests (ROIs) in one or several slice/s a correlation with bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DEXA in humans and dogs of between 0.44 and 0.77 is reported in the literature. In the present study, instead certain volumes of interest (VOIs) obtained by CT scan and the corresponding HU to the respective VOIs were compared with the bone mineral density of the corresponding areas measured by DEXA. The aim of the study was to investigate whether this procedure gives more accurate information about bone density of the bones as three-dimensional objects of the respective patient. Correlation between measured HU in the respective VOI and BMD measured with DEXA in the corresponding ROI showed a very good correlation of 0.93. Linear regression with R2  = 0.85 (p = 0.0262) was calculated. Except for VOI5, similar distribution of values and significant differences (p < 0.0001-0.0087) between ROIs/VOIs were detected. Determining HU for assessing bone mineral density in a certain volume provides more accurate results than those previously reported from two-dimensional (2D) CT measurements.
© 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2667-2672, 2017. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEXA; bone mineral density; canine femur; computed tomography; volume of interest

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28387962     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  2 in total

1.  Computational tibial bone remodeling over a population after total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study.

Authors:  Thomas Anijs; Sanne Eemers; Yukihide Minoda; David Wolfson; Nico Verdonschot; Dennis Janssen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Computed Tomography Osteodensitometry for Assessment of Bone Mineral Density of the Canine Head-Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Glynn Woods; Nicolas Israeliantz Gunz; Ian Handel; Tiziana Liuti; Richard J Mellanby; Tobias Schwarz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.