Literature DB >> 28387956

Inhibition of fracture healing in the presence of contamination by Staphylococcus aureus: Effects of growth state and immune response.

Krystle A Blanchette1, Ranjani Prabhakara2, Mark E Shirtliff2, Joseph C Wenke1.   

Abstract

Extremity injuries comprise a significant portion of trauma, affecting quality of life, financial burden, and return to duty. Bacterial contamination is commonly associated with failure to heal, despite antibiotic treatment, suggesting that additional therapies must be developed to combat these complications. Treatment failure is likely due to the presence of resistant microbial communities known as biofilms. Biofilm bacteria are able to elicit a direct inhibition of healing through a multitude of known factors. However, they likely also inhibit healing through alteration of the inflammatory response. As inflammation is a critical step in fracture healing, how the presence of biofilm bacteria shifts this response to one that is suboptimal for healing is an important consideration that is currently understudied. The profile of inflammatory factors in response to biofilm bacteria is unique and distinct from those induced during normal healing or by planktonic bacteria alone. This review will examine the presence of inflammatory factors during normal healing and those induced by contaminating bacteria, and will discuss how these differences may ultimately lead to nonunion. Specifically, this review will focus on the Th1/Th2/Th17 type inflammatory responses and how shifts in the balance of these responses during infection can lead to both ineffective clearance and disruption of fracture healing.
© 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1845-1854, 2017. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biology; bone fracture; infection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28387956     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chronic Implant-Related Bone Infections-Can Immune Modulation be a Therapeutic Strategy?

Authors:  Elisabeth Seebach; Katharina F Kubatzky
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 2.  Bench-to-bedside strategies for osteoporotic fracture: From osteoimmunology to mechanosensation.

Authors:  Yong Xie; Licheng Zhang; Qi Xiong; Yanpan Gao; Wei Ge; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 3.  Microbial resistance to nanotechnologies: An important but understudied consideration using antimicrobial nanotechnologies in orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Zhuoran Wu; Brian Chan; Jessalyn Low; Justin Jang Hann Chu; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Andy Tay
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 4.  Current therapies in treatment and prevention of fracture wound biofilms: why a multifaceted approach is essential for resolving persistent infections.

Authors:  Krystle A Blanchette; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-04-12

5.  Wound Dressings Coated with Silver Nanoparticles and Essential Oils for The Management of Wound Infections.

Authors:  Bogdan Stefan Vasile; Alexandra Catalina Birca; Mihaela Carmen Musat; Alina Maria Holban
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Clinical pathologies of bone fracture modelled in zebrafish.

Authors:  Monika J Tomecka; Lalith P Ethiraj; Luis M Sánchez; Henry H Roehl; Tom J Carney
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.758

7.  Fracture biomechanics influence local and systemic immune responses in a murine fracture-related infection model.

Authors:  Marina Sabaté-Brescó; Corina M Berset; Stephan Zeiter; Barbara Stanic; Keith Thompson; Mario Ziegler; R Geoff Richards; Liam O'Mahony; T Fintan Moriarty
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.422

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.