Pieter A J G De Cock, Sven C van Dijkman1, Annick de Jaeger2, Jef Willems2, Mieke Carlier3, Alain G Verstraete3,4, Joris R Delanghe3,4, Hugo Robays5, Johan Vande Walle6, Oscar E Della Pasqua7,8,9, Peter De Paepe10. 1. Division of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Einsteinweg 55, 2333?CC Leiden, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. 5. Department of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. 6. Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. 7. Division of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, the Netherlands. 8. Clinical Pharmacology and Discovery Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK. 9. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HX, UK. 10. Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in critically ill infants and children, in order to develop an evidence-based dosing regimen. Patients and methods: This pharmacokinetic study enrolled patients admitted to the paediatric ICU for whom intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam (8:1 ratio) was indicated (75 mg/kg every 6 h based on piperacillin). Piperacillin/tazobactam concentrations were measured by an LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. Results: Piperacillin and tazobactam blood samples were collected from 47 patients (median age 2.83 years; range 2 months to 15 years). Piperacillin and tazobactam disposition was best described by a two-compartment model that included allometric scaling and a maturation function to account for the effect of growth and age. Mean clearance estimates for piperacillin and tazobactam were 4.00 and 3.01 L/h for a child of 14 kg. Monte Carlo simulations showed that an intermittent infusion of 75 mg/kg (based on piperacillin) every 4 h over 2 h, 100 mg/kg every 4 h given over 1 h or a loading dose of 75 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 300 mg/kg/24 h were the minimal requirements to achieve the therapeutic targets for piperacillin (60% f T >MIC >16 mg/L). Conclusions: Standard intermittent dosing regimens do not ensure optimal piperacillin/tazobactam exposure in critically ill patients, thereby risking treatment failure. The use of a loading dose followed by a continuous infusion is recommended for treatment of severe infections in children >2 months of age.
Objectives: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in critically ill infants and children, in order to develop an evidence-based dosing regimen. Patients and methods: This pharmacokinetic study enrolled patients admitted to the paediatric ICU for whom intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam (8:1 ratio) was indicated (75 mg/kg every 6 h based on piperacillin). Piperacillin/tazobactam concentrations were measured by an LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. Results:Piperacillin and tazobactam blood samples were collected from 47 patients (median age 2.83 years; range 2 months to 15 years). Piperacillin and tazobactam disposition was best described by a two-compartment model that included allometric scaling and a maturation function to account for the effect of growth and age. Mean clearance estimates for piperacillin and tazobactam were 4.00 and 3.01 L/h for a child of 14 kg. Monte Carlo simulations showed that an intermittent infusion of 75 mg/kg (based on piperacillin) every 4 h over 2 h, 100 mg/kg every 4 h given over 1 h or a loading dose of 75 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 300 mg/kg/24 h were the minimal requirements to achieve the therapeutic targets for piperacillin (60% f T >MIC >16 mg/L). Conclusions: Standard intermittent dosing regimens do not ensure optimal piperacillin/tazobactam exposure in critically ill patients, thereby risking treatment failure. The use of a loading dose followed by a continuous infusion is recommended for treatment of severe infections in children >2 months of age.
Authors: Dagan O Lonsdale; Emma H Baker; Karin Kipper; Charlotte Barker; Barbara Philips; Andrew Rhodes; Mike Sharland; Joseph F Standing Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Sonya Tang Girdwood; Trent Arbough; Min Dong; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Peter Tang; Alexander A Vinks; Jennifer Kaplan Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Evelyn Dhont; Tatjana Van Der Heggen; Annick De Jaeger; Johan Vande Walle; Peter De Paepe; Pieter A De Cock Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Stan J F Hartman; Roger J Brüggemann; Lynn Orriëns; Nada Dia; Michiel F Schreuder; Saskia N de Wildt Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Anders Thorsted; Anders N Kristoffersson; Sabine F Maarbjerg; Henrik Schrøder; Mikala Wang; Birgitte Brock; Elisabet I Nielsen; Lena E Friberg Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Sînziana Cristea; Elke H J Krekels; Karel Allegaert; Peter De Paepe; Annick de Jaeger; Pieter De Cock; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: AAPS J Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 4.009