BACKGROUND: Prodrug-activator gene therapy with Toca 511, a tumor-selective retroviral replicating vector (RRV) encoding yeast cytosine deaminase, is being evaluated in recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Nonlytic retroviral infection leads to permanent integration of RRV into the cancer cell genome, converting infected cancer cell and progeny into stable vector producer cells, enabling ongoing transduction and viral persistence within tumors. Cytosine deaminase in infected tumor cells converts the antifungal prodrug 5-fluorocytosine into the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil, mediating local tumor destruction without significant systemic adverse effects. METHODS: Here we investigated mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of this approach in orthotopic brain tumor models, employing both human glioma xenografts in immunodeficient hosts and syngeneic murine gliomas in immunocompetent hosts. RESULTS: In both models, a single injection of replicating vector followed by prodrug administration achieved long-term survival benefit. In the immunodeficient model, tumors recurred repeatedly, but bioluminescence imaging of tumors enabled tailored scheduling of multicycle prodrug administration, continued control of disease burden, and long-term survival. In the immunocompetent model, complete loss of tumor signal was observed after only 1-2 cycles of prodrug, followed by long-term survival without recurrence for >300 days despite discontinuation of prodrug. Long-term survivors rejected challenge with uninfected glioma cells, indicating immunological responses against native tumor antigens, and immune cell depletion showed a critical role for CD4+ T cells. CONCLUSION: These results support dual mechanisms of action contributing to the efficacy of RRV-mediated prodrug-activator gene therapy: long-term tumor control by prodrug conversion-mediated cytoreduction, and induction of antitumor immunity.
BACKGROUND: Prodrug-activator gene therapy with Toca 511, a tumor-selective retroviral replicating vector (RRV) encoding yeast cytosine deaminase, is being evaluated in recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Nonlytic retroviral infection leads to permanent integration of RRV into the cancer cell genome, converting infected cancer cell and progeny into stable vector producer cells, enabling ongoing transduction and viral persistence within tumors. Cytosine deaminase in infected tumor cells converts the antifungal prodrug 5-fluorocytosine into the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil, mediating local tumor destruction without significant systemic adverse effects. METHODS: Here we investigated mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of this approach in orthotopic brain tumor models, employing both human glioma xenografts in immunodeficient hosts and syngeneic murine gliomas in immunocompetent hosts. RESULTS: In both models, a single injection of replicating vector followed by prodrug administration achieved long-term survival benefit. In the immunodeficient model, tumors recurred repeatedly, but bioluminescence imaging of tumors enabled tailored scheduling of multicycle prodrug administration, continued control of disease burden, and long-term survival. In the immunocompetent model, complete loss of tumor signal was observed after only 1-2 cycles of prodrug, followed by long-term survival without recurrence for >300 days despite discontinuation of prodrug. Long-term survivors rejected challenge with uninfected glioma cells, indicating immunological responses against native tumor antigens, and immune cell depletion showed a critical role for CD4+ T cells. CONCLUSION: These results support dual mechanisms of action contributing to the efficacy of RRV-mediated prodrug-activator gene therapy: long-term tumor control by prodrug conversion-mediated cytoreduction, and induction of antitumor immunity.
Prodrug-activator gene therapy with an RRV, Toca 511, has shown promising evidence of
clinical benefit, radiographic responses, and increased survival in multicenter
first-in-human phase I dose-escalation trials for recurrent high-grade glioma, and a phase
IIB/III registrational trial is now under way. This study improves our understanding of
mechanisms of action underlying the therapeutic efficacy of this approach, by
demonstrating through real-time optical imaging that persistent infection by Toca 511
achieves long-term disease control through repeated cycles of prodrug-activated tumor mass
reduction after a single virus injection in immunodeficient human glioma models.
Furthermore, despite the low intrinsic immunogenicity of RRV, we definitively demonstrate
for the first time that long-term cellular antitumor immunity develops after Toca
511–mediated prodrug-activator gene therapy in immunocompetent syngeneic glioma models.
Together with its companion paper (Mitchell et al), this study provides an important
conceptual foundation for developing further immunotherapeutic strategies with RRV.Unique among replicating viruses being developed as anticancer agents, retroviral replicating
vectors (RRVs) maintain viral persistence in tumors through the combined characteristics of
nonlytic replication, stable integration into the cancer cell genome, and reduced viral
immunogenicity.[1-3] RRVs lack signals
for active uptake into nuclei in quiescent cells and integrate into the host genome only when
the nuclear membrane dissolves during mitosis[4]; they are highly restricted in normal tissues by innate and adaptive immune
mechanisms, which are generally inactive in tumors.[5,6] In pre-established
intracranial glioma models, tumor-selective viral replication enables RRVs to achieve up to
>98% transduction throughout entire tumor masses within a few weeks after injection at
multiplicities of infection (MOI; ie, virus to glioma cell ratios) as low as 0.01.[7-12] In contrast, tumor transduction levels
were ≤1% after injecting the same dose of conventional nonreplicating retroviral
vectors.[7,13]While not intrinsically cytolytic, RRVs can be engineered with a prodrug-activator gene such
as yeast cytosine deaminase (yCD), which generates 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) directly within
cancer cells from its precursor 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC), an antifungal agent approved for
clinical use and commonly used to treat CNS fungus infections.[7,8] For clinical
use, we developed a new RRV construct, Toca 511 (vocimagene amiretrorepvec),
containing genome-stabilizing modifications in the virus backbone and a
codon-optimized/temperature-stabilized yCD transgene.[14] Toca 511 and Toca FC (extended release formulation of 5-FC) have been
evaluated in first-in-human clinical trials of RRV-mediated prodrug-activator gene therapy in
patients with recurrent high-grade glioma, with the vector administered via different routes
of administration (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01156584, NCT01470794, NCT01985256). To date, the
treatment has been well tolerated and shows promising signs of clinical benefit, radiological
responses, and increased survival compared with historical controls,[15-17] and an international phase IIB/III randomized trial in
recurrent high-grade glioma is now under way (NCT02414165).In the present study, we further investigated mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy
of Toca 511 followed by 5-FC (Toca 511+5-FC) in intracranial xenograft models of human glioma
and syngeneic models of murine glioma. Previous studies in immunodeficient models had
indicated that long-term tumor control could be achieved but was dependent upon continued
administration of prodrug using a cyclic dosing schedule.[7,8] In contrast,
prodrug could be discontinued after a few cycles without further recurrence in immunocompetent
syngeneic models.[9] However, the
equivalence of these models in terms of virus replication kinetics and transduction efficiency
had not been established, and the specific role of the immune system in contributing to
therapeutic efficacy has not been evaluated to date. As noted, RRV itself is not highly
immunogenic, and in fact is capable of suppressing interferon signaling.[3] Hence, to date, it has not been clear whether
RRV could activate antitumor immune responses.Our present results now definitively demonstrate that the therapeutic efficacy of direct
tumor cell killing after Toca 511+5-FC treatment, as demonstrated in the immunodeficient tumor
model, is significantly augmented by induction of anticancer immunity in the immunocompetent
tumor model. In the accompanying manuscript (Mitchell et al), we further investigate the
mechanisms by which antitumor immune responses are generated. Taken together, our results
indicate that repeated cycles of intratumoral prodrug conversion by RRV not only achieves
long-term disease control but, through local “bystander effects” on immunosuppressive tumor
stroma, also permits development of durable cellular immune responses directed against
endogenous tumor antigens, contributing to apparent complete eradication of residual
disease.
Materials and Methods
Please see the Supplementary material for additional details.
Cell Culture
The human glioma cell line U-87MG (American Type Culture Collection) and the mouse glioma
cell line Tu-2449 were cultured as previously described.[8-11,18]
Viral Vector Plasmids
Plasmids encoding RRV (pAC3-GFP, pAC3-yCD2 [Toca 511]; Fig.
1A) and lentiviral vector pRRL-sin-cPPT-hCMV-FLuc2 have been described
previously.[14,19]
Fig. 1
Vector design, replication, and functionality. (A) Design of RRV AC3-GFP and Toca
511. Proviral versions of these vectors are shown; U3/R/U5, domains of viral long
terminal repeat; gag/pol/ampho env, viral coding sequences. (B) Replication kinetics
of Toca 511 in glioma cell lines. U-87 and Tu-2449 (4 × 105) cells were
infected with Toca 511 (5 × 103 TU / 5 µL, MOI 0.005) on day 0. Infected
cells were analyzed for integrated viral copy number by genomic qPCR every third day
after virus infection. (C) MTS assay to assess 5-FC drug cytotoxicity. U-87 and
Tu-2449 were fully transduced with AC3-GFP or Toca 511 before plating. Cell viability
was measured by MTS dye conversion after exposure to 5-FC at the indicated
concentrations, and normalized to nontreated cells. Note: “No vector” almost
completely coincides with “AC3-GFP” for both cell lines.
Vector design, replication, and functionality. (A) Design of RRV AC3-GFP and Toca
511. Proviral versions of these vectors are shown; U3/R/U5, domains of viral long
terminal repeat; gag/pol/ampho env, viral coding sequences. (B) Replication kinetics
of Toca 511 in glioma cell lines. U-87 and Tu-2449 (4 × 105) cells were
infected with Toca 511 (5 × 103 TU / 5 µL, MOI 0.005) on day 0. Infected
cells were analyzed for integrated viral copy number by genomic qPCR every third day
after virus infection. (C) MTS assay to assess 5-FC drug cytotoxicity. U-87 and
Tu-2449 were fully transduced with AC3-GFP or Toca 511 before plating. Cell viability
was measured by MTS dye conversion after exposure to 5-FC at the indicated
concentrations, and normalized to nontreated cells. Note: “No vector” almost
completely coincides with “AC3-GFP” for both cell lines.
Replication Kinetics of RRV In Vitro
AC3-GFP or Toca 511 was used for infection of U-87 or Tu-2449 cells at MOI of 0.005 with
Polybrene (Sigma). At serial time points, viral copy number was determined by genomic
quantitative (q)PCR. As nonreplicating controls, 50 µmol 3ʹ-azide-3ʹ-deoxythymidine (AZT)
was added to the culture medium to prevent virus spread.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis
Quantitative analysis of RRV copy number in the infected cells was performed as described
previously[19] (see also the
Supplementary material).
Cytotoxicity Assay In Vitro
To assess drug cytotoxicity, cell viability was determined using
3-(4-5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxy phenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium
(MTS) assay (Promega) in triplicate 96-well plates cultured with various concentrations of
5-FC. Cytotoxicity was determined by calculation of the absorbance of viable cells as
measured against wells without 5-FC on day 9.
Prodrug-Activator Gene Therapy in Intracranial Tumor Models
All animal protocols and experiments were approved by the UCLA or Explora institutional
animal care and use committees. Six- to 8-week-old female nude mice (Hsd:Athymic
Nude-Foxn1nu; Envigo) or B6C3F1/J mice (Jackson Laboratory) were bred
and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. To establish intracranial gliomas,
U-87 (1 × 105) or Tu-2449 (1 × 104) cells were stereotactically
injected into the right frontal lobe in mice, as described previously.[8] In U-87 tumor models, Toca 511 (low dose:
3.4 × 104 transducing units [TU] or high dose: 2 × 106 TU) was given
by stereotactic injection on day 5, and daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of
5-FC (500 mg/kg once daily or twice daily) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was started
on day 18 for 7 consecutive days. This 7-day cycle was repeated at intervals of every 1–2
weeks. In Tu-2449 tumor model studies conducted at UCLA, Toca 511 (2 × 106 TU)
was given by stereotactic injection on day 4, and daily i.p. administration of 5-FC or PBS
was started on day 10 for 7 consecutive days. This cycle was repeated at intervals of
every 10 days. In independent Tu-2449 studies conducted at Tocagen, Toca 511 was
administered as above at 3 × 106 TU followed by 4 cycles of 5-FC administered
twice a day for 4 days every 2 weeks, or at a lower dose (1.6 × 104 TU), and
continuous 5-FC administered once a day for 14 or 21 consecutive days.
Optical Imaging Analysis
Bioluminescent signals were analyzed 5 min after administration of D-luciferin (126
mg/kg, i.p.) in anesthetized mice, with a 1 min acquisition time on a charge-coupled
camera system (IVIS Lumina II, Caliper Life Sciences) with Living Image software.
Tumor Rechallenge and Immunological Assays
Tumor rechallenge was performed on all cured mice from intracranial Tu-2449 tumor
long-term survival studies, by subcutaneous inoculation with uninfected Tu-2449SC cells on
day 0 (= days 105, 182, and 303 after initial tumor establishment, respectively) at low (1
× 105) or high (2 × 106) cell doses, and tumor growth was measured
twice a week.For enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay, purified splenocytes were
stimulated with anti-CD3 and recombinant human interleukin 2 (rhIL-2) (100 U/mL) and
plated in the Mouse IFN-γ [interferon gamma] ELISPOT Kit (1 × 104 cells/well;
BD Bioscience) and the number of IFN-γ–producing cells counted with an ELISPOT plate
reader (CTL Laboratories) at the Immuno/BioSpot and Cytometrics Core, UCLA.Lymphocyte subset depletions were performed by i.p. injection of 50 µg anti-CD4 (GK1.5)
or anti-CD8 (2.43), or 25 µg anti-NK1.1 (PK136) antibodies (Bio X Cell) on days −1, 1, 3,
and then twice a week, in previously cured animals. Depletion was verified by
immunophenotyping splenocytes from one animal from each group on days −1 and 8 before and
after rechallenge.
xCELLigence Analysis
Cytotoxicity of stimulated versus unstimulated splenocytes, from previously cured mice or
naïve B6C3F1/J mice, respectively, against Tu-2449SC cells was determined by xCELLigence
analysis (ACEA Biosciences) (see also the Supplementary material). For an immune boost,
previously cured mice were subcutaneously rechallenged with Tu-2449SC cells on day 0. On
day 8, harvested splenocytes from immune-boosted cured mice were cultured without rhIL-2
overnight, then plated in triplicate with target cells on E-Plate 96 at several
effector-to-target ratios. Up to 400 sweeps were run at 2-min intervals until data
collection 24 h later.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and 1-way or
2-way ANOVA. Survival data were analyzed according to the Kaplan–Meier method.
P-values of <.05 were considered statistically significant in all
analyses, performed with GraphPad Prism 5 software.
Results
RRVs Mediate Efficient Delivery and Functional Expression of Yeast Cytosine Deaminase
Transgene in Glioma Cells
In preliminary studies, AC3-GFP, an RRV expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP)
reporter gene (Fig. 1A), was used to evaluate the
equivalence of RRV replication and gene transfer efficiency in vitro in both human U-87
and murine Tu-2449 glioma cells. In both cell lines, RRV transduction levels increased
from 0.5% to >90% within 5–10 days in vitro, and stably maintained 1–2 integrated
vector copies per cell (Supplementary Fig. S1).We employed Toca 511 (AC3-yCD2),[14]
a vector designed for clinical use which expresses an improved yCD2 prodrug-activator gene
(Fig. 1A). To evaluate possible differences in
replication kinetics between AC3-GFP and Toca 511, we also analyzed the integrated vector
copy number by genomic qPCR analysis of cells initially infected with Toca 511 at an MOI
of 0.005, using primers targeting the amphotropic envelope gene, at serial time points
after infection in the presence or absence of AZT in vitro. In both U-87 and Tu-2449
glioma cells, the time course of changes in Toca 511 vector copy numbers was similar to
that of AC3-GFP, showing an initial rapid increase followed by gradual decrease to a
plateau level (Fig. 1B). In U-87 human glioma cells,
the vector copy number increased rapidly to reach >10 copies/cell by day 6, followed by
gradual decrease to plateau at ~2 copies/cell within 15 days. In Tu-2449 murine glioma
cells, the viral copy number increased rapidly to reach >4 copies/cell within 9 days,
followed by a gradual decrease to plateau at ~3 copies/cell within 15 days.As the CD enzyme converts the well-tolerated prodrug 5-FC into the antimetabolite 5-FU
intracellularly within infected cancer cells, in vitro cytotoxicity was examined after
exposure of fully transduced glioma cells to 5-FC at various concentrations (Fig. 1C). Control U-87 cells transduced with AC3-GFP or
no vector showed no loss of viability at concentrations of 5-FC up to 10 mM 5-FC
treatment. In contrast, the viability of Toca 511 transduced cells was reduced to below
40% even after exposure to only 0.1 mM 5-FC, and complete cell killing was observed after
9 days of exposure to 10 mM 5-FC. Similar results were obtained in Tu-2449 cells
transduced with the Toca 511 vector. Control Tu-2449 cells showed no loss of viability up
to concentrations of 1 mM, whereas the viability of Toca 511 transduced cells was reduced
over 70% even after exposure to only 0.01 mM of 5-FC, and 95% cell killing was achieved at
1 mM 5-FC.
Toca 511 and Cyclic 5-FC Achieve Long-Term Survival in Intracranial Glioma
Models
We previously showed in the intracranial U-87 xenograft model in athymic mice that a
single dose of a preclinical prototype RRV expressing the CD prodrug-activator gene
followed by continuous administration of 5-FC for over 2 weeks resulted in doubling of
median survival time, but animals all eventually succumbed to tumor recurrence.[8] In contrast, multiple cycles of 5-FC
could achieve prolonged survival, which we have now confirmed using the clinical vector
Toca 511. After establishment of intracranial U-87 gliomas, 2 × 106 TU of Toca
511 was given by stereotactic injection at the same coordinates, and multicycle daily 5-FC
prodrug treatment was commenced on day 18 for 7 consecutive days at intervals of 1–2
weeks. As expected, none of the mice in the control groups, either untreated or treated
with vector only without prodrug, survived longer than 38 days. In contrast, the group
treated with Toca 511+5-FC showed significant survival benefit (P <
.0001) and 87.5% survival for over 120 days (Fig.
2A).
Fig. 2
Survival benefit of RRV gene therapy in intracranial glioma models. (A) U-87 model.
Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased survival compared with control groups
(87.5% survival for >120 days; P < .0001). Shaded areas: daily
5-FC cycles. (B–D) Tu-2449 models. (B) Low dose: 1.6 × 104 TU. Daily 5-FC
was commenced continuously on day 10 for either 14 or 21 consecutive days (Toca
511+5-FC × 14 or 21). Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased survival compared
with Toca 511+PBS (40% survival for >240 days; P < .005).
Hatched area: daily 5-FC × 14 days, shaded area: daily 5-FC × 21 days. (C) High dose:
3 × 106 TU. Twice-daily 5-FC was commenced on day 10 for 4 consecutive days
at 2-week intervals (Toca 511+5-FC). Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased
survival compared with Toca 511+PBS (82% survival for >160 days; P
< .0001). Gray areas: twice-daily 5-FC cycles. (D) High dose: 2 × 106
TU. Daily 5-FC was commenced on day 10 for 7 consecutive days at 10-day intervals
(Toca 511+5-FC). Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased survival compared with
control groups (100% survival for >300 days; P < .0001). Gray
areas: daily 5-FC cycles.
Survival benefit of RRV gene therapy in intracranial glioma models. (A) U-87 model.
Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased survival compared with control groups
(87.5% survival for >120 days; P < .0001). Shaded areas: daily
5-FC cycles. (B–D) Tu-2449 models. (B) Low dose: 1.6 × 104 TU. Daily 5-FC
was commenced continuously on day 10 for either 14 or 21 consecutive days (Toca
511+5-FC × 14 or 21). Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased survival compared
with Toca 511+PBS (40% survival for >240 days; P < .005).
Hatched area: daily 5-FC × 14 days, shaded area: daily 5-FC × 21 days. (C) High dose:
3 × 106 TU. Twice-daily 5-FC was commenced on day 10 for 4 consecutive days
at 2-week intervals (Toca 511+5-FC). Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased
survival compared with Toca 511+PBS (82% survival for >160 days; P
< .0001). Gray areas: twice-daily 5-FC cycles. (D) High dose: 2 × 106
TU. Daily 5-FC was commenced on day 10 for 7 consecutive days at 10-day intervals
(Toca 511+5-FC). Toca 511+5-FC showed significantly increased survival compared with
control groups (100% survival for >300 days; P < .0001). Gray
areas: daily 5-FC cycles.We then evaluated the survival of Toca 511+5-FC in intracranial Tu-2449 syngeneic models
in immunocompetent B6C3F1/J mice. Tu-2449, derived from a spontaneous tumor in
GFAP-v-src-transgenic mice, has morphological features and growth
characteristics reminiscent of human gliomas.[20,21] In previous studies, we
found that Toca 511+5-FC could achieve eradication of intracranial Tu-2449 tumors in
syngeneic hosts,[9] but not in
immunodeficient hosts.[11]We hypothesized that local intratumoral production of 5-FU avoids drug-induced
myelosuppression as seen with systemic 5-FU treatment, thereby permitting induction of
antitumor immune responses. However, while the 5-FC prodrug itself is well tolerated in
humans and only extended high-level exposure can result in clinically relevant
myelotoxicity, it is also possible that prolonged production of 5-FU from the tumor might
be counterproductive.Therefore we investigated different dosing regimens for efficacy and induction of
antitumor immunity. First, we examined Toca 511 at a low dose (104 TU),
followed by continuous daily 5-FC for 14 or 21 days. This is equivalent to the dose used
in previous U-87 studies with the preclinical vector followed by continuous 5-FC, and as
there is a dose response effect for Toca 511 in the Tu-2449 model, this lower vector dose
enables us to see either improvement or detriment compared with our previous 5-FC dosing
regimens. Results in Fig. 2B show that these
continuous dosing regimens give similar outcomes: significantly improved survival compared
with controls (P < .005) and 40% survival for >240 days after a
continuous 14- or 21-day single course of 5-FC. It should be noted that long-term survival
is significantly improved compared with that seen after the equivalent dose of virus
followed by continuous 5-FC in the U-87 model,[8] again suggesting the critical role of an intact immune system in
achieving long-term survival, and indicating that the 5-FC dosing regimen or Toca 511 dose
can impact induction of antitumor immunity.We next investigated a shorter and more intense cyclic dosing regimen with high dose Toca
511 (3 × 106 TU) followed by 5-FC for twice-daily 4-day cycles, spaced 10 days
apart. This regimen also results in significantly improved survival compared with controls
(P < .0001) and 82% survival for >160 days without further
prodrug treatment after 4 cycles (Fig. 2C). Notably,
previously published results from a 4-day on/10-day off dosing regimen using a lower dose
of virus also showed long-term survival benefit, but in a lower percentage of
animals,[9] again suggesting that
the initial effectiveness of prodrug-activator gene therapy may impact subsequent
development of antitumor immunity.Finally, we evaluated the survival of prodrug-activator gene therapy in the Tu-2449 model
using the same cyclic 5-FC dosing regimen employed in the U-87 studies described above,
that is, 2 × 106 TU Toca 511 injected into pre-established intracranial tumors
followed by daily 5-FC prodrug treatment for 7 days at 1- to 2-week intervals. As
expected, both control groups (no vector and Toca 511 followed by saline vehicle instead
of 5-FC) showed similar results and did not survive beyond 28 days. However, the group
treated with Toca 511 plus 5-FC for 7-day cycles showed significantly longer survival than
control groups (P < .0001), achieving 100% survival for over 360 days
even without further prodrug treatment after the third cycle (Fig. 2D).
In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Tumor Response to Toca 511 and Multicycle
5-FC
To enable real-time assessment of the therapeutic effect of Toca 511 followed by
multicycle 5-FC in individual animals, U-87 and Tu-2449 cells used in the optimized cyclic
5-FC studies above were pre-transduced with a replication-defective lentivirus vector
expressing firefly luciferase. Stable expression of luciferase in these cells was
confirmed by optical imaging in vitro (Fig. 3A),
which showed a quantitative correlation between cell number and luminescent signal
intensity (Supplementary Fig. S2). After intratumoral injection of Toca 511 into
established U-87 intracranial gliomas, each mouse was analyzed by optical imaging weekly.
In both tumor models, control mice that received saline instead of 5-FC showed tumor
progression, as evidenced by increasing bioluminescence signal intensities. However,
animals treated with Toca 511 followed by 5-FC exhibited stable disease or decreased tumor
burden, and overall, average tumor growth was significantly inhibited compared with
control groups after the initial cycle of 5-FC treatment in both U-87 (P
< .0001) and Tu-2449 (P < .0001) tumor models (Fig. 3BC, Supplementary Fig. S3).
Fig. 3
Bioluminescence imaging of tumor responses in vivo. Luciferase-marked U-87 and
Tu-2449 gliomas were monitored by bioluminescence imaging in vivo. (A) Representative
examples comparing imaging signals and hematoxylin and eosin–stained brain sections
from the same animal. (B and C, upper panels) Imaging results from representative
animals bearing U-87 (B) or Tu-2449 (C) intracranial tumors at different time points
(Fig. 2A and D). (B and C, lower panels) Signal intensities (photons/sec/mouse) from each
animal at different time points. (D) qPCR analysis to detect luciferase sequences from
residual tumor cells in brain after Toca 511+5-FC in Tu-2449 model on day 361 (Fig. 2D). Detection limit was determined based on
background signal from naïve Tu-2449 cells. Copy number/cell equivalent = luciferase
copy number/1 × 105 cell genomes based on mouse β-actin copy number.
Bioluminescence imaging of tumor responses in vivo. Luciferase-marked U-87 and
Tu-2449 gliomas were monitored by bioluminescence imaging in vivo. (A) Representative
examples comparing imaging signals and hematoxylin and eosin–stained brain sections
from the same animal. (B and C, upper panels) Imaging results from representative
animals bearing U-87 (B) or Tu-2449 (C) intracranial tumors at different time points
(Fig. 2A and D). (B and C, lower panels) Signal intensities (photons/sec/mouse) from each
animal at different time points. (D) qPCR analysis to detect luciferase sequences from
residual tumor cells in brain after Toca 511+5-FC in Tu-2449 model on day 361 (Fig. 2D). Detection limit was determined based on
background signal from naïve Tu-2449 cells. Copy number/cell equivalent = luciferase
copy number/1 × 105 cell genomes based on mouse β-actin copy number.Subsequently, in the U-87 human glioma xenograft tumor model, the Toca 511+5-FC treated
mice repeatedly showed reemergence of increased luminescence signal intensities during
intervals between 5-FC treatment cycles, indicating tumor recurrence upon cessation of
prodrug treatment after each cycle (Fig. 3B).
Increased tumor burden as indicated by luminescence imaging was associated with
characteristic behavioral changes, including hunched posture and reduced feeding and
grooming activity, while reduction of tumor burden with each prodrug cycle restored normal
activity without obvious ill effects. Thus, with repeated cycles of prodrug treatment,
long-term tumor control was possible without incurring any adverse effects.Consistent with imaging results, qPCR for both human genomic and RRV sequences showed
residual signals in brain tissues in this immunodeficient model, supporting the existence
of a reservoir of stably infected glioma cells enabling continued therapeutic benefit with
prodrug administration upon tumor recurrence for at least 125 days until study termination
(Supplementary Fig. S4).In contrast, in the immunocompetent Tu-2449 model, bioluminescent signals of all treated
tumors decreased rapidly after the initial cycle of 5-FC prodrug, stayed below detection
threshold after the second cycle, and never recurred even without further prodrug
treatment after the third cycle (Fig. 3C). At the
molecular level, firefly luciferase and RRV sequences were both undetectable by qPCR
analysis of brain tissues from long-term surviving animals even 280 days after the last
prodrug injection (ie, at study termination on day 361 after initial tumor establishment)
(Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. S4).
Immunological Memory Induced in Long-Term Survivors After Toca 511+5-FC
Treatment
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens are not highly expressed on Tu-2449 cells
at baseline, but MHC class I expression is upregulated by IFN-γ (Supplementary Fig. S5).
Accordingly, tumor engraftment is robust in naïve syngeneic hosts, but pre-immunization
leads to rejection,[21] indicating
that antitumor immunity can be elicited in this model. To evaluate whether antitumor
immunity had developed in immunocompetent hosts with Tu-2449 intracranial gliomas after
administration of different dosing regimens, we challenged surviving animals
subcutaneously with a low dose (1 × 105) of uninfected Tu-2449SC cells
(previously passaged as subcutaneous tumors) at earlier time points post-establishment of
the original intracranial tumors (Fig. 4A). Some mice
that had shown long-term survival with low-dose Toca 511/continuous 5-FC (Fig. 2B) completely controlled growth of subcutaneous tumors (4/8
treated vs 0/4 control) after rechallenge on day 105, although the mean tumor volume
difference did not reach significance (Fig. 4B).
However, mice that had been cured of brain tumor after receiving high-dose Toca 511/cyclic
5-FC (Fig. 2C) showed significant inhibition of
subcutaneous tumor growth after rechallenge on day 182, compared with naïve animals
(P < .005, Fig. 4B). To further
evaluate the durability of antitumor immunity, we challenged cured mice after high dose
Toca 511/cyclic 5-FC with a higher inoculum (2 × 106) of uninfected Tu-2449SC
cells (ie, uninfected with either RRV or lentiviral luciferase marking vector) on day 303
post-original tumor implantation (Fig. 4A). Tumors
successfully engrafted in all control animals, which had not previously been exposed to
Tu-2449 tumors and were naïve to any prior treatment. In contrast, in the previously cured
mice, although subcutaneous tumors were observed initially on day 7 after challenge, these
tumors all spontaneously disappeared by day 14 without recurrence (Fig. 4C).
Fig. 4
Tumor rechallenge studies. (A) Timeline of tumor rechallenge. Long-term survivors
from intracranial Tu-2449 tumor studies (Fig.
2B–D) were subcutaneously inoculated with uninfected parental Tu-2449SC cells
on day 0 (= days 105, 182, and 303 after initial tumor establishment, respectively) at
low (1 × 105) or high (2 × 106) cell doses. As controls,
Tu-2449SC cells were implanted into naïve B6C3F1/J mice. (B) Tu-2449SC tumor growth
after low dose challenge (1 × 105 cells) in previously cured mice at early
time points (day 105 or day 182, respectively) after continuous 5-FC or 4-day cyclic
5-FC regimens (Fig. 2B, C). Open circles: naïve controls. Closed triangles: cured mice
from Fig. 2B. Closed circles: cured mice from
Fig. 2C. Tumor growth was significantly
inhibited in mice cured of gliomas with high-dose Toca 511 and cyclic 5-FC, compared
with naïve controls (P = .0004). (C) Tu-2449SC cells (2 ×
106 cells) implanted in naïve versus previously cured mice (from Fig. 2D) at a late time point (day 303) after 7-day
cyclic 5-FC regimen. Tumors spontaneously regressed in cured mice (P
= .0008). Open circles: naïve controls. Closed circles: cured mice.
Tumor rechallenge studies. (A) Timeline of tumor rechallenge. Long-term survivors
from intracranial Tu-2449 tumor studies (Fig.
2B–D) were subcutaneously inoculated with uninfected parental Tu-2449SC cells
on day 0 (= days 105, 182, and 303 after initial tumor establishment, respectively) at
low (1 × 105) or high (2 × 106) cell doses. As controls,
Tu-2449SC cells were implanted into naïve B6C3F1/J mice. (B) Tu-2449SC tumor growth
after low dose challenge (1 × 105 cells) in previously cured mice at early
time points (day 105 or day 182, respectively) after continuous 5-FC or 4-day cyclic
5-FC regimens (Fig. 2B, C). Open circles: naïve controls. Closed triangles: cured mice
from Fig. 2B. Closed circles: cured mice from
Fig. 2C. Tumor growth was significantly
inhibited in mice cured of gliomas with high-dose Toca 511 and cyclic 5-FC, compared
with naïve controls (P = .0004). (C) Tu-2449SC cells (2 ×
106 cells) implanted in naïve versus previously cured mice (from Fig. 2D) at a late time point (day 303) after 7-day
cyclic 5-FC regimen. Tumors spontaneously regressed in cured mice (P
= .0008). Open circles: naïve controls. Closed circles: cured mice.Cellular immunity was evaluated in splenocyte populations obtained from these previously
cured mice by measuring the number of IFN-γ producing cells with ELISPOT assay. Target
cell–stimulated IFN-γ responses of splenocytes derived from cured mice were significantly
higher than splenocytes obtained from naïve control mice (P = .0005;
Fig. 5A). Furthermore, mixed lymphocyte–target cell
reactions using splenocytes from previously cured animals, monitored by xCELLigence
electrical impedance analysis, showed progressive killing of Tu-2449 target cells over
time in an effector:target ratio–dependent manner, compared with splenocytes from naïve
mice (Fig. 5B, C), and were similar to those obtained after stimulating splenocytes from naïve
animals with INF-γ treated Tu-2449 cells (Supplementary Fig. S6). Taken together, these
results indicate that RRV-mediated prodrug-activator gene therapy stimulated endogenous
antitumor responses that could be reactivated >300 days later.
Fig. 5
Cured animals show T cell–mediated antitumor responses. (A) ELISPOT assay
quantitating the number of IFN-γ–producing cells per 104 splenocytes from
cured mice in Fig. 2D versus naïve controls. (B,
C) xCELLigence real-time cell impedance analysis showed effector cell dose-dependent
antitumor activity of splenocytes from previously cured, immune-boosted mice against
Tu-2449SC target cells at the effector:target (E:T) ratios shown (10:1, 30:1, 50:1).
Results are shown as (B) real-time target cell growth curves, and (C) cell growth
inhibition index values at the terminal 24-hour post-incubation time point, normalized
to baseline values from wells plated with target cells only.
Cured animals show T cell–mediated antitumor responses. (A) ELISPOT assay
quantitating the number of IFN-γ–producing cells per 104 splenocytes from
cured mice in Fig. 2D versus naïve controls. (B,
C) xCELLigence real-time cell impedance analysis showed effector cell dose-dependent
antitumor activity of splenocytes from previously cured, immune-boosted mice against
Tu-2449SC target cells at the effector:target (E:T) ratios shown (10:1, 30:1, 50:1).
Results are shown as (B) real-time target cell growth curves, and (C) cell growth
inhibition index values at the terminal 24-hour post-incubation time point, normalized
to baseline values from wells plated with target cells only.Specific lymphocyte subsets that contribute to tumor eradication upon tumor rechallenge
were assessed by antibody-mediated depletion of CD4+, CD8+, and natural killer (NK) cells.
Depletion was verified by flow cytometry of splenocytes isolated from a randomly selected
animal from each depletion group, and tumor establishment versus rejection was compared
between lymphocyte subset–depleted groups and nondepleted controls. Notably, tumors were
still rejected in all previously cured animals subjected to NK or CD8+ T-cell depletion,
as in nondepleted controls. In contrast, CD4+ T-cell or combination CD4+/CD8+ T-cell
depletion prevented tumor rejection in previously cured animals (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6
Lymphocyte depletion prevents tumor rejection in previously cured animals. Cured mice
from Fig. 2D were injected with anti-CD4 and/or
anti-CD8, or anti-NK antibodies for immunocyte depletion prior to subcutaneous
challenge with parental Tu-2449SC cells. Tumor measurements were performed twice a
week.
Lymphocyte depletion prevents tumor rejection in previously cured animals. Cured mice
from Fig. 2D were injected with anti-CD4 and/or
anti-CD8, or anti-NK antibodies for immunocyte depletion prior to subcutaneous
challenge with parental Tu-2449SC cells. Tumor measurements were performed twice a
week.
Discussion
The present studies underscore the advantages of RRV therapy, which integrates a
prodrug-activator transgene into the cancer cell genome nonlytically, thereby converting
infected cancer cells permanently into virus-producing cells. Previous studies relied solely
on survival and endpoint immunohistochemical analyses to evaluate the efficacy of multicycle
prodrug treatment in intracranial brain tumor models.[8-11] This represents the first study to monitor
RRV-mediated prodrug-activator gene therapy in intracranial glioma models using
bioluminescence optical imaging, which allowed more detailed assessments of tumor response
to each cycle of treatment by sequentially visualizing and quantifying tumor burden in the
same individual over time, and by qPCR analysis for sensitive detection of residual
disease.In the U-87 immunodeficient intracranial tumor model, the group treated with Toca 511+5-FC
showed a significant reduction of tumor burden compared with control groups after the
initial cycle of 5-FC. However, bioluminescence imaging revealed the ongoing presence of
residual disease, resulting in periodic tumor recurrence, and variable responses to repeated
5-FC were observed in individual animals (ie, tumor responses were either attenuated, lost,
or recovered).Theoretically, response to prodrug treatment depends on the number of RRV-transduced tumor
cells undergoing division at the time of prodrug administration. Although transduction
efficiencies were relatively uniform among infected tumors at the initial cycle of 5-FC
treatment, variation in the number of residual infected cells at later time points may have
caused variations in response to prodrug treatment. Nonetheless, relatively consistent
control of tumor burden could be achieved over long durations with continued prodrug cycles,
although not completely eliminated.Viral replication kinetics and overall transduction levels were confirmed to be relatively
equivalent between U-87 and Tu-2449 models. However, with optimal vector dose and prodrug
scheduling in the Tu-2449 model, intracranial tumor signals became undetectable, without
recurrence even upon cessation of prodrug, and tumor eradication was confirmed by qPCR
analysis for residual tumor cells in brain tissues from long-term survivors. An obvious
difference between these models is the presence of a functioning cellular immune system in
the immunocompetent syngeneic host. As noted, previous studies showed that Toca 511+5-FC was
not curative in intracranial Tu-2449 models established in immunodeficient mice.[11] Furthermore, baseline levels of MHC
expression are low in Tu-2449 cells in the absence of IFN-γ (Supplementary Fig. S7), and
intact RRVs cause inhibition of type I interferon responses,[3] so it was not clear whether antitumor immunity would
develop after RRV-mediated gene therapy in this model.In fact, our results indicate that the strong therapeutic efficacy with apparent tumor
clearance observed in the immunocompetent model was achieved not only by cytoreduction, but
also by the development of antitumor immune responses. Once denatured, RRV particles show
immunostimulatory activity[3] and hence
may act as an adjuvant. Uninfected parental tumor cells were used to rechallenge long-term
survivors after Toca 511+5-FC, so the rejection responses observed were not directed against
viral or luciferase reporter epitopes, but presumably against endogenous tumor antigens
released by Toca 511+5-FC–induced cell killing.ELISPOT and xCELLigence assays confirmed the presence of cellular immunity against the
parental tumor cells. As this was observed in animals that had survived for over 300 days
without further prodrug treatment beyond the third cycle, these responses may be mediated by
memory T cells. Notably, lymphocyte subset–depletion studies demonstrated that CD4+ T cells
were required for tumor rejection, while NK and CD8+ cell depletion did not abrogate
rejection. Recent data indicate the importance of CD4+ T effector cells in antitumor and
antiviral immunity, and CD4+ cells may be even more efficient as cytolytic effectors than
CD8+ cells, even with MHC class II–negative cancer cell targets.[22] It has also recently been reported that cytolytic CD4+
and CD8+ T cells can cooperatively attack retrovirus-infected cells,[23] as also suggested by the data from our studies
suggesting that depletion of both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets together was more effective in
inhibiting tumor rejection than depletion of CD4+ cells alone. While Tu-2449 cells do not
appear to express class II MHC (Supplementary Fig. S5), it has been reported that CD4+ T
cells may exert class II–unrestricted cytolytic effects via Fas signaling.[24] An alternative possibility is that class
II–negative tumor cells are killed by CD4+ Th1 cell-dependent IFN-γ stimulated M1-like
macrophages.[25] Of note, detailed
studies of intratumoral cell populations show reduction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells
and initial reduction followed by increased percentage of CD4+ cells overall, but with
reduced Th2 and Th17 subsets, after Toca 511+5-FC treatment in Tu-2449 subcutaneous tumor
models (Mitchell et al, accompanying manuscript).In previous studies, a dose-response effect was noted, with fewer animals showing long-term
survival with lower vector doses,[9]
suggesting a threshold for effective RRV infection. However, in the present studies
employing high-dose vector, therapeutic results were robust with respect to 5-FC dosing
schedules, as either daily 7-day cycles or twice-a-day 4-day cycles showed similar survival
and tumor rejection. Furthermore, while longer-term continuous 5-FC dosing yielded some
long-term survivors, cyclic 5-FC dosing schedules resulting in intermittent release of tumor
antigens may be more effective at inducing long-term immune memory, analogous to prime-boost
vaccination.In summary, one major advantage of the use of a replicative integrating vector compared
with other virotherapies is the ability to trigger repeated cycles of cytoreduction by
systemic administration of a well-tolerated prodrug. A second major advantage as
demonstrated here is the ability to induce antitumor immune responses after Toca 511+5-FC
mediated tumor ablation. Importantly, prodrug conversion is intracellular and metabolic
inactivation of 5-FU is rapid, so that cytotoxicity is confined locally to the tumor.
Adverse systemic effects characteristic of conventional chemotherapy, such as
myelosuppression, are avoided and the immune system remains intact. Antitumor immunity can
be further enabled by local generation of 5-FU leading to ablation of myeloid-derived
suppressor cells selectively within the tumor[26] (Mitchell et al, accompanying manuscript).As noted, Toca 511+Toca FC is now being evaluated in phase II/III trials for recurrent
high-grade glioma, and we are investigating whether anticancer immunity is similarly induced
and contributes to clinical activity. Given recent interest in cancer immunotherapy and
immune checkpoint blockade, the pro-immunogenic effects of RRV-mediated prodrug conversion
for tumor cell killing and tumor antigen release and for bystander killing of
immunosuppressive tumor stromal cells may prove widely useful.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary material is available at Neuro-Oncology online.
Funding
This work was supported in part by U01NS059821 from the National Institute of Neurological
Diseases and Stroke (to N.K.). ABC2 Foundation, the National Brain Tumor Society, the
American Brain Tumor Association, the Musella Foundation, and Voices Against Brain Cancer
provided financial support to Tocagen.Conflict of interest statement. T.T.H., L.A.M., D.O., J.M.R., H.E.G. and D.J.J.
are employees and/or shareholders of Tocagen Inc.; N.K. owns stock and receives consulting
fees from Tocagen Inc.Companion Paper. Please note that this manuscript is one of a pair, with its
companion paper: Mitchell et al, “Toca 511 gene transfer and treatment with the prodrug,
5-fluorocytosine, promotes durable antitumor immunity in a mouse glioma model.”Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Susan Johnson; Michael Eller; Jeffrey E Teigler; Sebastien M Maloveste; Bruce T Schultz; Damien Z Soghoian; Richard Lu; Alexander F Oster; Agnès-Laurence Chenine; Galit Alter; Ulf Dittmer; Mary Marovich; Merlin L Robb; Nelson L Michael; Diane Bolton; Hendrik Streeck Journal: J Virol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Omar D Perez; Christopher R Logg; Kei Hiraoka; Oscar Diago; Ryan Burnett; Akihito Inagaki; Dawn Jolson; Karin Amundson; Taylor Buckley; Dan Lohse; Amy Lin; Cindy Burrascano; Carlos Ibanez; Noriyuki Kasahara; Harry E Gruber; Douglas J Jolly Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Ainhoa Perez-Diez; Nathalie T Joncker; Kyungho Choi; William F N Chan; Colin C Anderson; Olivier Lantz; Polly Matzinger Journal: Blood Date: 2007-02-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: T T Huang; J Hlavaty; D Ostertag; F L Espinoza; B Martin; H Petznek; M Rodriguez-Aguirre; C E Ibañez; N Kasahara; W Gunzburg; H E Gruber; D Pertschuk; D J Jolly; J M Robbins Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 5.987
Authors: Timothy F Cloughesy; Joseph Landolfi; Daniel J Hogan; Stephen Bloomfield; Bob Carter; Clark C Chen; J Bradley Elder; Steven N Kalkanis; Santosh Kesari; Albert Lai; Ian Y Lee; Linda M Liau; Tom Mikkelsen; Phioanh Leia Nghiemphu; David Piccioni; Tobias Walbert; Alice Chu; Asha Das; Oscar R Diago; Dawn Gammon; Harry E Gruber; Michelle Hanna; Douglas J Jolly; Noriyuki Kasahara; David McCarthy; Leah Mitchell; Derek Ostertag; Joan M Robbins; Maria Rodriguez-Aguirre; Michael A Vogelbaum Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Kei Hiraoka; Takahiro Kimura; Christopher R Logg; Chien-Kuo Tai; Kazunori Haga; Gregory W Lawson; Noriyuki Kasahara Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ole Audun Werner Haabeth; Anders Aune Tveita; Marte Fauskanger; Fredrik Schjesvold; Kristina Berg Lorvik; Peter O Hofgaard; Hilde Omholt; Ludvig A Munthe; Zlatko Dembic; Alexandre Corthay; Bjarne Bogen Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Andrew Hofacre; Kader Yagiz; Daniel Mendoza; Fernando Lopez Espinoza; Anthony W Munday; Cynthia Burrascano; Oded Singer; Harry E Gruber; Douglas J Jolly; Amy H Lin Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Alexander F Haddad; Jacob S Young; Nikhil V Mummaneni; Noriyuki Kasahara; Manish K Aghi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Timothy F Cloughesy; Joseph Landolfi; Michael A Vogelbaum; Derek Ostertag; James B Elder; Stephen Bloomfield; Bob Carter; Clark C Chen; Steven N Kalkanis; Santosh Kesari; Albert Lai; Ian Y Lee; Linda M Liau; Tom Mikkelsen; Phioanh Nghiemphu; David Piccioni; William Accomando; Oscar R Diago; Daniel J Hogan; Dawn Gammon; Noriyuki Kasahara; Thian Kheoh; Douglas J Jolly; Harry E Gruber; Asha Das; Tobias Walbert Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 12.300