| Literature DB >> 28387709 |
Jingjie Wang1, Nan Yu2, Guangmao Mu3, Kamran I Shinwari4, Zhenguo Shen5, Luqing Zheng6.
Abstract
With the rapid progress of industrialization, the effects of environmental contamination on plant toxicity, and subsequently on human health, is a growing concern. For example, the heavy metal pollution of soil such as that caused by cadmium (Cd) is a serious threat. Therefore, screening for pollution-safe edible plants is an essential approach for growing plants under heavy metal-contaminated soils. In the current study, 35 Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis L.) cultivars were selected with the aim of screening for Cd-safe cultivars (CSCs), analyzing their safety, and exploring the mechanism of Cd accumulation. Our field-culture experiments revealed that the Cd content in the edible parts of the cultivars were varied and were determined to possibly be CSCs. Hydroponics experiments were used to simulate six different degrees of soil contamination (high and low Cd concentrations) on possible CSCs. The results indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) in Cd concentration in the cultivars, and verified the safety of these possible CSCs. The analyses of the transport coefficient and expression levels showed that the differences in Cd accumulation among the Chinese cabbage cultivars were related to the expression of genes involved in absorption and transport rather than a root-to-shoot translocation limitation.Entities:
Keywords: Cd; Chinese cabbage; cultivars screening; gene expression; low-accumulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28387709 PMCID: PMC5409596 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14040395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Chinese cabbage cultivars used in the experiments.
| NO. | Name | NO. | Name | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wuxibai | (WXB) | 19 | Heidatou | (HDT) |
| 2 | Nanjinghuoxing | (NJHX) | 20 | Ribenhuawang | (RBHW) |
| 3 | Shanghaiaikangqing | (SHAKQ) | 21 | Jingguan | (JG) |
| 4 | Xiaomei | (XM) | 22 | Jinguan | (JG1) |
| 5 | Xiawang | (XW) | 23 | Siyuebai | (SYB) |
| 6 | Liuyueman | (LYM) | 24 | Dongfang2hao | (DF2H) |
| 7 | Hualvqingxiu | (HLQX) | 25 | Xiaqiang | (XQ) |
| 8 | Aijaohuang | (AJH) | 26 | Canbai | (CB) |
| 9 | Lvyouxing | (LYX) | 27 | Huangguan | (HG) |
| 10 | Qibaoqing | (QBQ) | 28 | Sijiqing | (SJQ) |
| 11 | Erzhuangbai | (EZB) | 29 | Sijiquanneng | (SJQN) |
| 12 | Changgengbai | (CGB) | 30 | Lvqingyihao | (LQYH) |
| 13 | Jimaocai | (JMC) | 31 | Siyueman | (SYM) |
| 14 | Kangre 605 | (KR 605) | 32 | Sijixiaobaicai | (SJXBC) |
| 15 | Shanghaiqing | (SHQ) | 33 | Zhongqibai | (ZQB) |
| 16 | Xiaoairen | (XAR) | 34 | Gaoganbai | (GGB) |
| 17 | Wuyueman | (WYM) | 35 | Aijiaoqing | (AJQ) |
| 18 | Suzhouqing | (SZQ) | |||
Physical-chemical properties of tested topsoil.
| Soil Property | Field-Culture Soil |
|---|---|
| pH | 6.13 |
| Total Cd (mg/kg DW) | 2.42 |
| Total Pb (mg/kg DW) | 449.19 |
| Available Cd (mg/kg DW) | 1.73 ± 0.12 |
| Available Pb (mg/kg DW) | 70.39 ± 11.96 |
| Organic matter (mg/kg DW) | 5.12 |
| Ammonium (mg/kg DW) | 25.67 |
| Available P (mg/kg DW) | 37.54 |
| Available K (mg/kg DW) | 49.89 |
Figure 1Cd content in the shoots of 35 varieties of non-heading Chinese cabbage.
Figure 2Cd content in the (A) roots and (B) shoots of non-heading Chinese cabbage grown hydroponically under control (0 μM) and high Cd treatments T1 and T2 (10 and 20 μM respectively). Bars show mean values ± SD (n = 3). Different letters ‘’a’’ and ‘’b’’ represent statistical significant differences among different varieties under the same treatment according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Cd content in the (A) roots and (B) shoots of non-heading Chinese cabbage grown hydroponically under control (0 μM) and low Cd treatments T3, T4 and T5 (0.02, 0.2 and 2 μM respectively). Bars show mean values ± SD (n = 3). Different letters ‘’a’’, ‘’b’’ and ‘’c’’ represent statistical significant differences among different varieties under the same treatment according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Translocation factors (TFs) of different concentrations of Cd in different cultivars of non-heading Chinese cabbage.
| TFs | Cultivars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CB | HLQX | DF2H | ||
| Low-Cd treatments | 0.02 μM | 1.103 | 0.075 | 0.049 |
| 0.2 μM | 0.191 | 0.28 | 0.291 | |
| 2 μM | 0.035 | 0.038 | 0.071 | |
| High-Cd treatments | 10 μM | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| 20 μM | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.12 | |
Figure 4Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of (A) NRT1.8 and (B) Nramp3 transporter genes expression in roots of low (HLQX and CB) and high (DF2H) Cd accumulation cultivars of Chinese cabbage under control (Cd, 0 μM) conditions. The y-axis shows the relative expression level normalized to Actin (as an internal control). Bars show mean values ± SD (n = 3). Different letters ‘’a’’ and ‘’b’’ represent statistical significant differences among different varieties according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).