OBJECTIVE: Aging is often associated with declines in episodic memory. Reliable tracking of memory requires assessment instruments that are stable over time to better understand changes potentially attributable to neurodegenerative disease. While prior studies support the test-retest reliability of memory instruments over brief intervals, follow-up testing in clinical settings typically occurs at least one-year later. The present study evaluated the long-term test-retest reliability of the California Verbal Learning Test - second edition (CVLT-2), a widely used measure of episodic learning and memory. METHOD: One hundred and fifty seven healthy older adults (mean age = 68.47 years; education = 17.28 years) underwent repeat assessment at an average of 1.30 years apart. Participants underwent repeat assessment using either parallel or alternate forms at follow-up. We utilized a standardized regression-based (SRB) approach to determine statistically significant changes in test scores over time. RESULTS: This study revealed modest 1-year test-retest correlation coefficients for the primary CVLT-2 measures (range = .57-.69) Results of SRB formulae are provided to assist clinicians with defining clinically relevant cognitive change on the CVLT-2 while controlling for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study support repeat test administration of the CVLT-2 over longer periods, and may enhance its applicability in determining longitudinal change in memory performance.
OBJECTIVE: Aging is often associated with declines in episodic memory. Reliable tracking of memory requires assessment instruments that are stable over time to better understand changes potentially attributable to neurodegenerative disease. While prior studies support the test-retest reliability of memory instruments over brief intervals, follow-up testing in clinical settings typically occurs at least one-year later. The present study evaluated the long-term test-retest reliability of the California Verbal Learning Test - second edition (CVLT-2), a widely used measure of episodic learning and memory. METHOD: One hundred and fifty seven healthy older adults (mean age = 68.47 years; education = 17.28 years) underwent repeat assessment at an average of 1.30 years apart. Participants underwent repeat assessment using either parallel or alternate forms at follow-up. We utilized a standardized regression-based (SRB) approach to determine statistically significant changes in test scores over time. RESULTS: This study revealed modest 1-year test-retest correlation coefficients for the primary CVLT-2 measures (range = .57-.69) Results of SRB formulae are provided to assist clinicians with defining clinically relevant cognitive change on the CVLT-2 while controlling for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study support repeat test administration of the CVLT-2 over longer periods, and may enhance its applicability in determining longitudinal change in memory performance.
Authors: Robert L Heilbronner; Jerry J Sweet; Deborah K Attix; Kevin R Krull; George K Henry; Robert P Hart Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Deborah K Attix; Tyler J Story; Gordon J Chelune; J D Ball; Michael L Stutts; Robert P Hart; Jeffrey T Barth Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Alan D Dangour; Elizabeth Allen; Diana Elbourne; Nicky Fasey; Astrid E Fletcher; Pollyanna Hardy; Graham E Holder; Rosemary Knight; Louise Letley; Marcus Richards; Ricardo Uauy Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Irina Rannikko; Marianne Haapea; Jouko Miettunen; Juha Veijola; Graham K Murray; Jennifer H Barnett; Anja P Husa; Peter B Jones; Matti Isohanni; Erika Jääskeläinen Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Adam M Staffaroni; Duygu Tosun; Jue Lin; Fanny M Elahi; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Matthew J Wynn; Nihar Patel; John Neuhaus; Samantha M Walters; Elissa S Epel; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Joel H Kramer Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Amanpreet K Cheema; Laura E Wiener; Rebecca B McNeil; Maria M Abreu; Travis Craddock; Mary A Fletcher; Drew A Helmer; J Wesson Ashford; Kimberly Sullivan; Nancy G Klimas Journal: Life Sci Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 6.780