Duckhee Chae1, Kyeong-Hwa Kang2, Ramona Benkert3, Ardith Z Doorenbos4. 1. College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea. 2. Department of Nursing, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea. 3. College of Nursing, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 4. Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
AIM: The 25 item Cultural Competence Assessment assesses the cultural competence of multiple types of healthcare providers. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the questionnaire (KCCA) and to determine the need for changes to improve its validity and reliability. METHODS: Data from 161 hospital nurses were used for the item analysis and to assess the reliability and construct validity of the KCCA before and after the deletion of nine items. RESULTS: The KCCA did not demonstrate acceptable construct validity and subscale internal reliability. Nine items with high interitem correlations, high modification indices, and relatively lower factor loadings were deleted. The 16 item Modified KCCA showed improved construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability. CONCLUSION: While further psychometric evaluation of the Modified KCCA should be undertaken with larger samples and diverse professionals, the study's data provide evidence that the Modified KCCA might be a more suitable measure for use among Korean healthcare providers.
AIM: The 25 item Cultural Competence Assessment assesses the cultural competence of multiple types of healthcare providers. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the questionnaire (KCCA) and to determine the need for changes to improve its validity and reliability. METHODS: Data from 161 hospital nurses were used for the item analysis and to assess the reliability and construct validity of the KCCA before and after the deletion of nine items. RESULTS: The KCCA did not demonstrate acceptable construct validity and subscale internal reliability. Nine items with high interitem correlations, high modification indices, and relatively lower factor loadings were deleted. The 16 item Modified KCCA showed improved construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability. CONCLUSION: While further psychometric evaluation of the Modified KCCA should be undertaken with larger samples and diverse professionals, the study's data provide evidence that the Modified KCCA might be a more suitable measure for use among Korean healthcare providers.
Authors: Ramona Benkert; Thomas Templin; Stephanie Myers Schim; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Sue Ellen Bell Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 2.228