Jochen René Thyrian1. 1. Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Standort Rostock/Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Deutschland. rene.thyrian@dzne.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 110 years after the first description of Alzheimer's disease (AD) healthcare systems worldwide face the challenge of increasing numbers of people affected by dementia. There is a need to develop (national) dementia plans on a societal level to implement strategies to combat these challenges. These plans, among other topics, explicitly aim at scientific and research strategies as well as support and healthcare structures. OBJECTIVE: This article describes a selection of current healthcare research studies and projects in Germany. Selected studies are presented which deliver concepts and approaches to answer the most pressing issues in dementia healthcare research in primary care and the scientific evidence is summarized. Future needs in dementia research and healthcare research are presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The projects under examination are (a) the Leipzig longitudinal study of the aged (LEILA75+), (b) the German study on aging, cognition and dementia (AgeCoDe), (c) the dementia care initiative in primary practice (IDA), (d) the Dementia: life- and person-centered help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (DelpHi) trial, (e) studies analyzing dementia care networks (IDEMUCK and DemNet-D) and (f) the general hospital study (GHoSt). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Prevalence and incidence studies have shown how high the impact of AD is on the current healthcare systems and how it is expected to be in the future. Other studies have identified risk factors as well as protective factors that can serve as target points for the development of effective interventions. They also give hints on where the healthcare system might benefit from changes. Healthcare research has identified scientific methods helpful in providing sound evidence for decision makers in health policy. These have been applied in healthcare research close to routine care and have shown their impact on routine care; however, there are healthcare-specific challenges when applying scientific methods in routine care, which are briefly described.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 110 years after the first description of Alzheimer's disease (AD) healthcare systems worldwide face the challenge of increasing numbers of people affected by dementia. There is a need to develop (national) dementia plans on a societal level to implement strategies to combat these challenges. These plans, among other topics, explicitly aim at scientific and research strategies as well as support and healthcare structures. OBJECTIVE: This article describes a selection of current healthcare research studies and projects in Germany. Selected studies are presented which deliver concepts and approaches to answer the most pressing issues in dementia healthcare research in primary care and the scientific evidence is summarized. Future needs in dementia research and healthcare research are presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The projects under examination are (a) the Leipzig longitudinal study of the aged (LEILA75+), (b) the German study on aging, cognition and dementia (AgeCoDe), (c) the dementia care initiative in primary practice (IDA), (d) the Dementia: life- and person-centered help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (DelpHi) trial, (e) studies analyzing dementia care networks (IDEMUCK and DemNet-D) and (f) the general hospital study (GHoSt). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Prevalence and incidence studies have shown how high the impact of AD is on the current healthcare systems and how it is expected to be in the future. Other studies have identified risk factors as well as protective factors that can serve as target points for the development of effective interventions. They also give hints on where the healthcare system might benefit from changes. Healthcare research has identified scientific methods helpful in providing sound evidence for decision makers in health policy. These have been applied in healthcare research close to routine care and have shown their impact on routine care; however, there are healthcare-specific challenges when applying scientific methods in routine care, which are briefly described.
Authors: Horst Christian Vollmar; Elmar Grässel; Jörg Lauterberg; Simone Neubauer; Maria Grossfeld-Schmitz; Nik Koneczny; Cornelia-Christine Schürer-Maly; Mitra Koch; Norman Ehlert; Rolf Holle; Monika A Rieger; Martin Butzlaff Journal: Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich Date: 2007
Authors: Frank Jessen; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Birgitt Wiese; Horst Bickel; Edelgard Mösch; Hanna Kaduszkiewicz; Michael Pentzek; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Tobias Luck; Angela Fuchs; Siegfried Weyerer; Jochen Werle; Hendrik van den Bussche; Martin Scherer; Wolfgang Maier; Michael Wagner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael Pentzek; Anja Wollny; Birgitt Wiese; Frank Jessen; Franziska Haller; Wolfgang Maier; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Matthias C Angermeyer; Horst Bickel; Edelgard Mösch; Siegfried Weyerer; Jochen Werle; Cadja Bachmann; Thomas Zimmermann; Hendrik van den Bussche; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Angela Fuchs Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Markus Wübbeler; Diana Wucherer; Johannes Hertel; Bernhard Michalowsky; Steffen Heinrich; Saskia Meyer; Susanne Schaefer-Walkmann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Jochen René Thyrian Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Markus Wübbeler; Jochen René Thyrian; Bernhard Michalowsky; Johannes Hertel; Franziska Laporte Uribe; Karin Wolf-Ostermann; Susanne Schäfer-Walkmann; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2015-05-21
Authors: Johannes Gräske; Annika Schmidt; Sylvia Schmidt; Franziska Laporte Uribe; Jochen René Thyrian; Bernhard Michalowsky; Susanne Schäfer-Walkmann; Karin Wolf-Ostermann Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Sonia Lech; Julie L O'Sullivan; Leonard Wellmann; Juliana Supplieth; Susanne Döpfmer; Paul Gellert; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Johanna Nordheim Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: F Kracht; M Boekholt; F Schumacher-Schönert; A Nikelski; N Chikhradze; P Lücker; H C Vollmar; W Hoffmann; S H Kreisel; J R Thyrian Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 3.921