Literature DB >> 28386713

The effect of age on the homotopic motor cortical long-term potentiation-like effect induced by quadripulse stimulation.

Ritsuko Hanajima1,2,3, Nobuyuki Tanaka4, Ryosuke Tsutsumi5,4, Hiroyuki Enomoto6, Mitsunari Abe6, Koichiro Nakamura6, Shunsuke Kobayashi6, Masashi Hamada4, Takahiro Shimizu5,4, Yasuo Terao4, Yoshikazu Ugawa6,7.   

Abstract

The reduction of plasticity with age has been shown by many previous papers in animal experiments. This issue can be studied in humans because several non-invasive brain stimulation techniques induce synaptic plasticity in the human brain. We investigated the influence of individuals' age on the responder rate of the long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effect induced by quadripulse magnetic stimulation (QPS). The participants were 107 healthy volunteers: 53 older participants (Mean ± SD 65.0 ± 1.5 years) and 54 younger participants (37.2 ± 8.7). The quadripulse stimulation with 5-ms inter-pulse interval (QPS5) was applied over the primary motor cortex (M1). We measured motor evoked potentials (MEPs) before QPS, and at five time points after QPS for up to 25 min. In each participant, average MEP amplitude (size) ratios were quantified. We first classified participants as responders and non-responders simply by comparing the size ratio with 1.0 for consistency with previous studies, then as "significant responders", "non-responders", and "opposite responders" for more detailed analysis by comparing the size ratio with the mean and standard deviation of the MEP size ratios of the sham condition. The degree of LTP-like effects induced by QPS5 was significantly smaller in the older group compared to the younger group. Also, the rates of responders and significant responders were lower in the older group (58 and 47%, respectively) compared to the younger group (80 and 76%, respectively). The age of the participants significantly affected the LTP-like effect induced by QPS5, which suggests that brain plasticity decreases with age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age dependence; Cortical plasticity; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28386713     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4953-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Erwin Kunesch; Reiner Benecke; Leonardo G Cohen; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Effects of Quadripulse Stimulation on Human Motor Cortex Excitability: A Replication Study.

Authors:  Sara Simeoni; Ricci Hannah; Daisuke Sato; Michiyuki Kawakami; John Rothwell; Sara Simeoni; Gian Luigi Gigli; Daisuke Sato; Michiyuki Kawakami
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Effects of aging on the human motor cortical plasticity studied by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Dina Fathi; Yoshino Ueki; Tatsuya Mima; Satoko Koganemaru; Takashi Nagamine; Amal Tawfik; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Inter- and intra-subject variability of motor cortex plasticity following continuous theta-burst stimulation.

Authors:  A-M Vallence; M R Goldsworthy; N A Hodyl; J G Semmler; J B Pitcher; M C Ridding
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms.

Authors:  Virginia López-Alonso; Binith Cheeran; Dan Río-Rodríguez; Miguel Fernández-Del-Olmo
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Mark J Edwards; Elisabeth Rounis; Kailash P Bhatia; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Selective changes in thin spine density and morphology in monkey prefrontal cortex correlate with aging-related cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Dani Dumitriu; Jiandong Hao; Yuko Hara; Jeffrey Kaufmann; William G M Janssen; Wendy Lou; Peter R Rapp; John H Morrison
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Plasticity Induced by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Bilateral Motor Cortices Is Not Altered in Older Adults.

Authors:  Daina S E Dickins; Martin V Sale; Marc R Kamke
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Short-latency afferent inhibition is a poor predictor of individual susceptibility to rTMS-induced plasticity in the motor cortex of young and older adults.

Authors:  Marielle Young-Bernier; Annick N Tanguay; Patrick S R Davidson; François Tremblay
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.750

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Age-related changes in motor cortex plasticity assessed with non-invasive brain stimulation: an update and new perspectives.

Authors:  John G Semmler; Brodie J Hand; Ryoki Sasaki; Ashley Merkin; George M Opie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Quadripulse stimulation (QPS).

Authors:  Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation Influences Response Inhibition: Cortico-cortical and Cortico-subcortical Networks.

Authors:  Sina Kohl; Ricci Hannah; Lorenzo Rocchi; Camilla L Nord; John Rothwell; Valerie Voon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A focus on network mechanisms and state dependence.

Authors:  Luca Cocchi; Andrew Zalesky; Zoie Nott; Geneviève Whybird; Paul B Fitzgerald; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 5.  Is There a Future for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool?

Authors:  Carmen Terranova; Vincenzo Rizzo; Alberto Cacciola; Gaetana Chillemi; Alessandro Calamuneri; Demetrio Milardi; Angelo Quartarone
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.