Literature DB >> 28386697

Postoperative changes after surgical mesh hernia repair: a pitfall in interpretation of 18F-FDG PET-CT.

T Davidson1,2, E Klang3, E Goshen4,5, J Goldstein6, M Khaikin7,5, B Chikman8, S Ben-Haim4,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A number of case reports have demonstrated FDG uptake around mesh prostheses after hernia repair surgery. This study characterizes FDG PET-CT findings after hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a series of cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: FDG PET-CT studies were reviewed for increased FDG uptake consistent with CT appearances of post-surgical hernia repair in cancer patients. The findings were correlated with clinical data and follow-up studies.
RESULTS: 53 PET-CT studies in 22 patients (18 males, 31-79 years) were identified. Surgery for repair of inguinal (n = 14), ventral (n = 5) or umbilical (n = 3) hernia was performed, 4-204 months prior to PET-CT. FDG avidity was focal or linear in the region of the anterior abdominal or pelvic wall (mean SUV max 4.0 ± 2.3). Corresponding nonspecific CT findings included soft tissue thickening (n = 18), fat infiltration (n = 20) and fluid collection (n = 19) in the region of the omentum, adjacent to or in the inner abdominal or pelvic wall at the surgical site. Linear hyper-dense structures (n = 9) or metallic clips (n = 8) seen on CT suggested benign postoperative changes. In 10/12 (83.3%) patients with repeat PET-CT, FDG uptake remained unchanged, one showed more diffuse uptake and another showed reduced uptake on follow-up. There was neither significant change in CT appearance at the surgical site in these 12 patients, nor in 3 additional patients with only CT follow-up. Another 3 patients had previous CT demonstrating hernia at the same location.
CONCLUSION: With increasing use of synthetic mesh, awareness of variations in FDG PET-CT appearance is important to avoid false interpretation in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG PET CT; Foreign body reaction; Hernia; Mesh

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28386697     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1596-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  32 in total

1.  Asymptomatic port-site metastasis following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery detected by FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Guang-Uei Hung; Hon-Ki Hsu; Chia-Hung Kao; Kuang-Yun Chen; Jainn-Shiun Chiu
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  Persistent foreign body reaction around inguinal mesh prostheses: a potential pitfall of FDG PET.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Jean-François Deux; Iliana Peretti; Laurence Mabille; Jacques Mandet; Patrice Callard; Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  PET/CT detects abdominal wall and port site metastases of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  E Goshen; T Davidson; D Aderka; S T Zwas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; J Conze; W Limberg; B Obolenski; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

5.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in inflammation of unknown origin: a cost-effectiveness pilot-study.

Authors:  H Balink; S S Tan; N J G M Veeger; F Holleman; B L F van Eck-Smit; R J Bennink; H J Verberne
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Mesh implants in hernia repair. Inflammatory cell response in a rat model.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; A Schachtrupp; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.745

7.  Abdominal Mesh Implant Showing FDG Uptake on PET/CT.

Authors:  Sang-Ah Jung; Dae-Weung Kim; Soon-Ah Park; Chang Guhn Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-07-01

8.  PET/US fusion as a problem-solving tool in oncology imaging: differentiation of hernia repair mesh plugs from malignancy suspected on PET/CT.

Authors:  Robert Drescher; Martin Freesmeyer
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.794

9.  Early and late postoperative inflammatory and collagen deposition responses in three different meshes: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  C G Pereira-lucena; R Artigiani Neto; D T de Rezende; G de J Lopes-Filho; D Matos; M M Linhares
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Intense FDG Uptake around the Inguinal Surgical Mesh 5 Years after Operation: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Tatiana Bahçeci; Gül Nihal Nursal; Mehmet Aydın
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2012-04-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Fat necrosis after abdominal surgery: A pitfall in interpretation of FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Tima Davidson; Eyal Lotan; Eyal Klang; Johnatan Nissan; Jeffrey Goldstein; Elinor Goshen; Simona Ben-Haim; Sara Apter; Bar Chikman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  18F-FDG PET-CT postoperative changes after maxillectomy: Findings and pitfalls in interpretation.

Authors:  Tima Davidson; Johnatan Nissan; Maria Krichmar; Eyal Lotan; Shai Shrot; Iris Gluck; Paul Lawson; Ran Yahalom; Shay Duvdevani
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam; Viktoriya Paroder; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.802

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.