Literature DB >> 28386683

[Quality indicators for rescue operations in terrorist attacks or other threats : A pilot study after the Würzburg terrorist attack of July 2016].

T Wurmb1, P Justice2, S Dietz3, R Schua4, T Jarausch5, U Kinstle6, J Greiner7, G Möldner8, J Müller9, M Kraus10, S Simon11, U Wagenhäuser12, N Roewer13, M Helm14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Terrorist attacks have become reality in Germany. The aim of this work was, after the Würzburg terrorist attack, to define quality indicators and application characteristics for rescue missions in life-threatening situations. The results can be used to record data from future missions using this template in order to make them comparable with each other.
METHODS: After approval of the local ethic committee, the first step was to designate a group of experts in order to define the template in a consensus process. The next step was to perform the consensus process by defining the template. An independent expert for emergency medicine and disaster management reviewed and approved the results afterwards.
RESULTS: The expert group defined 13 categories and 158 parameters that will further serve the systematic evaluation of the rescue mission of the Würzburg terror attack. Preliminary results of this evaluation process are given in this paper; the full evaluation has not yet been completed. DISCUSSION: In this study we first describe quality indicators and parameters suitable for the German rescue system in order to evaluate rescue operations for violence caused mass casualties. There is similar international documentation, but it does not specifically focus on life-threatening operations and are not adapted to the German context.
CONCLUSION: There is an important need to systematically evaluate rescue missions after mass killing incidents. In this study we report a template of parameters and quality indicators in order to systematically evaluate mass violence events. The presented template is the result of an expert consensus process and may serve as a basis for further development and research.

Keywords:  Evaluation; Mass casualties; Quality indicators; Rescue mission; Terror attack

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28386683     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-017-0298-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  9 in total

1.  The medical response to multisite terrorist attacks in Paris.

Authors:  Martin Hirsch; Pierre Carli; Rémy Nizard; Bruno Riou; Barouyr Baroudjian; Thierry Baubet; Vibol Chhor; Charlotte Chollet-Xemard; Nicolas Dantchev; Nadia Fleury; Jean-Paul Fontaine; Youri Yordanov; Maurice Raphael; Catherine Paugam Burtz; Antoine Lafont
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Report from Paris.

Authors:  Charlotte J Haug
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The Hartford Consensus: THREAT, a medical disaster preparedness concept.

Authors:  Lenworth M Jacobs; David S Wade; Norman E McSwain; Frank K Butler; William P Fabbri; Alexander L Eastman; Michael Rotondo; John Sinclair; Karyl J Burns
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Experience With a Novel, Global, Open-Access Template for Major Incidents: Qualitative Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Sabina Fattah; Kari Milch Agledahl; Marius Rehn; Torben Wisborg
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 1.385

5.  The Hartford Consensus on Active Shooters: Implementing the Continuum of Prehospital Trauma Response.

Authors:  Peter T Pons; Jesse Jerome; Jeffrey McMullen; James Manson; James Robinson; Will Chapleau
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  3 Echo: concept of operations for early care and evacuation of victims of mass violence.

Authors:  Allen W Autrey; John L Hick; Kurtis Bramer; Jeremy Berndt; Jonathan Bundt
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.040

7.  Terrorist attacks in Paris: Surgical trauma experience in a referral center.

Authors:  Thomas M Gregory; Thomas Bihel; Pierre Guigui; Jérôme Pierrart; Benjamin Bouyer; Baptiste Magrino; Damien Delgrande; Thibault Lafosse; Jaber Al Khaili; Antoine Baldacci; Guillaume Lonjon; Sébastien Moreau; Laurent Lantieri; Jean-Marc Alsac; Jean-Baptiste Dufourcq; Jean Mantz; Philippe Juvin; Philippe Halimi; Richard Douard; Olivier Mir; Emmanuel Masmejean
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  A consensus based template for reporting of pre-hospital major incident medical management.

Authors:  Sabina Fattah; Marius Rehn; David Lockey; Julian Thompson; Hans Morten Lossius; Torben Wisborg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  French Ministry of Health's response to Paris attacks of 13 November 2015.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Philippe; Olivier Brahic; Pierre Carli; Jean-Pierre Tourtier; Bruno Riou; Benoit Vallet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Comparison of two models of a treatment area with respect to treatment times in critically ill patients : A pilot study].

Authors:  M Kippnich; F Wallström; M Kolbe; H Erhard; U Kippnich; T Wurmb
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Structured analysis, evaluation and report of the emergency response to a terrorist attack in Wuerzburg, Germany using a new template of standardised quality indicators.

Authors:  T Wurmb; N Schorscher; P Justice; S Dietz; R Schua; T Jarausch; U Kinstle; J Greiner; G Möldner; J Müller; M Kraus; S Simon; U Wagenhäuser; J Hemm; N Roewer; M Helm
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.