| Literature DB >> 28386180 |
Li Wang1, Xiaoyi Wang1, Xuebo Jin1, Jiping Xu1, Huiyan Zhang1, Jiabin Yu1, Qian Sun1, Chong Gao1, Lingbin Wang1.
Abstract
The formation process of algae is described inaccurately and water blooms are predicted with a low precision by current methods. In this paper, chemical mechanism of algae growth is analyzed, and a correlation analysis of chlorophyll-a and algal density is conducted by chemical measurement. Taking into account the influence of multi-factors on algae growth and water blooms, the comprehensive prediction method combined with multivariate time series and intelligent model is put forward in this paper. Firstly, through the process of photosynthesis, the main factors that affect the reproduction of the algae are analyzed. A compensation prediction method of multivariate time series analysis based on neural network and Support Vector Machine has been put forward which is combined with Kernel Principal Component Analysis to deal with dimension reduction of the influence factors of blooms. Then, Genetic Algorithm is applied to improve the generalization ability of the BP network and Least Squares Support Vector Machine. Experimental results show that this method could better compensate the prediction model of multivariate time series analysis which is an effective way to improve the description accuracy of algae growth and prediction precision of water blooms.Entities:
Keywords: Algae growth; Chemical mechanism; Multi-factor; Prediction; Water blooms
Year: 2017 PMID: 28386180 PMCID: PMC5372426 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1Molecular structure of chlorophyll-a.
Figure 2Microscopy and experimental incubator.
Figure 3Algae growth curve.
Figure 4Correlation analysis of algae density and chlorophyll-a.
Figure 5Algae cell.
Figure 6Error compensation schematic diagram.
Figure 7Flow chart of forecasting method of blooms in lakes based on error compensation.
The monitoring list of bloom characteristic factors.
| Name | PH | OC | T | Turbidity | TN | TP | DO | Chl-a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | Null | mg/L | °C | NTU | mg/L | mg/L | mg/L | mg/L |
Figure 8Affecting factors monitoring data.
Figure 9Chlorophyll-a data for error modeling and prediction.
The Kernel Principal Component Analysis feature vector of error influencing factors.
| Principal component | PH | OC | T | Turbidity |
| 1 | −0.143 | −0.157 | 0.062 | −0.108 |
| 2 | 0.276 | 0.069 | 0.245 | −0.238 |
| 3 | −0.147 | 0.226 | 0.364 | −0.052 |
| Principal component | TN | TP | DO | Prediction error |
| 1 | −0.065 | 0.343 | 0.311 | 0.572 |
| 2 | −0.689 | 0.685 | 0.047 | −0.421 |
| 3 | −0.567 | 0.035 | 0.093 | 0.349 |
Figure 10Error prediction.
Figure 11Chlorophyll-a prediction.
The error comparison of final prediction with five methods.
| TS | BP | GA-BP | LSSVM | GA-LSSVM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Err (%) | 116.9 | 64.2 | 40.7 | 43.4 | 35.4 |