| Literature DB >> 28386104 |
Tibor Z Veres1, Tamás Kopcsányi2, Marko Tirri3, Armin Braun4, Masayuki Miyasaka2,5, Ronald N Germain6, Sirpa Jalkanen2, Marko Salmi2,7.
Abstract
The mucosal layer of conducting airways is the primary tissue exposed to inhaled microorganisms, allergens and pollutants. We developed an in vivo two-photon microscopic approach that allows performing dynamic imaging studies in the mouse trachea, which is a commonly used in vivo model of human small-diameter bronchi. By providing stabilized access to the tracheal mucosa without intubation, our setup uniquely allows dynamic in vivo imaging of mucociliary clearance and steady-state immune cell behavior within the complex airway mucosal tissue.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28386104 PMCID: PMC5429620 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00769-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Technical setup of intravital microscopy on the mouse trachea. (a) Trachea of an anesthetized mouse after micro-surgical exposure. Arrows indicate the wire retractor. Asterisk indicates vacuum grease ring. Dashed circle indicates the typical observation area. (b) Imaging setup with a custom-made stage. Arrow indicates the custom-made “tracheal window”. Double arrow indicates the tooth bar (see Supplementary Figure 1 for details). (c) Improved, adjustable “tracheal window” for imaging the intubation-free trachea. Images show the two end-positions (“open” and “closed”) of the adjustable mechanism that allows fine adjustments of the 3D-printed plates (arrows) that provide external, lateral support of the trachea. Inserts in top images show the adjustable supporters at higher magnification. Bar = 5 mm. (d) Schematic diagram (non-proportionate) showing the cross-section of the trachea with the basic principle of accessing it for observation via MP-IVM. Numbers indicate: long working-distance objective lens (1); immersion medium (2); frame of imaging window (3); coverslip (4); vacuum grease (5) for sealing the observation area; lateral support mechanism (6) for the intubation-free setup; peritracheal space filled up with saline (7); tracheal lumen (8); carotid arteries (9). Dashed box indicates the volume typically accessed for imaging. (e) Tracheal preparation ready for imaging experiment (intubated and intubation-free setup). Upper panels show the observation area as seen through the “tracheal window” in top-view (bar = 5 mm); lower panels show in side-view the relation of the intubation cannula (double arrow) and other parts of the stage to the tracheal window (arrows).
Figure 2Comparison between the intubated and intubation-free setup. (a–c) Analysis of vascular leakage by i.v. injected fluorescent dextran, 155 kDa for (a); 2,000 kDa for (b and c). (a) Snapshots from Supplementary Videos 1 and 3 are shown, bar = 100 µm. (b) Changes of MFI in the intravascular vs. extravascular compartment during a 60 min imaging period. Curves are representative of 5 measurements performed with each setup. (c) Analysis of changes in MFI in the extravascular compartment at 10 min or 60 min after dextran injection. MFI of the extravascular space at 1 min was used as a reference (dashed line represents value of 1 = no change; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 as determined using Mann-Whitney test, n = 5 mice). (d–f) Analysis of inflammatory cell recruitment to the interstitial space using ubiquitously fluorescent CAG-ECFP mice. (d) Snapshots from Supplementary Videos 1 and 3, colored lines indicate tracks of motile cells, grid spacing = 20 µm. (e) Number of motile cell tracks within a defined volume of tissue (346 µm × 346 µm × 33 µm), detected during a period of 60 min. Cells with a minimum speed of >2 µm/min were considered as motile (*p < 0.05; as determined using Mann-Whitney test, n = 4–5 mice). (f) Analysis of mean velocities; each dot represents one cell. Data were pooled from the analysis of n = 4–5 mice (****p < 0.0001 as determined using Mann-Whitney test). (g,h) Analysis of IE-DC dynamic probing behavior. (g) Snapshots of individual IE-DCs at the beginning and at the end of a 90 min imaging period (with overlay, see also the corresponding Supplementary Videos 6 and 7), bar = 20 µm. (h) Number of dendritic extensions/IE-DC; each dot represents an IE-DC. The same cell was analyzed at the beginning and at the end of a 90 min imaging period (**p < 0.01 and n.s.: non-significant, as determined using paired t-test).
Figure 3Visualizing IE-DC probing behavior and mucociliary clearance in the steady-state. (a) IE-DCs were visualized in CD11c-EYFP x UBC-TdTomato mice using the intubation-free setup. Snapshots from Supplementary Video 9 are shown as XY and ZY representations, bar = 50 µm. Arrows indicate an IE-DC. (b) Yellow/green fluorescent 0.5 µm polystyrene beads were o.ph. delivered to UBC-TdTomato mice and the tracheal mucosa was visualized using the intubation-free setup. Evans blue was injected i.v. via a tail vein catheter to visualize blood vessels. Snapshots from Supplementary Video 10 are shown as XY and ZY representations, bar = 100 µm. (c) The mean velocities of bead aggregates with an approximate size of 10 µm were determined from single-plane video-rate movies (such as the one shown in Supplementary Video 12). Each dot represents the velocity of a single bead aggregate; horizontal red line indicates mean value. Data were pooled from the analysis of 2 mice.
Comparison of the new, intubation-free setup with the previously used, intubated approach.
| Intubation-free setup | Intubated setup | |
|---|---|---|
| Advantages | • Reduced inflammation | • Better stability |
| • Reduced vascular leakage | ||
| • Preserved DC motility | • Easier access to the trachea | |
| • Intact mucociliary elevator function | • Better signal due to shorter distance from coverslip window | |
| Disadvantages | • Image stability not always optimal | • Pronounced inflammation and vascular leakage |
| • Optical access to the epithelium can be more difficult | • Disturbed DC physiology | |
| • Disrupted mucociliary escalator function |