Literature DB >> 28385912

Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards.

Samuel Pannick1, Stephanie Archer2, Maximillian J Johnston2, Iain Beveridge3, Susannah Jane Long2,4, Thanos Athanasiou5, Nick Sevdalis6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement.
DESIGN: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) involved structured interdisciplinary briefings to capture challenges in care delivery, facilitated organisational escalation of the issues they identified, and feedback. Eighteen months of ethnography and two focus groups were conducted with staff taking part in a trial of PCTS.
RESULTS: PCTS fostered psychological safety-a confidence that the team would not embarrass or punish those who speak up. This was complemented by a hard edge of accountability, whereby team members would regulate their own behaviour in anticipation of future briefings. Frontline concerns were triaged to managers, or resolved autonomously by ward teams, reversing what had been well-established normalisations of deviance. Junior clinicians found a degree of catharsis in airing their concerns, and their teams became more proactive in addressing improvement opportunities. PCTS generated tangible organisational changes, and enabled managers to make a convincing case for investment. However, briefings were constrained by the need to preserve professional credibility, and staff found some comfort in avoiding accountability . At higher organisational levels, frontline concerns were subject to competition with other priorities, and their resolution was limited by the scale of the challenges they described.
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective safety strategies relying on staff-volunteered data produce acceptable, negotiated accounts, subject to the many interdisciplinary tensions that characterise ward work. Nonetheless, these strategies give managers access to the realities of frontline cares, and support frontline staff to make incremental changes in their daily work. These are goals for learning healthcare organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 34806867. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  healthcare quality; interdisciplinary teams; medical ward; patient safety; prospective surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28385912      PMCID: PMC5719651          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  30 in total

1.  Front-line staff perspectives on opportunities for improving the safety and efficiency of hospital work systems.

Authors:  Anita L Tucker; Sara J Singer; Jennifer E Hayes; Alyson Falwell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Huddling for high reliability and situation awareness.

Authors:  Linda M Goldenhar; Patrick W Brady; Kathleen M Sutcliffe; Stephen E Muething
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Walkrounds in practice: corrupting or enhancing a quality improvement intervention? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Graham Martin; Piotr Ozieranski; Janet Willars; Kathryn Charles; Joel Minion; Lorna McKee; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2014-07

4.  Understanding innovators' experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Julie Barnett; Konstantina Vasileiou; Fayika Djemil; Laurence Brooks; Terry Young
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Patient safety incident reporting: a qualitative study of thoughts and perceptions of experts 15 years after 'To Err is Human'.

Authors:  Imogen Mitchell; Anne Schuster; Katherine Smith; Peter Pronovost; Albert Wu
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Patient safety climate in 92 US hospitals: differences by work area and discipline.

Authors:  Sara J Singer; David M Gaba; Alyson Falwell; Shoutzu Lin; Jennifer Hayes; Laurence Baker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Using prospective clinical surveillance to identify adverse events in hospital.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Jim R Worthington; Steven Hawken; Michael Bourke; Fraser Rubens; Kaveh Shojania; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Explaining high and low performers in complex intervention trials: a new model based on diffusion of innovations theory.

Authors:  Heather McMullen; Chris Griffiths; Werner Leber; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review.

Authors:  Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Tom Pape; Martin Utley; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Beyond metrics? Utilizing 'soft intelligence' for healthcare quality and safety.

Authors:  Graham P Martin; Lorna McKee; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: the HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial.

Authors:  Samuel Pannick; Thanos Athanasiou; Susannah J Long; Iain Beveridge; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Camilla B Pimentel; A Lynn Snow; Sarah L Carnes; Nishant R Shah; Julia R Loup; Tatiana M Vallejo-Luces; Caroline Madrigal; Christine W Hartmann
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care.

Authors:  Ayano Ito; Kana Sato; Yoshie Yumoto; Miki Sasaki; Yasuko Ogata
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 4.  The Science of Learning Health Systems: Scoping Review of Empirical Research.

Authors:  Louise A Ellis; Mitchell Sarkies; Kate Churruca; Genevieve Dammery; Isabelle Meulenbroeks; Carolynn L Smith; Chiara Pomare; Zeyad Mahmoud; Yvonne Zurynski; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.