Literature DB >> 28385565

A 10-year profile of enterococcal bloodstream infections at a tertiary-care hospital in Japan.

Hiroyuki Suzuki1, Ryota Hase2, Yoshihito Otsuka3, Naoto Hosokawa4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The first aim of this study is to characterize the epidemiology of enterococcal bloodstream infections (BSIs) at a Japanese tertiary-care hospital. The second aim is to identify predictive factors for 30-day mortality.
METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective observational study. All patients with enterococcal BSI between 2005 and 2014 were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate predictive factors for 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 410 patients with enterococcal BSI were enrolled. Enterococcus faecalis was identified in 200 patients (48.8%) and Enterococcus faecium in 124 patients (30.2%). Isolates were susceptible to ampicillin and vancomycin (67.3% and 97.8%, respectively). Isolates that were not susceptible to vancomycin were either Enterococcus casseliflavus or Enterococcus gallinarum. All strains of E. faecalis and 10.8% of E. faecium strains were susceptible to ampicillin. Thirty-day mortality was 24.8%. Predictive factors for 30-day mortality were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 1-2 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-30.2), CCI 3-4 (adjusted OR 8.79, 95% CI: 1.70-45.4), CCI ≥5 (adjusted OR 17.6, 95% CI: 3.52-88.2), E. faecium bacteremia (adjusted OR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.27-3.76), Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS) ≥5 (adjusted OR 15.1, 95% CI: 6.41-35.6), and source control (adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.72).
CONCLUSION: Vancomycin-resistant strains of E. faecalis and E. faecium were not seen in this cohort. In addition, all strains of E. faecalis and 10.8% of E. faecium strains were susceptible to ampicillin. Predictive factors for 30-day mortality were CCI score, E. faecium bacteremia, PBS score, and source control.
Copyright © 2017 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteremia; Enterococcus faecalis; Enterococcus faecium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28385565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  5 in total

1.  Clinical Characteristics And Risk Factors In Mixed-Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Cheng Zheng; Jiachang Cai; Haizhou Liu; Shufang Zhang; Li Zhong; Nanxia Xuan; Hongwei Zhou; Kai Zhang; Yesong Wang; Xijiang Zhang; Baoping Tian; Zhaocai Zhang; Changming Wang; Wei Cui; Gensheng Zhang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Risk Factors for the Acquisition of Enterococcus faecium Infection and Mortality in Patients with Enterococcal Bacteremia: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis in a Tertiary Care University Hospital.

Authors:  Atsushi Uda; Katsumi Shigemura; Koichi Kitagawa; Kayo Osawa; Kenichiro Onuma; Yonmin Yan; Tatsuya Nishioka; Masato Fujisawa; Ikuko Yano; Takayuki Miyara
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-11

3.  Clinical and microbiological characteristics of bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus spp. within internal medicine wards: a two-year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Tommaso Lupia; Gianmario Roberto; Luca Scaglione; Nour Shbaklo; Ilaria De Benedetto; Silvia Scabini; Simone Mornese Pinna; Antonio Curtoni; Rossana Cavallo; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa; Silvia Corcione
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 5.472

4.  Epidemiology, microbiological and clinical characteristics of Enterococcus species bloodstream infections: A 10-year retrospective cohort study from Qatar.

Authors:  Gawahir A Ali; Wael Goravey; Mostafa Suhail Najim; Khalid M Shunnar; Shahd I Ibrahim; Joanne Daghfal; Emad B Ibrahim; Muna Al Maslamani; Ali S Omrani; Hamad Abdel Hadi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-03

5.  Enterococcal bacteraemia: predictive and prognostic risk factors for ampicillin resistance.

Authors:  T Matsumura; M Nagao; S Nakano; M Yamamoto; Y Matsumura; S Ichiyama
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.434

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.