INTRODUCTION: The non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) was introduced in the North Denmark Region in March 2013. NIPT is offered as an alternative to invasive tests if the combined first trimester risk of trisomy 21 (T21) is ≥ 1:300. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of NIPT implementation among high-risk pregnancies in a region with existing first-trimester combined screening for T21. The primary objective was to examine the effect on the invasive testing rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study including high-risk singleton pregnancies in the North Denmark Region. The women were included in two periods, i.e. before and after the implementation of NIPT, respectively. Group 1 (before NIPT): n = 253 and Group 2 (after NIPT): n = 302. RESULTS: After NIPT implementation, the invasive testing rate fell from 70% to 48% (p < 0.01), and the number of high-risk women refusing further testing dropped from 26% to 3% (p < 0.01). NIPT successfully detected four cases of T21; however, two out of three sex-chromosomal abnormalities were false positives. No false negative NIPT results were revealed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: In the North Denmark Region, the implementation of NIPT in high-risk pregnancies significantly reduced the rate of invasive testing. However, the proportion of high-risk women who opted for prenatal tests increased as the majority of women who previously refused further testing now opted for the NIPT. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (No. 2015-104). Articles published in the Danish Medical Journal are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
INTRODUCTION: The non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) was introduced in the North Denmark Region in March 2013. NIPT is offered as an alternative to invasive tests if the combined first trimester risk of trisomy 21 (T21) is ≥ 1:300. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of NIPT implementation among high-risk pregnancies in a region with existing first-trimester combined screening for T21. The primary objective was to examine the effect on the invasive testing rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study including high-risk singleton pregnancies in the North Denmark Region. The women were included in two periods, i.e. before and after the implementation of NIPT, respectively. Group 1 (before NIPT): n = 253 and Group 2 (after NIPT): n = 302. RESULTS: After NIPT implementation, the invasive testing rate fell from 70% to 48% (p < 0.01), and the number of high-risk women refusing further testing dropped from 26% to 3% (p < 0.01). NIPT successfully detected four cases of T21; however, two out of three sex-chromosomal abnormalities were false positives. No false negative NIPT results were revealed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: In the North Denmark Region, the implementation of NIPT in high-risk pregnancies significantly reduced the rate of invasive testing. However, the proportion of high-risk women who opted for prenatal tests increased as the majority of women who previously refused further testing now opted for the NIPT. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (No. 2015-104). Articles published in the Danish Medical Journal are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Authors: Johanna Mayer; Susanne Brandstetter; Christina Tischer; Birgit Seelbach-Göbel; Sara Fill Malfertheiner; Michael Melter; Michael Kabesch; Christian Apfelbacher Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Bartosz Czuba; Jakub Mlodawski; Anna Kajdy; Dorota Sys; Wojciech Cnota; Marta Mlodawska; Sebastian Kwiatkowski; Pawel Guzik; Miroslaw Wielgos; Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska; Anna Fuchs; Grzegorz Swiercz; Dariusz Borowski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-27 Impact factor: 4.241