| Literature DB >> 28385087 |
Zhengxing Zhang1, Joseph Lau1, Chengcheng Zhang1, Nadine Colpo1, Alessio Nocentini2, Claudiu T Supuran2, François Bénard1,3,4, Kuo-Shyan Lin1,3,4.
Abstract
Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX) is a marker for tumor hypoxia, and its expression is negatively correlated with patient survival. CA-IX represents a potential target for eliminating hypoxic cancers. We synthesized fluorinated cationic sulfonamide inhibitors 1-3 designed to target CA-IX. The binding affinity for CA-IX ranged from 0.22 to 0.96 μM. We evaluated compound 2 as a diagnostic PET imaging agent. Compound 2 was radiolabeled with 18F in 10 ± 4% decay-corrected radiochemical yield with 85.1 ± 70.3 GBq/μmol specific activity and >98% radiochemical purity. 18F-labeled 2 was stable in mouse plasma at 37 °C after 1 h incubation. PET/CT imaging was conducted at 1 h post-injection in a human colorectal cancer xenograft model. 18F-labeled 2 cleared through hepatobiliary and renal pathways. Tumor uptake was approximately 0.41 ± 0.06% ID/g, with a tumor-to-muscle ratio of 1.99 ± 0.25. Subsequently, tumor xenografts were visualized with moderate contrast. This study demonstrates the use of a cationic motif for conferring isoform selectively for CA-IX imaging agents.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonic anhydrase IX; fluorine-18; molecular imaging; positron emission tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28385087 PMCID: PMC6445240 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1308928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.Reported sulfonamide derivatives that are CA-IX selective agents. (A) Trimeric AmBF3-(AEBS)3 and AmBF3-(ABS)3, (B) Ga-DOTA-AEBSA, and (C) cationic sulfonamide derivatives.
Figure 2.Chemical structures of three cationic carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors evaluated in this study.
Scheme 1.Synthesis of cationic carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors 1–3.
Inhibition constants (Ki) of cationic inhibitors 1–3 to carbonic anhydrases I, II, IV, and IX as determined by a stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay. Errors in the range of 5–10% of the reported value from three different assays.
| Inhibition constant ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | CA-I | CA-II | CA-IV | CA-IX |
| 0.89 | 0.72 | >50.0 | 0.44 | |
| 0.52 | 0.07 | 9.54 | 0.22 | |
| 3 | 0.78 | 0.48 | 3.63 | 0.96 |
| 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.03 | |
Scheme 2.(A) Synthesis of the radiolabeling precursor 8. (B) Synthesis of 18F-labeled 2.
Figure 3.HPLC chromatograms of 18F-labeled 2 from (A) QC sample, or plasma sample after being incubated at 37 °C for (B) 5 min, (C) 15 min, or (D) 60 min.
Figure 4.Biodistribution of 18F-labeled 2 at 1 h post-injection in HT-29 tumor-bearing mice. Values (%ID/g) are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 5).
Figure 5.Representative PET and CT images acquired at 1 h post-injection with 18 F-labeled 2 in HT-29 colorectal cancer xenograft-bearing mice. Arrow indicates location of tumor.
Figure 6.Time activity curves for 18F-labeled 2 using ROIs drawn around high activity organs (A) heart, liver, and kidneys, and low activity organs (B) tumor, bone, muscle, and muscle.