Literature DB >> 28385024

Patient experience midway through a large primary care practice transformation initiative.

Kaylyn E Swankoski1, Deborah N Peikes, Stacy B Dale, Nancy A Clusen, Nikkilyn Morrison, John J Holland, Timothy J Day, Randall S Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine how the multipayer Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative that transforms primary care delivery affects the patient experience of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. The study examines how experience changed between the first and second years of CPC, how ratings of CPC practices have changed relative to ratings of comparison practices, and areas in which practices still have opportunities to improve patient experience. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study using 2 serial cross-sectional samples of more than 25,000 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to 496 CPC practices and nearly 9000 beneficiaries attributed to 792 comparison practices.
METHODS: We analyzed patient experience 8 to 12 months and 21 to 24 months after CPC began, measured using 6 domains of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group 12-Month Survey with Patient-Centered Medical Home supplemental items. We compared changes over time in patients giving the best responses between CPC and comparison practices using a regression-adjusted difference-in-differences analysis.
RESULTS: Patient ratings of care over time were generally comparable for CPC and comparison practices, with slightly more favorable differences-generally of small magnitude-for CPC practices than expected by chance. There were small, statistically significant, favorable effects for 2 of 6 composite measures measured using both the proportion giving the best responses and mean responses: getting timely appointments, care, and information; providers support patients in taking care of their own health; and providers discuss medication decisions. There was an additional small favorable effect on the proportion of patients giving the best response in getting timely appointments, care, and information; there was no effect on the mean.
CONCLUSIONS: During the first 2 years of CPC, CPC practices showed slightly better year-to-year patient experience ratings for selected items, indicating that transformation did not negatively affect patient experience and improved some aspects slightly. Patient ratings for the 2 groups were generally comparable, and both faced substantial room for improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28385024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  4 in total

1.  Association between care delivery interventions to enhance access and patients' perceived access in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.

Authors:  Michelle P Lin; Lisa-Qiao MacDonald; Janel Jin; Ashok Reddy
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2020-02-24

2.  Assessment of patient experience profiles and satisfaction with expectations of treatment effects by using latent class analysis based on a national patient experience survey in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shang-Jyh Chiou; Pei-Chen Lee; Yu-Hsuan Chang; Pei-Shan Huang; Li-Hui Lee; Kuan-Chia Lin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Difficulties faced by patients with chronic diseases in the primary care setting in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Li Jia Koh; Sok Huang Teo; Yilin Jiang; Ern Huei Joel Hwang; Eng Sing Lee
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.331

4.  Does accreditation of general practice promote patient-reported quality of care? A natural cluster randomised experiment.

Authors:  Helle Riisgaard; Frans Boch Waldorff; Merethe Kirstine Andersen; Line Bjørnskov Pedersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.