| Literature DB >> 28384317 |
Jie Yuan1, Lin Hou1,2, Xin Wei1, Zhengchun Shang1,3, Fei Cheng1, Shuoxin Zhang1,2.
Abstract
As an ecological unit, coarse woody debris (CWD) plays an essential role in productivity, nutrient cycling,Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28384317 PMCID: PMC5383274 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The variation in the mean annual temperature and total precipitation at Huoditang forest region from 1996–2013.
The data were sourced from the unpublished Qinling long-term ecological monitoring database.
Fig 2Location of the plots for P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forests on the Huoditang Experimental Forest Farm in the Qinling Mountains (China).
O Weather station; R Plots in Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forest; H Plots in P. armandi forest; HLHJL Mixed forest between oak and birch; LS Picea asperata forest; HSS P. armandi forest; LYS Larix principis-rupprechtii forest; SLHJL Mixed forest between oak and pine; SHHJL Mixed forest between pine and birch; HH Betula albo-sinensis forest; QQ Picea wilsonii forest; RCL Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forest; YS Pinus tabulaeformis forest.
The numbers of CWD samples at various decay times in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forests.
| Distribution zone | Forest types | Decay times (year) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |||
| 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 72 | ||||||||
| 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 73 | |||||||||
| 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 38 | |||||||||||||
| 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 42 | ||||||||||||
The regression model of biomass, volume and height in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forests.
| Forest types | Contents | Regression equation | Correlation coefficient | Reliability of 95% of the estimated accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ln | 0.99763 | 94.24 | ||
| ln | 0.99708 | 95.37 | ||
| ln | 0.96524 | 84.27 | ||
| ln | 0.97832 | 84.45 | ||
| ln | 0.99106 | 89.15 | ||
| ln | 0.99807 | 96.85 | ||
| ln | 0.99392 | 94.99 | ||
| 0.78814 | 95.60 | |||
| ln | 0.99802 | 97.09 | ||
| ln | 0.99698 | 96.73 | ||
| ln | 0.98656 | 90.60 | ||
| ln | 0.98004 | 81.56 | ||
| ln | 0.97927 | 92.13 | ||
| ln | 0.99843 | 96.27 | ||
| ln | 0.99771 | 97.09 | ||
| 0.88076 | 98.52 |
Note: D Diameter at breast height (cm); H Height of tree (m); WS Dry weight of stem (kg); WBA Dry weight of bark (kg); WB Dry weight of branch (kg); WL Dry weight of leaf (kg); WR Dry weight of roots (kg); VS Stem volume (m3); VBA Bark volume (m3).
Fig 3The forest biomass and the percentage of CWD to the forest biomass (the mass of living trees, shrubs, herbs, litter and CWD) in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forests from 1997–2013.
The forest biomass data sources are Chen and Peng [60] and the unpublished Qinling long-term ecological monitoring database. Errors bars are based on plot as experimental unit (N = 3).
Fig 4The variation in annual ICWD in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forests from 1997–2013.
ICWD is the input of CWD mass (when a tree became CWD, we calculated the new CWD mass per year as ICWD). Errors bars are based on plot as experimental unit (N = 3).
Fig 5Decomposition of CWD in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata plots.
The relationship between density and decomposition was simulated using a single exponential decay model.
Fig 6The relationship between the annual mass decay rate and annual temperature in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata forests from 1997–2013.
Fig 7The contents of the chemical elements in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata CWD at different decay times.
Errors bars are based on plot as experimental unit (N = 3).
Fig 8The C/N ratio in the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata CWD at different decay times.
Errors bars are based on plot as experimental unit (N = 3).
Fig 9The contents of the soil chemical elements in the three soil layers under the P. armandi CWD at different decay times.
Errors bars are based on plot as experimental unit (N = 3).
Fig 10The contents of the soil chemical elements in the three soil layers under the Q. aliena var. acuteserrata CWD at different decay times.
Errors bars are based on plot as experimental unit (N = 3).
The contents of the average annual soil chemical elements accumulated under the P. armandi and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata CWD.
| CWD tree species | Soil layers | Average annual accumulation of soil chemical elements (mg·g-1·a-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | ||
| 1.25 a (0.33) | 0.09 a (0.04) | 0.008 a (0.02) | -0.006 a (0.96) | 0.84 a (2.26) | 0.97 a (1.25) | ||
| 0.91 b (0.48) | 0.05 b (0.02) | 0.01 a (0.02) | 0.21 a (0.58) | 0.02 a (2.30) | 0.40 b (0.86) | ||
| 0.39 c (0.21) | 0.02 c (0.03) | 0.002 a (0.03) | -0.007 a (0.69) | 0.59 a (2.64) | 0.26 b (0.66) | ||
| 1.50 a (0.60) | 0.09 a (0.13) | 0.02 a (0.05) | 0.25 a (0.64) | 0.56 a (1.99) | 0.02 a (1.17) | ||
| 0.81 b (0.37) | 0.01 b (0.07) | 0.005 ab (0.03) | 0.22 a (0.85) | 0.10 a (0.99) | -0.05 a (1.75) | ||
| 0.28 c (0.23) | 0.01 b (0.06) | -0.01 b (0.04) | 0.14 a (1.12) | -1.00 b (1.18) | 0.19 a (1.34) | ||
Note: Means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different at P<0.05; the standard errors are provided in parentheses, are based on plot as experimental unit (N = 3).