| Literature DB >> 28384230 |
Junmin Li1, Haiyan Liu1,2,3, Ming Yan2, Leshan Du1,3.
Abstract
Local adaptation is an important mechanism underlying the adaptation of plants to environmental heterogeneity, and the toxicity of salt results in strong selection pressure on salt tolerance in plants and different ecotypes. Solidago canadensis, which is invasive in China, has spread widely and has recently colonized alkali sandy loams with a significant salt content. A common greenhouse experiment was conducted to test the role of local adaptation in the successful invasion of S. canadensis into salty habitats. Salt treatment significantly decreased the growth of S. canadensis, including rates of increase in the number of leaves and plant height; the root, shoot, and total biomass. Furthermore, salt stress significantly reduced the net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and relative chlorophyll content but significantly increased peroxidase activity and the proline content of S. canadensis and the root/shoot ratio. Two-way analysis of variance showed that salt treatment had a significant effect on the physiological traits of S. canadensis, except for the intercellular CO2 concentration, whereas the population and the salt × population interaction had no significant effect on any physiological traits. Most of the variation in plasticity existed within and not among populations, excep for the root/shoot ratio. S. canadensis populations from soil with moderate/high salt levels grew similarly to S. canadensis populations from soils with low salt levels. No significant correlation between salt tolerance indices and soil salinity levels was observed. The plasticity of the proline content, intercellular CO2 concentration and chlorophyll content had significant correlations with the salt tolerance index. These findings indicate a lack of evidence for local adaption in the existing populations of invasive S. canadensis in China; instead, plasticity might be more important than local adaptation in influencing the physiological traits and salt tolerance ability across the S. canadensis distribution.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28384230 PMCID: PMC5383265 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Geographical information, types of land use and soil salinity of Solidago canadensis populations.
| No. | Population abbreviation | Location | Longitude | Latitude | Altitude (m) | Types of land uses | Soil salinity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PD | Pudong District, Shanghai City | E121.804° | N31.354° | 3 | Abandoned farmland | Moderate salinity |
| 2 | TZ | Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province | E121.397° | N28.656° | 6 | Abandoned farmland | Low salinity |
| 3 | NT | Nantong City, Jiangsu Province | E120.843° | N32.070° | 5 | Abandoned farmland | Low salinity |
| 4 | WZ | Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province | E120.607° | N28.126° | 4 | Abandoned farmland | Low salinity |
| 5 | HZ | Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province | E120.297° | N30.161° | 9 | Abandoned farmland | Low salinity |
| 6 | FZ | Fuzhou City, Fujian Province | E119.359° | N26.098° | 19 | Abandoned farmland | Low salinity |
| 7 | LYG | Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province | E119.235° | N34.654° | 3 | Abandoned farmland | Very high salinity |
| 8 | WHu | Wuhu City, Anhui Province | E118.387° | N31.342° | 16 | Garbage dump | Moderate salinity |
| 9 | JDZ | Jingdezheng City, Jiangxi Province | E117.166° | N29.318° | 40 | Green belts | Low salinity |
| 10 | JJ | Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province | E116.283° | N29.985° | 18 | Abandoned vegetable garden | High salinity |
| 11 | WH | Hankou District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province | E114.350° | N30.878° | 25 | Abandoned farmland | Low salinity |
Fig 1Effect of salt treatment on the rate of increase in the number of leaves (a) and plant height (b). Values are shown in mean ± standard error (SE). ***, indicates that the difference between the control and the salt treatment is significant at p<0.001.
Fig 2Effect of salt treatment on root biomass (a) shoot biomass (b) and total biomass (c). Values are shown in mean ± standard error (SE). *, **, ***, indicate that the difference between the control and salt treatment is significant at p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.
Fig 3Effect of salt treatment on the plant height (a) and root (b), shoot (c) and total biomass (d) of S. canadensis populations from moderate/severe salt-level soil and low salt-level soil. Values are shown in mean ± standard error (SE).
Mean ± standard error (SE) of the salt tolerance for each trait of Solidago canadensis and nonparametric correlations with soil salinity levels.
| Population | Plant height | Shoot biomass | Root biomass | Total biomass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | 0.71±0.14 | 0.33±0.03 | 0.59±0.20 | 0.38±0.17 |
| TZ | 0.43±0.03 | 0.43±0.21 | 0.50±0.29 | 0.42±0.26 |
| NT | 0.85±0.10 | 0.94±0.06 | 0.77±0.09 | 0.88±0.08 |
| WZ | 0.50±0.07 | 0.36±0.08 | 0.43±0.06 | 0.34±0.04 |
| HZ | 0.90±0.18 | 0.35±0.14 | 0.39±0.08 | 0.36±0.12 |
| FZ | 0.42±0.01 | 0.47±0.03 | 0.62±0.25 | 0.49±0.08 |
| LYG | 0.54±0.03 | 0.14±0.03 | 0.24±0.07 | 0.18±0.07 |
| WHu | 0.62±0.03 | 0.52±0.18 | 0.47±0.17 | 0.62±0.31 |
| JDZ | 0.58±0.10 | 0.39±0.21 | 0.35±0.16 | 0.39±0.0.21 |
| JJ | 0.72±0.15 | 0.50±0.27 | 0.52±0.30 | 0.50±0.28 |
| WH | 0.57±0.13 | 0.36±0.14 | 0.47±0.19 | 0.37±0.15 |
| Spearman’s rho ( | 0.171 (0.425) | -0.329 (0.116) | -0.207 (0.331) | -0.286 (0.175) |
Mean ± standard error (SE) of each physiological trait under the control and salt treatment and the mean ± SD and differentiation coefficient (Vst) of the phenotypic plasticity index (PPI) for each physiological trait of Solidago canadensis.
Different small letters on the same line indicate that the difference between the control and salt treatment was significant. The results of two-way ANOVA and the population differentiation coefficient are listed.
| Effect of salinity | Phenotypic plasticity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trait | Control (mean±SE) | Salt (mean±SE) | PPI (mean±SD) | |||||
| Proline content | 18.10±15.81a | 342.45±174.94b | 80.61 | 1.30 | 1.05 | 0.69 | 0.93±0.07 | 0.44 |
| Peroxidase activity | 2.10±0.81a | 3.13±1.94b | 7.78 | 0.82 | 1.34 | 1.36 | 0.37±0.23 | 0.48 |
| Net photosynthetic rate | 11.35±1.96a | 6.21±2.57b | 64.16 | 1.83 | 1.09 | 0.71 | 0.47±0.21 | 0.30 |
| Stomatal conductance | 0.70±0.17a | 0.31±0.16b | 89.89 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.29 | 0.56±0.22 | 0.28 |
| Intercellular CO2 concentration | 344.66±7.87a | 341.42±13.79a | 2.53 | 10.11 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.56 |
| Transpiration rate | 7.68±1.41a | 4.97±2.01b | 36.93 | 11.10 | 0.78 | 0.33 | 0.37±0.27 | 0.39 |
| Chlorophyll content | 1.04±0.22a | 0.57±0.18b | 71.26 | 5.57 | 1.31 | 0.34 | 0.46±0.19 | 0.48 |
| Root/shoot ratio | 0.28±0.05b | 0.34±0.06a | 3.75 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.78 | 0.28±0.03 | 0.97 |
Note:
*, *** indicate significance at the 0.05 and 0.001 levels, respectively.
Pearson’s correlation between the plasticity index of physiological traits and the salt tolerance index.
The p values are listed in parentheses. The figures in bold indicate significant correlations.
| Salt tolerance index | Proline content | Peroxidase activity | Net photosynthetic rate | Stomatal conductance | Intercellular CO2 concentration | Transpiration rate | Chlorophyll content | Root/shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total biomass | -0.003(0.987) | -0.125(0.550) | 0.071(0.737) | 0.231(0.266) | 0.196(0.347) | -0.245(0.248) | -0.074(0.724) | |
| Root biomass | -0.099(0.639) | -0.032(0.880) | 0.261(0.208) | 0.325(0.113) | 0.166(0.427) | 0.214(0.304) | -0.192(0.369) | 0.065(0.758) |
| Shoot biomass | -0.020(0.926) | -0.119(0.571) | 0.027(0.899) | 0.197(0.346) | 0.151(0.471) | -0.242(0.254) | -0.014(0.947) | |
| Plant height | 0.163(0.435) | -0.215(0.302) | -0.103(0.625) | -0.135(0.519) | -0.060(0.775) |