| Literature DB >> 28384224 |
Monika R Asnani1, Jennifer Knight Madden1, Marvin Reid2, Lisa-Gaye Greene3, Parris Lyew-Ayee3.
Abstract
There is much variability in the expression of sickle cell disease (SCD) and recent works suggest that environmental and social factors may also influence this variability. This paper aims to use geographic information systems technology to examine the association between socio-environmental exposures and health outcomes in all persons who have attended or currently attend the Sickle Cell Unit in Jamaica. Rural patients presented for clinical care at older ages and had less annual visits to clinic. Persons travelled relatively long distances to seek SCD care and those travelling longer had less health maintenance visits. Urban patients had a higher prevalence of significant pain crises (69.4% vs. 55.8%, p value<0.001) and respiratory events (21.2% vs. 14%, p value<0.001). Prevalence of leg ulcers did not vary between rural and urban patients but was higher in males than in females. Females also had lower odds of having respiratory events but there was no sex difference in history of painful crises. Persons with more severe genotypes lived in higher poverty and travelled longer for healthcare services. Persons in areas with higher annual rainfall, higher mean temperatures and living farther from factories had less painful crises and respiratory events. The paper highlights a need for better access to healthcare services for Jamaicans with SCD especially in rural areas of the island. It also reports interesting associations between environmental climatic exposures and health outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28384224 PMCID: PMC5383275 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Profile of study population by urban/rural residence.
| Variable | Urban | Rural | Total | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 6,097; 71.7%) | (n = 2407; 28.3%) | (n = 8,503) | ||
| 2945 (48.3) | 1184 (49.2) | 4129 (48.6) | 0.46 | |
| 4035 (66.8) | 1752 (73.5) | 5787 (68.7) | ||
| 2, 13 | 24, 18 | 8, 20 | ||
| 0.60±0.17 | 0.76±0.14 | |||
| 0.54±0.32 | 0.39±0.29 | |||
| 16.4±14.8 | 32.3±16.2 | |||
| | ||||
| | 45.1 | 39.7 | 43.5 | |
| | 34.4 | 39.4 | 35.8 | |
| | 13.2 | 13.8 | 13.4 | |
| | 7.3 | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| 0.79, 1.1 | 0.85, 1.1 | 0.81, 1.1 | 0.96 | |
| 2.6, 2.7 | 2,2, 2.1 | 2.5, 2.5 | ||
| 11.2, 16.9 | 8.1, 13.3 | 10.2, 16.1 | ||
| 69.4 | 55.8 | 65.6 | ||
| 0.42, 0.75(n = 4234) | 0.34, 0.58(n = 1344) | 0.40, 0.70 | ||
| 21.2 | 14.0 | 19.1 | ||
| 0.17, 0.36(n = 1290) | 0.16, 0.37(n = 336) | 0.16, 0.36 | 0.13 | |
| 22.0 | 21.0 | 21.8 | 0.33 | |
| 0.29, 0.71(n = 1343) | 0.30, 0.77(n = 506) | 0.29, 0.73 | 0.054 | |
| 30.2±0.9 | 29.6±1.0 | 30.1±1.03 | ||
| 0.04, 0.08 | 0.18, 0.31 | 0.06, 0.14 | ||
| 1.1, 0.45 | 1.76, 0.57 | 1.25, 0.7 | ||
| 0.80, 1.12 | 4.3, 4.8 | 1.2, 4.8 |
Fig 1Distance from a sickle cell clinic in kilometres.
Fig 2Elevation above sea level in metres.
Fig 3Rainfall in millimetres, mean of 30 years.
Multivariate regression models examining predictors of health services utilization in Jamaicans with SCD.
| Poverty | -0.025 (-0.03 to-0.02) | |
| Rural residence | -0.32 (-0.46 to -0.17) | |
| Severe genotype | 1.02 (0.90 to1.14) | |
| Females | -0.07 (-0.18 to 0.04) | |
| Years attending SCU | -0.047 (-0.05to -0.04) | |
| Age at 1st visit to SCU | -0.048(-0.05 to -0.04) | |
| Distance from clinic | -0.004 (-0.008to -0.001) | |
| Poverty | -0.004 (-0.006 to -0.002) | |
| Rural residence | -0.021 (-0.07 to 0.03) | |
| Severe genotype | 0.19 (0.15 to0.23) | |
| Females | 0.04 (-0.001 to 0.07) | |
| Years attending SCU | -0.038 (-0.039 to -0.036) | |
| Age at 1st visit to SCU | -0.03 (-0.03 to-0.028) | |
| Distance from clinic | -0.002 (-0.003 to -0.0002) | |
*p<0.05
**p<0.001
1Reference category is ‘Urban residence’
2Reference category is ‘Mild genotype’
3Reference category is ‘Males’
Logistic regression examining predictors of common clinical outcomes in Jamaicans with SCD.
| <0.001 | Rural residence | 0.70 (0.62 to 0.80) | |
| Severe genotype | 1.57 (1.42 to 1.73) | ||
| Females | 1.00 (0.92 to1.10) | ||
| Annual rainfall | 0.63 (0.57 to 0.71) | ||
| Elevation above ground level | 0.75 (0.49 to 1.15) | ||
| Distance from factories | 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) | ||
| Mean temperature | 0.83 (0.77 to 0.89) | ||
| <0.001 | Rural residence | 0.84 (0.71 to 0.99) | |
| Severe genotype | 1.90 (1.67 to 2.16) | ||
| Females | 0.81 (0.73 to0.90) | ||
| Annual rainfall | 0.60 (0.51 to 0.70) | ||
| Elevation above ground level | 0.70 (0.41 to 1.22) | ||
| Distance from factories | 0.97 (0.94 to 0.99) | ||
| Mean temperature | 0.86 (0.79 to 0.95) | ||
| <0.001 | Rural residence | 0.95 (0.82 to1.11) | |
| Severe genotype | 5.99 (5.01 to 7.08) | ||
| Females | 0.67 (0.60 to 0.75) | ||
| Annual rainfall | 0.80 (0.70 to 0.92) | ||
| Elevation above ground level | 0.99 (0.60 to 1.63) | ||
| Distance from factories | 0.99 (0.97 to 1.01) | ||
| Mean temperature | 0.90 (0.82 to 0.98)* |
*p<0.05
**p<0.01
***p<0.001
1Reference category is ‘Urban residence’
2Reference category is ‘Mild genotype’
3Reference category is ‘Males’