Literature DB >> 28383825

The fibroblast surface markers FAP, anti-fibroblast, and FSP are expressed by cells of epithelial origin and may be altered during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

Zuzana Kahounová1,2, Daniela Kurfürstová3, Jan Bouchal3, Gvantsa Kharaishvili3, Jiří Navrátil4, Ján Remšík1,2,5, Šárka Šimečková1,2,5, Vladimír Študent6, Alois Kozubík1,5, Karel Souček1,2,5.   

Abstract

The identification of fibroblasts and cancer-associated fibroblasts from human cancer tissue using surface markers is difficult, especially because the markers used currently are usually not expressed solely by fibroblasts, and the identification of fibroblast-specific surface molecules is still under investigation. It was aimed to compare three commercially available antibodies in the detection of different surface epitopes of fibroblasts (anti-fibroblast, fibroblast activation protein α, and fibroblast surface protein). The specificity of their expression, employing fibroblast cell lines and tumor-derived fibroblasts from breast and prostate tissues was investigated. Both the established fibroblast cell line HFF-1 and ex vivo primary fibroblasts isolated from breast and prostate cancer tissues expressed the tested surface markers to different degrees. Surprisingly, those markers were expressed also by permanent cell lines of epithelial origin, both benign and cancer-derived (breast-cell lines MCF 10A, HMLE and prostate-cell lines BPH-1, DU 145, and PC-3). The expression of fibroblast activation protein α increased on the surface of previously described models of epithelial cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in response to treatment with TGF-β1. To prove the co-expression of the fibroblast markers on cells of epithelial origin, we used freshly dissociated human prostate and breast cancer tissues. The results confirmed the co-expression of anti-fibroblast and fibroblast surface protein on CD31/CD45-negative/EpCAM-positive epithelial cells. In summary, our data support the findings that the tested fibroblast markers are not fibroblast specific and may be expressed also by cells of epithelial origin (e.g., cells undergoing EMT). Therefore, the expression of these markers should be interpreted with caution, and the combination of several epitopes for both positive (anti-fibroblast or fibroblast activation protein α) and negative (EpCAM) identification of fibroblasts from breast and prostate tumor tissues is advised.
© 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-fibroblast; cancer-associated fibroblasts; epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; fibroblast activation protein α; fibroblast surface protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28383825     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  16 in total

Review 1.  Roles of mesenchymal stromal cells in the head and neck cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Marcelo Coutinho de Miranda; Mariane Izabella Abreu de Melo; Pricila da Silva Cunha; Jovino Gentilini; Jerusa Araújo Quintão Arantes Faria; Michele Angela Rodrigues; Dawidson Assis Gomes
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 6.529

2.  Biological heterogeneity of primary cancer-associated fibroblasts determines the breast cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Marika Musielak; Oliwia Piwocka; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Karolina Ampuła; Beata Adamczyk; Igor Piotrowski; Magdalena Fundowicz; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Wiktoria M Suchorska; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.942

Review 3.  Co-culturing multicellular tumor models: Modeling the tumor microenvironment and analysis techniques.

Authors:  Ariana E Shannon; Claire E Boos; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 4.  Beyond cancer cells: Targeting the tumor microenvironment with gene therapy and armed oncolytic virus.

Authors:  Peter Kok-Ting Wan; Anderson J Ryan; Leonard W Seymour
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 5.  In search of definitions: Cancer-associated fibroblasts and their markers.

Authors:  Martin Nurmik; Pit Ullmann; Fabien Rodriguez; Serge Haan; Elisabeth Letellier
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Oncogenesis, Microenvironment Modulation and Clinical Potentiality of FAP in Glioblastoma: Lessons Learned from Other Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Yixin Shi; Ziren Kong; Penghao Liu; Guozhu Hou; Jiaming Wu; Wenbin Ma; Xin Cheng; Yu Wang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Step-Wise Chondrogenesis of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Purification Via a Reporter Allele Generated by CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing.

Authors:  Shaunak S Adkar; Chia-Lung Wu; Vincent P Willard; Amanda Dicks; Adarsh Ettyreddy; Nancy Steward; Nidhi Bhutani; Charles A Gersbach; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.845

Review 8.  Pro-tumorigenic roles of fibroblast activation protein in cancer: back to the basics.

Authors:  Ellen Puré; Rachel Blomberg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 9.  Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Understanding Their Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Kévin Louault; Rong-Rong Li; Yves A DeClerck
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Transformation of resident notochord-descendent nucleus pulposus cells in mouse injury-induced fibrotic intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Tiffany Y K Au; To-Kam Lam; Yan Peng; Sarah L Wynn; Kenneth M C Cheung; Kathryn S E Cheah; Victor Y L Leung
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 9.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.