T R Shenoy1, G Boysen2,3, M Y Wang4, Q Z Xu4, W Guo4, F M Koh5, C Wang1, L Z Zhang4, Y Wang1, V Gil2, S Aziz2, R Christova2, D N Rodrigues2,3, M Crespo2,3, P Rescigno3, N Tunariu3, R Riisnaes2,3, Z Zafeiriou3, P Flohr2,3, W Yuan2, E Knight2, A Swain2, M Ramalho-Santos5, D Y Xu4, J de Bono2,3, H Wu1,4. 1. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. 2. The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. 3. Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group and Drug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 4. The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. 5. Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research and Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deletion of the chromatin remodeler chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1 (CHD1) is a common genomic alteration found in human prostate cancers (PCas). CHD1 loss represents a distinct PCa subtype characterized by SPOP mutation and higher genomic instability. However, the role of CHD1 in PCa development in vivo and its clinical utility remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To study the role of CHD1 in PCa development and its loss in clinical management, we generated a genetically engineered mouse model with prostate-specific deletion of murine Chd1 as well as isogenic CHD1 wild-type and homozygous deleted human benign and PCa lines. We also developed patient-derived organoid cultures and screened patients with metastatic PCa for CHD1 loss. RESULTS: We demonstrate that CHD1 loss sensitizes cells to DNA damage and causes a synthetic lethal response to DNA damaging therapy in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, in patient-derived organoid cultures and in a patient with metastatic PCa. Mechanistically, CHD1 regulates 53BP1 stability and CHD1 loss leads to decreased error-free homologous recombination (HR) repair, which is compensated by increased error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides the first in vivo and in patient evidence supporting the role of CHD1 in DSB repair and in response to DNA damaging therapy. We uncover mechanistic insights that CHD1 modulates the choice between HR and NHEJ DSB repair and suggest that CHD1 loss may contribute to the genomic instability seen in this subset of PCas.
BACKGROUND: Deletion of the chromatin remodeler chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1 (CHD1) is a common genomic alteration found in human prostate cancers (PCas). CHD1 loss represents a distinct PCa subtype characterized by SPOP mutation and higher genomic instability. However, the role of CHD1 in PCa development in vivo and its clinical utility remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To study the role of CHD1 in PCa development and its loss in clinical management, we generated a genetically engineered mouse model with prostate-specific deletion of murine Chd1 as well as isogenic CHD1 wild-type and homozygous deleted human benign and PCa lines. We also developed patient-derived organoid cultures and screened patients with metastatic PCa for CHD1 loss. RESULTS: We demonstrate that CHD1 loss sensitizes cells to DNA damage and causes a synthetic lethal response to DNA damaging therapy in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, in patient-derived organoid cultures and in a patient with metastatic PCa. Mechanistically, CHD1 regulates 53BP1 stability and CHD1 loss leads to decreased error-free homologous recombination (HR) repair, which is compensated by increased error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides the first in vivo and in patient evidence supporting the role of CHD1 in DSB repair and in response to DNA damaging therapy. We uncover mechanistic insights that CHD1 modulates the choice between HR and NHEJ DSB repair and suggest that CHD1 loss may contribute to the genomic instability seen in this subset of PCas.
Authors: Peter S Nelson; Nigel Clegg; Hugh Arnold; Camari Ferguson; Michael Bonham; James White; Leroy Hood; Biaoyang Lin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-08-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert J Sims; Scott Millhouse; Chi-Fu Chen; Brian A Lewis; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Paul Tempst; James L Manley; Danny Reinberg Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2007-11-30 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Marcela Guzman-Ayala; Michael Sachs; Fong Ming Koh; Courtney Onodera; Aydan Bulut-Karslioglu; Chih-Jen Lin; Priscilla Wong; Rachel Nitta; Jun S Song; Miguel Ramalho-Santos Journal: Development Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: David J Mulholland; Linh M Tran; Yunfeng Li; Houjian Cai; Ashkan Morim; Shunyou Wang; Seema Plaisier; Isla P Garraway; Jiaoti Huang; Thomas G Graeber; Hong Wu Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Xiangzi Han; Lei Zhang; Jinsil Chung; Franklin Mayca Pozo; Amanda Tran; Darcie D Seachrist; James W Jacobberger; Ruth A Keri; Hannah Gilmore; Youwei Zhang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Justin J Lin; Lynn W Lehmann; Giancarlo Bonora; Rupa Sridharan; Ajay A Vashisht; Nancy Tran; Kathrin Plath; James A Wohlschlegel; Michael Carey Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Shunyou Wang; Jing Gao; Qunying Lei; Nora Rozengurt; Colin Pritchard; Jing Jiao; George V Thomas; Gang Li; Pradip Roy-Burman; Peter S Nelson; Xin Liu; Hong Wu Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Laurence H Pearl; Amanda C Schierz; Simon E Ward; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Frances M G Pearl Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Michael A Augello; Deli Liu; Lesa D Deonarine; Brian D Robinson; Dennis Huang; Suzan Stelloo; Mirjam Blattner; Ashley S Doane; Elissa W P Wong; Yu Chen; Mark A Rubin; Himisha Beltran; Olivier Elemento; Andries M Bergman; Wilbert Zwart; Andrea Sboner; Noah Dephoure; Christopher E Barbieri Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Gunther Boysen; Daniel N Rodrigues; Pasquale Rescigno; George Seed; David Dolling; Ruth Riisnaes; Mateus Crespo; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Semini Sumanasuriya; Diletta Bianchini; Joanne Hunt; Deirdre Moloney; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Nina Tunariu; Susana Miranda; Inês Figueiredo; Ana Ferreira; Rossitza Christova; Veronica Gil; Sara Aziz; Claudia Bertan; Flavia M de Oliveira; Mark Atkin; Matthew Clarke; Jane Goodall; Adam Sharp; Theresa MacDonald; Mark A Rubin; Wei Yuan; Christopher E Barbieri; Suzanne Carreira; Joaquin Mateo; Johann S de Bono Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Srinivas R Viswanathan; Gavin Ha; Andreas M Hoff; Jeremiah A Wala; Jian Carrot-Zhang; Christopher W Whelan; Nicholas J Haradhvala; Samuel S Freeman; Sarah C Reed; Justin Rhoades; Paz Polak; Michelle Cipicchio; Stephanie A Wankowicz; Alicia Wong; Tushar Kamath; Zhenwei Zhang; Gregory J Gydush; Denisse Rotem; J Christopher Love; Gad Getz; Stacey Gabriel; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Scott M Dehm; Peter S Nelson; Eliezer M Van Allen; Atish D Choudhury; Viktor A Adalsteinsson; Rameen Beroukhim; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Cell Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 41.582