Y Levinsky1,2, T Berger1,2, A Brameli1,2, T Goldstein1,2, E Akerman1, M Mimouni3, F B Mimouni4, G Amarilyo1,2. 1. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. Department of Pediatrics B, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 4. Department of Neonatology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine publication outcomes of neonatology abstracts presented at Pediatric Academic Society (PAS) meeting, and to analyze variables affecting publication. STUDY DESIGN: All neonatology studies accepted for presentation (oral or poster) at 2008 PAS meeting were identified. A biphasic manual PubMed search of published articles was performed using a pre-designed algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 1078 neonatology abstracts were presented at the meeting, among them 481 (44.62%) published by 2016. Abstracts presented orally versus posters (56.11 versus 42.32%; P<0.001) and basic science versus clinical abstracts (53.08 versus 40.2%; P<0.001) were more likely to be published. Positive or negative results of a study or its sample size did not predict rates of publication. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the abstracts presented at the PAS meeting were published within 8 years. Oral presentations were more likely to be published than posters.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 6 April 2017; doi:10.1038/jp.2017.46.
OBJECTIVE: To examine publication outcomes of neonatology abstracts presented at Pediatric Academic Society (PAS) meeting, and to analyze variables affecting publication. STUDY DESIGN: All neonatology studies accepted for presentation (oral or poster) at 2008 PAS meeting were identified. A biphasic manual PubMed search of published articles was performed using a pre-designed algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 1078 neonatology abstracts were presented at the meeting, among them 481 (44.62%) published by 2016. Abstracts presented orally versus posters (56.11 versus 42.32%; P<0.001) and basic science versus clinical abstracts (53.08 versus 40.2%; P<0.001) were more likely to be published. Positive or negative results of a study or its sample size did not predict rates of publication. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the abstracts presented at the PAS meeting were published within 8 years. Oral presentations were more likely to be published than posters.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 6 April 2017; doi:10.1038/jp.2017.46.
Authors: Kristjan Paulson; Mahwash Saeed; Jennifer Mills; Geoff D E Cuvelier; Rajat Kumar; Colette Raymond; Tracy Robinson; David Szwajcer; Donna Wall; Matthew D Seftel Journal: Blood Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Akash J Patel; Jacob Cherian; Benjamin D Fox; William E Whitehead; Daniel J Curry; Thomas G Luerssen; Andrew Jea Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: F Song; S Parekh; L Hooper; Y K Loke; J Ryder; A J Sutton; C Hing; C S Kwok; C Pang; I Harvey Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Emil L Fosbøl; Philip L Fosbøl; Robert A Harrington; Zubin J Eapen; Eric D Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690