Youngkyu Moon1, Jae Kil Park1, Kyo Young Lee2, Sook Whan Sung1. 1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Visceral pleural invasion is an upstaging factor that increases cancer staging from stage IA to IB for tumours of 3 cm or less. However, lymphatic invasion has not been associated with the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. The purpose of this study was to compare visceral pleural invasion and lymphatic invasion as prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 353 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumours of 3 cm or less. Patients were divided into three groups and compared. Group A contained no invasions; group B contained visceral pleural invasion only and group C had lymphatic invasion only. RESULTS: Group A patients had stage IA, but group B patients had stage IB tumours. However, group C patients had stage IA tumours. The 5-year recurrence-free survival for the three groups was 86.2%, 71.5% and 48.0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between groups A and C (P = 0.001).Survival was not different between groups A and B (P = 0.547). In a multivariate analysis conducted to determine risk factors for recurrence, lymphatic invasion was a significant independent risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.570, P = 0.006). Pleural invasion was not a significant risk factor for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic invasion is a more significant prognostic factor than visceral pleural invasion in NSCLC of 3 cm or less.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Visceral pleural invasion is an upstaging factor that increases cancer staging from stage IA to IB for tumours of 3 cm or less. However, lymphatic invasion has not been associated with the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. The purpose of this study was to compare visceral pleural invasion and lymphatic invasion as prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 353 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumours of 3 cm or less. Patients were divided into three groups and compared. Group A contained no invasions; group B contained visceral pleural invasion only and group C had lymphatic invasion only. RESULTS: Group A patients had stage IA, but group B patients had stage IB tumours. However, group C patients had stage IA tumours. The 5-year recurrence-free survival for the three groups was 86.2%, 71.5% and 48.0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between groups A and C (P = 0.001).Survival was not different between groups A and B (P = 0.547). In a multivariate analysis conducted to determine risk factors for recurrence, lymphatic invasion was a significant independent risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.570, P = 0.006). Pleural invasion was not a significant risk factor for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic invasion is a more significant prognostic factor than visceral pleural invasion in NSCLC of 3 cm or less.
Authors: Won Hyuk Choi; Min Jeong Kim; Jun Ho Park; Jin Gu Kang; Seung In Seo; Hak Yang Kim; Woon Geon Shin Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 4.241