| Literature DB >> 28382690 |
Bo Pan1,2,3,4, Junjun Quan1,2,3,4, Lingjuan Liu2,3,4, Zhongwei Xu1,2,3,4, Jing Zhu2,3,4, Xupei Huang5, Jie Tian1.
Abstract
Cardiac diastolic dysfunction (CDD) is the most common form of cardiovascular disorders, especially in elderly people. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) plays a critical role in the regulation of cardiac function, especially diastolic function. Our previous studies showed that cTnI-low expression induced by histone acetylation modification might be one of the causes that result in diastolic dysfunction in ageing hearts. This study was designed to investigate whether epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) would modify histone acetylation events to regulate cTnI expression and then improve cardiac functions in ageing mice. Our study shows that EGCG improved cardiac diastolic function of aged mice after 8-week treatment. Low expression of cTnI in the ageing hearts was reversed through EGCG treatment. EGCG inhibited the expression of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC3, and the binding levels of HDAC1 in the proximal promoter of cTnI. Acetylated lysine 9 on histone H3 (AcH3K9) levels of cTnI's promoter were increased through EGCG treatment. Additionally, EGCG resulted in an ascent of the binding levels of transcription factors GATA4 and Mef2c with cTnI's promoter. Together, our data indicate that EGCG may improve cardiac diastolic function of ageing mice through up-regulating cTnI by histone acetylation modification. These findings provide new insights into histone acetylation mechanisms of EGCG treatment that may contribute to the prevention of CDD in ageing populations.Entities:
Keywords: HDACs; age-related cardiac diastolic dysfunction; cardiac troponin I; epigallocatechin-3-gallate; histone acetylation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28382690 PMCID: PMC5618683 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Cardiac function evaluation
| Parameters | 18M | 18M + DMSO | 18M + EGCG | 3M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 23.59 ± 1.32 | 23.59 ± 1.32 | 22.83 ± 2.07 | 24.04 ± 1.47 |
| Heart rate (beats/minute) | 478 ± 12 | 489 ± 9 | 483 ± 11 | 479 ± 8 |
| LV end‐diastolic | ||||
| IVS (mm) | 0.91 ± 0.16 | 0.94 ± 0.16 | 0.85 ± 0.23 | 0.92 ± 0.20 |
| LVID (mm) | 3.01 ± 0.48 | 3.07 ± 0.41 | 3.23 ± 0.68 | 3.05 ± 0.43 |
| LV PW (mm) | 0.84 ± 0.28 | 0.85 ± 0.32 | 0.78 ± 0.14 | 0.78 ± 0.09 |
| LV volume (µl) | 36.12 ± 13.14 | 37.01 ± 10.92 | 44.46 ± 21.92 | 37.41 ± 10.39 |
| LV end‐systolic | ||||
| IVS (mm) | 1.72 ± 0.40 | 1.75 ± 0.46 | 1.53 ± 0.16 | 1.64 ± 0.23 |
| LVID (mm) | 1.26 ± 0.18 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 1.49 ± 0.43 | 1.41 ± 0.22 |
| LV PW (mm) | 1.43 ± 0.33 | 1.48 ± 0.36 | 1.45 ± 0.27 | 1.34 ± 0.14 |
| LV volume (μl) | 3.93 ± 1.31 | 4.04 ± 1.11 | 4.71 ± 3.60 | 5.39 ± 1.99 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 88.92 ± 2.44 | 88.93 ± 2.94 | 86.60 ± 3.40 | 85.49 ± 3.47 |
| LV fractional shortening (%) | 57.95 ± 3.52 | 58.15 ± 4.57 | 55.58 ± 5.23 | 53.56 ± 4.57 |
| Stroke volume (µl) | 32.18 ± 12.14 | 33.83 ± 11.25 | 37.60 ± 17.20 | 32.02 ± 9.10 |
| LV mass corrected (mg) | 68.87 ± 26.82 | 74.69 ± 30.47 | 57.86 ± 23.71 | 67.28 ± 18.10 |
| Mitral pulse Doppler | ||||
| E/A | 1.31 ± 0.07 | 1.33 ± 0.06 | 1.60 ± 0.07 | 1.66 ± 0.09 |
| IVRT (ms) | 15.33 ± 0.99 | 15.74 ± 1.09 | 13.21 ± 1.09 | 12.91 ± 1.25 |
| IVCT (ms) | 8.01 ± 0.62 | 8.47 ± 0.77 | 8.43 ± 1.00 | 8.47 ± 1.33 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE for each group. LV, left ventricle; IVS, intraventricular septum; LVID, left ventricular internal diameter; PW, posterior wall thickness of LV; IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time; IVCT, isovolumetric contraction time; EGCG, epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by post hoc Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) tests. *P < 0.05, compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups.
Figure 1EGCG treatment prevents sarcomere dissolution in cardiomyocytes. Red arrow shows sarcomere dissolution in the hearts of 18‐month‐old mice (A 10,000×; B 15,000×); (C and D) the cardiac ultrastructure after EGCG treatment. Scale bars in A and C = 2 μm; B and D = 1 μm. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 2EGCG prevents myocardial apoptosis in ageing hearts. TUNEL assay results showed that EGCG treatment decreased apoptosis myocardial cells in ageing hearts. (A) 18M group; (B) 18M + EGCG group. Blue: DAPI; green: TUNEL. Scale bars, 50 μm. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 3EGCG treatment increases cTnI protein levels in ageing hearts. (A) Western blotting analysis using cTnI and cTnT antibodies. β‐Actin was used as protein loading control. (B) A summary of Western blotting results of cTnI. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. from four separate experiments. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. *P < 0.05 as compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 4EGCG treatment increases cTnI mRNA levels in ageing hearts. The expression pattern of cTnI mRNA in the hearts of mice at various ages and before and after EGCG intervention. The results are expressed as mean ± S.D. from at least three separate experiments. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. *P < 0.05 as compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 5EGCG inhibits class I HDACs mRNA levels in ageing hearts. mRNA levels of HDAC1 (A), HDAC2 (B) and HDAC3 (C) were detected in the four groups. The values of the 3M group are standardized as 1. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. from three separate experiments. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. *P < 0.05 as compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 6EGCG reverses the hypoacetylation of AcH3K9 near the proximal promoter of cTnI in ageing hearts. Acetylation levels of specific lysine 9 amino acid in H3 (AcH3K9) are detected near the promoter of cTnI. The values of the 3M group are standardized as 1. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. from three separate experiments. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. *P < 0.05 as compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 7EGCG inhibits HDAC1 binding levels with cTnI's proximal promoter. Binding levels of HDAC1 (A), HDAC2 (B) and HDAC3 (C) with the cTnI's promoter region were detected in the four groups. The values of the 3M group are standardized as 1. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. from three separate experiments. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. *P < 0.05 as compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 8HDAC1 activity analysis before and after EGCG treatment. The expression pattern of HDAC1 activity in the hearts of mice at various ages and before and after EGCG intervention. The results are expressed as mean ± S.D. from at least five separate experiments. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. *P < 0.05 as compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.
Figure 9EGCG up‐regulates the binding of GATA4 and Mef2c with the proximal promoter regions of cTnI. Transcription factor GATA4 binding with GATA elements of cTnI's promoter is measured in the cardiac samples in mice (A). Transcription factor Mef2c binding with Mef2 element in the promoter of cTnI is measured in cardiac samples in mice (B). Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. from three separate experiments. Statistical significance was determined by anova followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. *P < 0.05 as compared with the 18M + EGCG and 3M groups. EGCG: epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate.