Xiao Long1, Jingjing Zhang2,3, Daming Zhang4, Chao Gao1, Chongwei Chi5, Elan Yang1, Huadan Xue4, Lixin Lang3, Gang Niu3, Zhaohui Zhu6, Fang Li2, Xiaoyuan Chen7. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. 3. Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine (LOMIN), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. 5. Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, Beijing, 100190, China. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. zhuzhh@pumch.cn. 7. Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine (LOMIN), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. shawn.chen@nih.gov.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The popularity of contemporary microsurgical techniques in treatment of lower-limb lymphedema calls for better visualization of the lymphatic system, both preoperatively and intra-operatively. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of a novel combination of 68Ga-NEB positron emission tomography (PET) with magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) in evaluating lymphedema and guiding surgical intervention. METHODS: A total of 11 patients (F 9, M 2, age range 29-69 y) with lower-limb lymphedema classified into stage I to III were recruited. PET acquisition was performed at 30, 60 and 90 min after subcutaneous injection of the albumin-binding radiotracer 68Ga-NEB into the bilateral first web spaces of the feet. All the patients were also subjected to 99mTc-sulfur colloid (SC) lymphoscintigraphy for comparison. Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed using sequences specialized for lymphatic vessel scans. All the patients underwent surgical interventions within a week. The surgical approach includes the use of a linear marker for edema localization and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography with a near-infrared surgical navigation system intra-operatively. RESULTS: Lymph transport in lymphatic channels was clearly observed by visualization of 68Ga-NEB activity in the lymphatic vessels and within lymph nodes for all 11 patients as well as the visualization of the edema section plane with dermal backflow (DB), abnormally increased and disconnected uptake along the lymphatic channels. Preoperative 68Ga-NEB PET combined with MRL provides advantageous three-dimensional images, higher temporal resolution, significantly shorter time lapse before image acquisition after tracer injection and more accurate pathological lymphatic vessel distribution than 99mTc-SC lymphoscintigraphy combined with MRI. CONCLUSION: This study documented an effective imaging pattern to combine 68Ga-NEB PET and MRL in patients with lower-limb lymphedema. This strategy demonstrated significant advantage over 99mTc-SC lymphoscintigraphy/MRL in the evaluation of lymphedema severity, staging and pathological location of lymph vessels to make an individualized treatment plan. Dual 68Ga-NEB PET/MRL is thus recommended before the operation for staging and therapy planning.
OBJECTIVE: The popularity of contemporary microsurgical techniques in treatment of lower-limb lymphedema calls for better visualization of the lymphatic system, both preoperatively and intra-operatively. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of a novel combination of 68Ga-NEB positron emission tomography (PET) with magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) in evaluating lymphedema and guiding surgical intervention. METHODS: A total of 11 patients (F 9, M 2, age range 29-69 y) with lower-limb lymphedema classified into stage I to III were recruited. PET acquisition was performed at 30, 60 and 90 min after subcutaneous injection of the albumin-binding radiotracer 68Ga-NEB into the bilateral first web spaces of the feet. All the patients were also subjected to 99mTc-sulfur colloid (SC) lymphoscintigraphy for comparison. Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed using sequences specialized for lymphatic vessel scans. All the patients underwent surgical interventions within a week. The surgical approach includes the use of a linear marker for edema localization and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography with a near-infrared surgical navigation system intra-operatively. RESULTS: Lymph transport in lymphatic channels was clearly observed by visualization of 68Ga-NEB activity in the lymphatic vessels and within lymph nodes for all 11 patients as well as the visualization of the edema section plane with dermal backflow (DB), abnormally increased and disconnected uptake along the lymphatic channels. Preoperative 68Ga-NEB PET combined with MRL provides advantageous three-dimensional images, higher temporal resolution, significantly shorter time lapse before image acquisition after tracer injection and more accurate pathological lymphatic vessel distribution than 99mTc-SC lymphoscintigraphy combined with MRI. CONCLUSION: This study documented an effective imaging pattern to combine 68Ga-NEB PET and MRL in patients with lower-limb lymphedema. This strategy demonstrated significant advantage over 99mTc-SC lymphoscintigraphy/MRL in the evaluation of lymphedema severity, staging and pathological location of lymph vessels to make an individualized treatment plan. Dual 68Ga-NEB PET/MRL is thus recommended before the operation for staging and therapy planning.
Entities:
Keywords:
68Ga-NEB; Evans blue dye; ICG; Lymphangiography; Lymphedema; PET-MR
Authors: Janine T Hidding; Peter B Viehoff; Carien H G Beurskens; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Philip J van der Wees Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2016-06-23
Authors: Benjamin J Vakoc; Ryan M Lanning; James A Tyrrell; Timothy P Padera; Lisa A Bartlett; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Lance L Munn; Guillermo J Tearney; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain; Brett E Bouma Journal: Nat Med Date: 2009-09-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Saskia van Heumen; Jonas J M Riksen; Wichor M Bramer; Gijs van Soest; Dalibor Vasilic Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Zhantong Wang; Orit Jacobson; Rui Tian; Ronnie C Mease; Dale O Kiesewetter; Gang Niu; Martin G Pomper; Xiaoyuan Chen Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 4.774