Literature DB >> 28381373

The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: A series of 30 mandible sagittal split osteotomy patients.

Juho Suojanen1, Junnu Leikola2, Patricia Stoor3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Virtual surgery combined with patient-specific saw and drill guides and osteosynthesis materials are rapidly spreading from reconstructive surgery to orthognathic surgery. Most commercial partners are already providing computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) wafers and patient-specific saw guides. Clear benefits have been demonstrated for custom-made drill guides combined with individually designed three-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific implants (PSI) as a reposition and fixation system in Le Fort I osteotomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 30 patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) due to class II dento-skeletal deformities with the additional use of drill guides combined with PSI as a fixation and positioning system.
RESULTS: The PSIs fitted bilaterally with total precision in 11 of the 30 patients. In 17 patients, the PSIs were used with some modifications. In 2 of 30 patients, the PSIs could not be used as a fixation due to misfit.
CONCLUSION: Due to unpredictable fitting, the use of PSIs with drill guides alone in BSSO without wafers cannot be recommended. Further studies are needed to evaluate the interfering parts, which seem to be related to condylar positioning and bony interferences at the osteotomy sites.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BSSO; CAD/CAM; Orthognatic surgery; Patient specific implants; Sagittal ramus osteotomy; Sagittal split osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28381373     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current Orthognathic Practice in India: Do We Need to Change?

Authors:  Philip Mathew; Paul C Mathai; Jisha David; Usha Shenoy; Rahul Tiwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-08-17

2.  Application of CAD/CAM technology for surgical treatment of condylar head fractures: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Tetiana Pavlychuk; Denis Chernogorskyi; Yurii Chepurnyi; Andreas Neff; Andrii Kopchak
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-27

Review 3.  3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Adeeb Zoabi; Idan Redenski; Daniel Oren; Adi Kasem; Asaf Zigron; Shadi Daoud; Liad Moskovich; Fares Kablan; Samer Srouji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Efficacy and Cost of Maxillary Patient-Specific Implants in Orthognathic Surgery: A Review of Three Patient Cases.

Authors:  Ho-Hyun Brian Sun; Heshaam Fallah
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Effect of Surface Tooling Techniques of Medical Titanium Implants on Bacterial Biofilm Formation In Vitro.

Authors:  Sonia Sarfraz; Pilvi-Helinä Mäntynen; Marisa Laurila; Juho Suojanen; Juha Saarnio; Sami Rossi; Jani Horelli; Mika Kaakinen; Junnu Leikola; Justus Reunanen
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  Computer-assisted teaching of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Learning curve for condylar positioning.

Authors:  Charles Savoldelli; Emmanuel Chamorey; Georges Bettega
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.