Line E Kirk1,2, Jan S Jørgensen3, Flemming Nielsen1, Philippe Grandjean1,4. 1. 1 Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. 2. 2 Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. 3. 3 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. 4. 4 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate whether a public health intervention using focused dietary advice combined with a hair-mercury analysis can lower neurotoxic methylmercury exposure among pregnant women without decreasing their overall intake of seafood. METHODS: A total of 146 pregnant women were consecutively recruited from the antenatal clinic at a Danish university hospital at their initial ultrasound scan. Dietary advice was provided on avoiding methylmercury exposure from large predatory fish and a hair sample from each participant was analysed for mercury, with the results being communicated shortly thereafter to the women. A dietary questionnaire was filled in. Follow-up three months later included a dietary questionnaire and a repeat hair-mercury analysis. RESULTS: In the follow-up group, 22% of the women had hair-mercury concentrations above a safe limit of 0.58 µg/g at enrolment, decreasing to 8% three months later. Average hair-mercury concentrations decreased by 21%. However, the total seafood intake remained at the same level after three months. CONCLUSIONS: Increased exposure to methylmercury among pregnant women is an important public health concern in Denmark. The observed lowering of hair-mercury concentrations associated with dietary advice corresponds to a substantial public health benefit that probably makes such an intervention highly profitable.
AIMS: To evaluate whether a public health intervention using focused dietary advice combined with a hair-mercury analysis can lower neurotoxic methylmercury exposure among pregnant women without decreasing their overall intake of seafood. METHODS: A total of 146 pregnant women were consecutively recruited from the antenatal clinic at a Danish university hospital at their initial ultrasound scan. Dietary advice was provided on avoiding methylmercury exposure from large predatory fish and a hair sample from each participant was analysed for mercury, with the results being communicated shortly thereafter to the women. A dietary questionnaire was filled in. Follow-up three months later included a dietary questionnaire and a repeat hair-mercury analysis. RESULTS: In the follow-up group, 22% of the women had hair-mercury concentrations above a safe limit of 0.58 µg/g at enrolment, decreasing to 8% three months later. Average hair-mercury concentrations decreased by 21%. However, the total seafood intake remained at the same level after three months. CONCLUSIONS: Increased exposure to methylmercury among pregnant women is an important public health concern in Denmark. The observed lowering of hair-mercury concentrations associated with dietary advice corresponds to a substantial public health benefit that probably makes such an intervention highly profitable.
Authors: Clifton Dassuncao; Xindi C Hu; Flemming Nielsen; Pál Weihe; Philippe Grandjean; Elsie M Sunderland Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Jean-Pierre Bourguignon; Anne-Simone Parent; Jos C S Kleinjans; Tim S Nawrot; Greet Schoeters; Nicolas Van Larebeke Journal: Environ Health Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Niladri Basu; Milena Horvat; David C Evers; Irina Zastenskaya; Pál Weihe; Joanna Tempowski Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Adam M Schaefer; Matthew Zoffer; Luke Yrastorza; Daniel M Pearlman; Gregory D Bossart; Ruel Stoessel; John S Reif Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Noelia Domínguez-Morueco; Susana Pedraza-Díaz; María Del Carmen González-Caballero; Marta Esteban-López; Mercedes de Alba-González; Andromachi Katsonouri; Tiina Santonen; Ana Cañas-Portilla; Argelia Castaño Journal: Toxics Date: 2022-07-28