| Literature DB >> 28380451 |
Ya-Ning Zhao1, Jian-Min Li2, Chang-Xiang Chen1, Shu-Xing Li1, Cheng-Jing Xue2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We discussed the intensity of treadmill running on learning, memory and expression of cell cycle-related proteins in rats with cerebral ischemia.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral ischemia; cyclin A; cyclin E; learning and memory; treadmill running
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28380451 PMCID: PMC5522194 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The effect of treadmill running on brain neurons of rats between the groups (400×)
Note: (A) Normal group; (B) Model group at 6h; (C) Model group at 48h; (D) IntensityIgroup at 6h; (E) IntensityIgroup at 48h; (F) IntensityII group at 6h; (G) IntensityII group at 48h. The arrow shows the dead nerve cells.
Comparison of percentage of surviving hippocampal neurons in each group (x¯±s, %)
| Group | 3h | 6h | 24h | 48h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 5 | 97.67 ± 1.53 | 98.33 ± 1.53 | 97.67 ± 1.52 | 97.67 ± 1.52 |
| Model group | 5 | 83.67 ± 1.52① | 76.33 ± 1.50① | 69.00 ± 1.00① | 60.22 ± 2.13① |
| Intensity I group | 5 | 90.33 ± 1.54①② | 84.67 ± 1.53①② | 77.65 ± 1.32①② | 70.23 ± 2.02①② |
| Intensity II group | 5 | 75.53±1.53①②③ | 69.86±1.52①②③ | 61.47±1.22①②③ | 52.36±2.08①②③ |
Figure 2The effect of treadmill running on trajectories in the water maze of rats in each group
Note: (A) Normal group; (B) Model group at 48h; (C) IntensityIgroup at 48h; (D) Intensity II group at 48h.
Results of water maze test in each group (x¯±s)
| Group | n | Latency | Number of passes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 5 | 9.08 ± 2.64 | 11.90 ± 1.45 | |
| Model group | 5 | 33.08 ± 5.85① | 4.00 ± 0.67① | |
| Intensity I group | 5 | 24.20 ± 4.66①② | 6.30 ± 1.16①② | |
| Intensity II group | 5 | 44.12±4.98①②③ | 2.01±1.06①②③ | |
Figure 3The effect of treadmill running on hippocampal expressions of cyclin A in each group (400×)
Note: (A) Normal group; (B) Model group at 6h; (C) Model group at 48h; (D) Intensity I group at 6h; (E) Intensity I group at 48h; (F) Intensity II group at 6h; (G) IntensityII group at 48h. The arrow shows immune positive nerve cell.
Comparison of number of cyclin A-positive cells in each group (x¯±s, cells/high-power field of vision)
| Group | 3h | 6h | 24h | 48h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 5 | 6.20 ± 0.42 | 6.20 ± 0.42 | 6.40 ± 0.43 | 6.40 ± 0.43 |
| Model group | 5 | 8.40 ± 0.52① | 11.70 ± 1.06① | 15.50 ± 0.53①* | 22.40 ± 0.52① |
| Intensity I group | 5 | 7.89 ±0.43①② | 10.67 ±1.01①② | 13.42 ±0.48①② | 20.65 ±0.41①② |
| Intensity II group | 5 | 10.60 ± 0.84①②③ | 16.70 ± 0.68①②③ | 24.50 ± 0.53①②③ | 36.20 ± 1.40①②③ |
Figure 4The effect of treadmill running on hippocampal expressions of cyclin E in each group (400×)
Note: (A) Normal group; (B) Model group at 6h; (C) Model group at 48h; (D) Intensity I group at 6h; (E) IntensityI group at 48h; (F) Intensity II group at 6h; (G) IntensityII group at 48h. The arrow shows immune positive nerve cell.
Comparison of number of cyclin E-positive cells in each group (x¯±s, cells/high-power field of vision)
| Group | 3h | 6h | 24h | 48h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 5 | 7.90 ± 0.74 | 7.80 ± 1.23 | 7.50 ± 1.27 | 7.50 ± 1.27 |
| Model group | 5 | 20.30 ± 0.48① | 15.20 ± 0.63① | 10.00 ± 0.82① | 7.70 ± 0.68① |
| Intensity I group | 5 | 16.42±0.53①② | 11.36±0.58①② | 8.65±0.72①② | 6.90±0.45①② |
| Intensity II group | 5 | 31.60 ± 0.70①②③ | 24.50 ± 0.70①②③ | 16.80 ± 0.63①②③ | 9.10 ± 0.74①②③ |
Figure 5Experimental design and grouping