Suguru Yamashita1, Yun-Shin Chun1, Scott E Kopetz2, Dipen Maru3, Claudius Conrad1, Thomas A Aloia1, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey1. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 2. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic impact of co-existence of APC and PIK3CA mutations in patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). BACKGROUND: Co-occurring genetic events have been shown to drive carcinogenesis in multiple malignancies. METHODS: We identified 396 patients with primary colorectal cancer and known somatic mutation status by next-generation sequencing who underwent hepatectomy for CLM (2005-2015). Survival after hepatectomy in patients with double mutation of APC and PIK3CA and others was analyzed. Predictors of pathologic response and survival were determined. The prognostic value of double mutation was evaluated with a separate cohort of 157 patients with CLM undergoing chemotherapy alone. RESULTS: Forty-five patients had double mutation of APC and PIK3CA; 351 did not. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after hepatectomy were worse in patients with double mutation (3-year RFS, 3.1% vs 20% [P < 0.001]; 3-year OS, 44% vs 84% [P < 0.001]). Independent predictors of major pathologic response were bevacizumab use (odds ratio [OR] 2.22; P = 0.001), tumor size <3 cm (OR 1.97; P = 0.004), wild-type RAS (OR 2.00; P = 0.003), and absence of double mutation (OR 2.91; P = 0.002). Independent predictors of worse OS were primary advanced T category (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12; P = 0.021), RAS mutation (HR 1.74; P = 0.015), and double mutation (HR 3.09; P < 0.001). In the different medical cohort, patients with double mutation had worse 3-year OS of 18%, compared with 35% without double mutation (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Double mutation of APC and PIK3CA predicts inferior response to preoperative chemotherapy and poor survival in patients with CLM.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic impact of co-existence of APC and PIK3CA mutations in patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). BACKGROUND: Co-occurring genetic events have been shown to drive carcinogenesis in multiple malignancies. METHODS: We identified 396 patients with primary colorectal cancer and known somatic mutation status by next-generation sequencing who underwent hepatectomy for CLM (2005-2015). Survival after hepatectomy in patients with double mutation of APC and PIK3CA and others was analyzed. Predictors of pathologic response and survival were determined. The prognostic value of double mutation was evaluated with a separate cohort of 157 patients with CLM undergoing chemotherapy alone. RESULTS: Forty-five patients had double mutation of APC and PIK3CA; 351 did not. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after hepatectomy were worse in patients with double mutation (3-year RFS, 3.1% vs 20% [P < 0.001]; 3-year OS, 44% vs 84% [P < 0.001]). Independent predictors of major pathologic response were bevacizumab use (odds ratio [OR] 2.22; P = 0.001), tumor size <3 cm (OR 1.97; P = 0.004), wild-type RAS (OR 2.00; P = 0.003), and absence of double mutation (OR 2.91; P = 0.002). Independent predictors of worse OS were primary advanced T category (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12; P = 0.021), RAS mutation (HR 1.74; P = 0.015), and double mutation (HR 3.09; P < 0.001). In the different medical cohort, patients with double mutation had worse 3-year OS of 18%, compared with 35% without double mutation (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Double mutation of APC and PIK3CA predicts inferior response to preoperative chemotherapy and poor survival in patients with CLM.
Authors: Georgios Antonios Margonis; Martin E Kreis; Jaeyun Jane Wang; Carsten Kamphues; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 7.293
Authors: Raja R Narayan; Jashodeep Datta; Debra A Goldman; Victoria G Aveson; Henry S Walch; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Mithat Gönen; Vinod P Balachandran; Jeffrey A Drebin; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Alice C Wei; Nikolaus Schultz; Nancy E Kemeny; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Yun Shin Chun; Guillaume Passot; Suguru Yamashita; Maliha Nusrat; Panagiotis Katsonis; Jonathan M Loree; Claudius Conrad; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Lianchun Xiao; Thomas A Aloia; Cathy Eng; Scott E Kopetz; Olivier Lichtarge; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Raja R Narayan; Victoria G Aveson; Joanne F Chou; Henry S Walch; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Gustavo Dos Santos Fernandes; Vinod P Balachandran; Michael I D'Angelica; Jeffrey A Drebin; William R Jarnagin; Alice C Wei; Andrea Cercek; Mithat Gönen; Nikolaus Schultz; T Peter Kingham Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-23 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Giovanni Mauri; Lorenzo Monfardini; Andrea Garnero; Maria Giulia Zampino; Franco Orsi; Paolo Della Vigna; Guido Bonomo; Gianluca Maria Varano; Marco Busso; Carlo Gazzera; Paolo Fonio; Andrea Veltri; Marco Calandri Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 6.639