Federico Giuseppe Usuelli1, Camilla Maccario1,2, Chiara Ursino3, Nicola Serra4, Riccardo D'Ambrosi1,2. 1. 1 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, UO CASCO, Piede e Caviglia, Milan, Italy. 2. 2 Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 3. 3 Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. 4. 4 Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess the functional and radiologic outcomes after AT-AMIC (arthroscopic talus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis) in 2 weight groups of patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs): patients with BMI <25 (Healthy Weight Group [HG]) and with BMI ≥25 (Overweight Group [OG]). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were evaluated. HG was composed of 21 patients (BMI = 21.90 ± 1.94), whereas OG consisted of 16 patients (BMI = 27.41 ± 1.98). All patients were treated with AT-AMIC repair for OLTs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), Visual Analgoue Scale (VAS) for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle and Hindfoot score and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) were administered preoperatively (T0) and at 6 (T1), 12 (T2), and 24 (T3) months postoperatively. RESULTS: In both groups, we found a significant difference for clinical and radiologic parameters with analysis of variance for repeated measures through 4 time points ( P < .001). In HG, AOFAS increased at every follow-up ( P < .05), whereas in OG, AOFAS improved only between T2 and T3 ( P = .0104). In OG we found a significant difference comparing CT and MRI at each follow-up; in HG this difference was found only at T0 ( P < .0001) and T1 ( P = .0492). Finally, OG presented a significantly larger lesion measured with MRI at T0 ( P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: OLTs in overweight patients were characterized by a larger preoperative size. At final follow-up, both groups showed a significant clinical improvement. AT-AMIC can be considered a safe and reliable procedure, regardless of weight, with a significant improvement also in quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess the functional and radiologic outcomes after AT-AMIC (arthroscopic talus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis) in 2 weight groups of patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs): patients with BMI <25 (Healthy Weight Group [HG]) and with BMI ≥25 (Overweight Group [OG]). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were evaluated. HG was composed of 21 patients (BMI = 21.90 ± 1.94), whereas OG consisted of 16 patients (BMI = 27.41 ± 1.98). All patients were treated with AT-AMIC repair for OLTs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), Visual Analgoue Scale (VAS) for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle and Hindfoot score and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) were administered preoperatively (T0) and at 6 (T1), 12 (T2), and 24 (T3) months postoperatively. RESULTS: In both groups, we found a significant difference for clinical and radiologic parameters with analysis of variance for repeated measures through 4 time points ( P < .001). In HG, AOFAS increased at every follow-up ( P < .05), whereas in OG, AOFAS improved only between T2 and T3 ( P = .0104). In OG we found a significant difference comparing CT and MRI at each follow-up; in HG this difference was found only at T0 ( P < .0001) and T1 ( P = .0492). Finally, OG presented a significantly larger lesion measured with MRI at T0 ( P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: OLTs in overweight patients were characterized by a larger preoperative size. At final follow-up, both groups showed a significant clinical improvement. AT-AMIC can be considered a safe and reliable procedure, regardless of weight, with a significant improvement also in quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study.
Entities:
Keywords:
ankle arthroscopy; autologous matrix–induced chondrogenesis; body mass index; bone marrow edema; osteochondral talar lesions; quality of life
Authors: Oliver Gottschalk; Sebastian Felix Baumbach; Sebastian Altenberger; Daniel Körner; Matthias Aurich; Christian Plaass; Sarah Ettinger; Daniel Guenther; Christoph Becher; Hubert Hörterer; Markus Walther Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Arnd F Viehöfer; Fabio Casari; Felix W A Waibel; Silvan Beeler; Florian B Imhoff; Stephan H Wirth; Jakob Ackermann Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Pascal R van Diepen; Jari Dahmen; J Nienke Altink; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 4.634