Ashraf H Ahmed1, Richard D Gordon1, Gregory Ward2, Martin Wolley1, Brett C McWhinney3, Jacobus P Ungerer3, Michael Stowasser1. 1. Endocrine Hypertension Research Centre, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Greenslopes and Princess Alexandra Hospitals, Brisbane 4102, Australia. 2. Sullivan & Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane 4068, Australia. 3. Department of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane 4029, Australia.
Abstract
Background: Plasma aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) is the most popular screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). Because both estrogen and progesterone (including in oral contraceptive agents) affect aldosterone and renin levels, we studied the effects of combined hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on ARR; renin was measured as both direct renin concentration (DRC) and plasma renin activity (PRA). Methods: Fifteen normotensive, healthy postmenopausal women underwent measurement (seated, midmorning) of plasma aldosterone, DRC, PRA, electrolytes, and creatinine and urinary aldosterone, cortisol, electrolytes, and creatinine at baseline and after 2 weeks and 6 weeks of treatment with combined HRT (conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg and medroxyprogesterone 2.5 mg daily). Results: Combined HRT was associated with statistically significant increases in aldosterone [median (range): baseline, 150 (85 to 600); 2 weeks, 230 (129 to 790); 6 weeks, 434 (200 to 1200) pmol/L; P < 0.001 (Friedman test)] and PRA [2.3 (1.2 to 4.3), 3.8 (1.4 to 7.0), 5.1 (1.4 to 10.8) ng/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001] but decreases in DRC [21 (10 to 31), 21 (10 to 39), and 14 (8.0 to 30) mU/L, respectively; P < 0.01], leading to increases in ARR calculated by DRC [7.8 (3.6 to 34.8), 11.4 (5.4 to 48.5), and 30.4 (10.5 to 90.2), respectively; P < 0.001]. The ARR calculated by DRC exceeded the cutoff value (70) in three patients after 6 weeks. There were no significant changes in ARR calculated by PRA [79 (26 to 184), 91 (23 to 166), and 88 (50 to 230), respectively; P = 0.282], plasma electrolytes and creatinine, or any urinary measurements. Conclusion: The combined oral HRT used in this study is capable of significantly increasing ARR with a risk of false-positive results during screening for PA but only if DRC (and not PRA) is used to calculate the ratio.
Background: Plasma aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) is the most popular screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). Because both estrogen and progesterone (including in oral contraceptive agents) affect aldosterone and renin levels, we studied the effects of combined hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on ARR; renin was measured as both direct renin concentration (DRC) and plasma renin activity (PRA). Methods: Fifteen normotensive, healthy postmenopausal women underwent measurement (seated, midmorning) of plasma aldosterone, DRC, PRA, electrolytes, and creatinine and urinary aldosterone, cortisol, electrolytes, and creatinine at baseline and after 2 weeks and 6 weeks of treatment with combined HRT (conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg and medroxyprogesterone 2.5 mg daily). Results: Combined HRT was associated with statistically significant increases in aldosterone [median (range): baseline, 150 (85 to 600); 2 weeks, 230 (129 to 790); 6 weeks, 434 (200 to 1200) pmol/L; P < 0.001 (Friedman test)] and PRA [2.3 (1.2 to 4.3), 3.8 (1.4 to 7.0), 5.1 (1.4 to 10.8) ng/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001] but decreases in DRC [21 (10 to 31), 21 (10 to 39), and 14 (8.0 to 30) mU/L, respectively; P < 0.01], leading to increases in ARR calculated by DRC [7.8 (3.6 to 34.8), 11.4 (5.4 to 48.5), and 30.4 (10.5 to 90.2), respectively; P < 0.001]. The ARR calculated by DRC exceeded the cutoff value (70) in three patients after 6 weeks. There were no significant changes in ARR calculated by PRA [79 (26 to 184), 91 (23 to 166), and 88 (50 to 230), respectively; P = 0.282], plasma electrolytes and creatinine, or any urinary measurements. Conclusion: The combined oral HRT used in this study is capable of significantly increasing ARR with a risk of false-positive results during screening for PA but only if DRC (and not PRA) is used to calculate the ratio.
Authors: Gian Paolo Rossi; Valeria Bisogni; Alessandra Violet Bacca; Anna Belfiore; Maurizio Cesari; Antonio Concistrè; Rita Del Pinto; Bruno Fabris; Francesco Fallo; Cristiano Fava; Claudio Ferri; Gilberta Giacchetti; Guido Grassi; Claudio Letizia; Mauro Maccario; Francesca Mallamaci; Giuseppe Maiolino; Dario Manfellotto; Pietro Minuz; Silvia Monticone; Alberto Morganti; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Paolo Mulatero; Aurelio Negro; Gianfranco Parati; Martino F Pengo; Luigi Petramala; Francesca Pizzolo; Damiano Rizzoni; Giacomo Rossitto; Franco Veglio; Teresa Maria Seccia Journal: Int J Cardiol Hypertens Date: 2020-04-15
Authors: Rawan M Alnazer; Gregory P Veldhuizen; Abraham A Kroon; Peter W de Leeuw Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 3.738