Literature DB >> 28379458

Mid-term results of bicuspid aortic valve repair guided by morphology and function assessment.

Khalil Fattouch1,2, Marco Moscarelli3, Sebastiano Castrovinci1, Giacomo Murana4, Pietro Dioguardi1, Francesco Guccione1, Giuseppe Nasso3, Giuseppe Speziale3, Patrizio Lancellotti5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is frequently associated with aortic insufficiency (AI) due to cusp disease and/or aortic root dilatation. Based on functional classification and morphology, a systematic surgical approach was used for aortic valve repair (AVr).
METHODS: From 2004 to 2014, 152 consecutive patients (mean age 55 ± 7 years) with BAV underwent AVr with or without concomitant aortic root surgery. Cusp pathology was treated with central plication in 60 (39.5%) patients, free edge reinforcement in 45 (29.6%), triangular resection in 28 (18.4%) and pericardial patch in 19 (12.5%). Aortic root dilatation was corrected with valve sparing reimplantation in 65 patients. Mean follow-up was 68 ± 36 months.
RESULTS: In-hospital death was 1.3%. Overall 5-year survival was 88.6 ± 3.6%. Freedom from recurrent ≥ grade 2 AI requiring reoperation at 5-year was 93 ± 3.1%. Five-year freedom from reintervention was 98.4 ± 1.6%, 93.3 ± 6.4% and 82.6 ± 9.6 in the group of patients treated with AVr and reimplantation technique, AVr and subcommissural plasty and AVr repair alone (log-rank P  = 0.005). Commissural orientation <160°, type 2 Siever's BAV and preoperative annulus diameter >29 mm were identified as predictors for recurrent ≥ grade 2 AI.
CONCLUSIONS: BAV repair could be achieved with low incidence of recurrent AI, especially when concomitant annulus stabilization was performed. Systematic preoperative morphological and functional characteristics of the aortic valve should be carried out in order to reduce the risk of repair failure.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic root replacement; Aortic valve; Echocardiography; Repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28379458     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Steffen Bargenda; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Commissural repositioning in bicuspid aortic valve repair with Valsalva graft.

Authors:  Monica Contino; Andrea Mangini; Claudia Romagnoni; Carlo Antona
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-04-10

Review 3.  Bicuspid aortic valve repair: systematic review on long-term outcomes.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Ibrahim Sultan; Mary Siki; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-05

4.  Comparison of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Radosław Gocoł; Jarosław Bis; Marcin Malinowski; Joanna Ciosek; Damian Hudziak; Łukasz Morkisz; Marek Jasiński; Marek A Deja
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Surgical treatment of mild to moderately dilated ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: the art of safety and simplicity.

Authors:  Peng Zhu; Pengyu Zhou; Xiao Ling; Bright Eric Ohene; Xiao Ming Bian; Xiaoxiao Jiang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.