Pamela Nadash1, Pamela Doty2, Matthias von Schwanenflügel3. 1. Associate Professor of Gerontology, and Fellow, Gerontology Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston. 2. Senior Policy Analyst, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia. 3. Director, Aging Divison, Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since 1995, Germany has operated one of the longest-running public programs providing universal support for the cost of long term services and supports (LTSS). Its self-funding, social insurance approach provides basic supports to nearly all Germans. We discuss its design and development, including recent reforms expanding the program and ensuring its ongoing sustainability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study reviews legislative and programmatic changes, using program data, as well as legislative documents and program reports. RESULTS: The program is widely accepted among citizens and has achieved many of its original goals: ensuring access to LTSS and reducing reliance on the locally-funded safety-net social assistance program, which can be used to cover nursing home costs. It also strengthened the LTSS provider infrastructure and expanded access to home care. Recent reforms have addressed some of the program's key issues: the benefit's decreasing value, the eligibility and benefit structure that largely excluded cognitive impairment, and the program's longer-term financial sustainability-particularly its ability to sustain newly expanded benefits, which provide stronger protections to caregivers, index-link benefits, and more systematically incorporate cognitive impairment via a new assessment system. It has addressed financing issues by increasing premiums, introducing subsidies for the purchase of private insurance, and creating a "demographic reserve fund." DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The reforms constitute a significant strengthening of the program, remarkable in an era of retrenchment. Overall, the program provides evidence for the financial viability of a social insurance model, although longer-term challenges may yet arise.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since 1995, Germany has operated one of the longest-running public programs providing universal support for the cost of long term services and supports (LTSS). Its self-funding, social insurance approach provides basic supports to nearly all Germans. We discuss its design and development, including recent reforms expanding the program and ensuring its ongoing sustainability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study reviews legislative and programmatic changes, using program data, as well as legislative documents and program reports. RESULTS: The program is widely accepted among citizens and has achieved many of its original goals: ensuring access to LTSS and reducing reliance on the locally-funded safety-net social assistance program, which can be used to cover nursing home costs. It also strengthened the LTSS provider infrastructure and expanded access to home care. Recent reforms have addressed some of the program's key issues: the benefit's decreasing value, the eligibility and benefit structure that largely excluded cognitive impairment, and the program's longer-term financial sustainability-particularly its ability to sustain newly expanded benefits, which provide stronger protections to caregivers, index-link benefits, and more systematically incorporate cognitive impairment via a new assessment system. It has addressed financing issues by increasing premiums, introducing subsidies for the purchase of private insurance, and creating a "demographic reserve fund." DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The reforms constitute a significant strengthening of the program, remarkable in an era of retrenchment. Overall, the program provides evidence for the financial viability of a social insurance model, although longer-term challenges may yet arise.
Authors: Rieke Schnakenberg; Alexander Maximilian Fassmer; Katharina Allers; Falk Hoffmann Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 3.113
Authors: Gesine van Mark; Sascha R Tittel; Reinhard Welp; Jörg Gloyer; Stefan Sziegoleit; Ralf Barion; Peter M Jehle; Dieter Erath; Peter Bramlage; Stefanie Lanzinger Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2021-06
Authors: Andrew Kingston; Pia Wohland; Raphael Wittenberg; Louise Robinson; Carol Brayne; Fiona E Matthews; Carol Jagger Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Alexander Maximilian Fassmer; Alexandra Pulst; Guido Schmiemann; Falk Hoffmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.390