Literature DB >> 28378768

A novel label-free fluorescence assay for one-step sensitive detection of Hg2+ in environmental drinking water samples.

Ya Li1,2, Nan Liu1,2,3,4, Hui Liu1, Yu Wang1, Yuwei Hao1, Xinhua Ma2, Xiaoli Li2, Yapeng Huo2, Jiahai Lu3, Shuge Tang2,4, Caiqin Wang1,2, Yinhong Zhang1, Zhixian Gao2.   

Abstract

A novel label-free fluorescence assay for detection of Hg2+ was developed based on the Hg2+-binding single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and SYBR Green I (SG I). Differences from other assays, the designed rich-thymine (T) ssDNA probe without fluorescent labelling can be rapidly formed a T-Hg2+-T complex and folded into a stable hairpin structure in the presence of Hg2+ in environmental drinking water samples by facilitating fluorescence increase through intercalating with SG I in one-step. In the assay, the fluorescence signal can be directly obtained without additional incubation within 1 min. The dynamic quantitative working ranges was 5-1000 nM, the determination coefficients were satisfied by optimization of the reaction conditions. The lowest detection limit of Hg2+ was 3 nM which is well below the standard of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This method was highly specific for detecting of Hg2+ without being affected by other possible interfering ions from different background compositions of water samples. The recoveries of Hg2+ spiked in these samples were 95.05-103.51%. The proposed method is more viable, low-costing and simple for operation in field detection than the other methods with great potentials, such as emergency disposal, environmental monitoring, surveillance and supporting of ecological risk assessment and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28378768      PMCID: PMC5380999          DOI: 10.1038/srep45974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Heavy metal ion-based pollution has become a critical global issue and a major source of human exposure stems from contaminated natural waters and potable water123. Particularly, mercury is a highly toxic heavy metal that severely threatens the human health45. Inorganic mercury, i.e., Hg and Hg2+ are released into environments through a variety of anthropogenic and natural sources. Industrial sources of mercury include coal and gold mining, solid waste incineration, wood pulping, fossil fuel combustion, and chemical manufacturing678. Additional sources of human exposure to mercury include the household9 and workplace10, religious practices11, dental amalgams121314, and vaccines1516. Furthermore, Hg2+ is not readily able to be biodegraded and is cline to be accumulated in organisms, which causes diverse human diseases such as kidney failure, prenatal brain damage, cognitive and motion disorders, vision and hearing loss, and even death1718. It is also a neurotoxin and causes immune system dysfunction919. Based on the serious harms of Hg2+ to human health and the green environments, it is quite necessary to develop a rapid and low-cost method for detection of Hg2+ with high sensitivity and selectivity. Conventional quantitative approaches for Hg2+ analysis in water samples include inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)19, atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS)20, atomic absorption spectroscopy21, fluorescent spectrophotometry22 and X-ray absorption spectroscopy23, etc. However, these methods usually involve sophisticated instruments, complicated sample preparation, large sample volume and professional training for operation, which limiting their widespread application. Therefore, the development of novel method for Hg2+ detection that are sensitive, selective, cost-effective, rapid, facile and applicable to the environmental and biological milieus is an important technological supporting for Hg2+ contamination control and disposition. SYBR Green I (SG I) is acted as one of the fluorescent dyes, has become gradually significant for a wide range of analytic and diagnostic fields2425. Since its introduction, SG I has been applied productively in the detection of nucleic acids in gels26, fluorescence imaging techniques27, real-time PCR28 and biochip applications29, etc. It tends to bind into the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and can be excited out bright fluorescence signal, neither of the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) which only excited out weak fluorescence signal. The real formation of SG I is seldom reported, while the patent 565875130 of United States explicates that, the core structure of SG I is on the basis of a monomeric unsymmetrical cyanine dye comprising an N-alkylated benzothiazolium or benzoxazolium ring system, which is bound by a monomethine bridge to a pyridinium or quinolinium ring system that carries a substituent with a heteroatom. The concrete concentration of 10,000× is very likely to be 10 mg mL−1 (19.6 mM)31. It reported that SG I exhibits fluorescence via surface or groove binding by comparing other dsDNA-specific dyes32, the other study showed that the fluorescence from SG I interaction with dsDNA depends on the ratio of base pair/SG I molecule complexes33. The exact mechanisms that how SG I linking/coupling to dsDNA still remains to be unknown. Ono’s group initially confirmed that Hg2+ can specifically interact with Ts to form a T-Hg2+-T complex for the designing of molecular beacon34. According to the above principles, we designed a novel label-free fluorescence assay for one-step and rapid detection of Hg2+ in environmental drinking water samples by forming a stable hairpin structure of the Hg-binding ssDNA and the interaction of SG I and the ssDNA resulted in strong fluorescence in the present of Hg2+. The proposed method is sensitive, convenient, rapid and economic, and meet the requirements of field detection.

Results

Strategy for Hg2+ detection

In this study, we designed a T-rich ssDNA i.e., the Hg-binding ssDNA which containing of 24 bases with seven T-T mismatches, guanine (G) or cytosine (C) base was in either end of the ssDNA. In the absence of Hg2+, the ssDNA adopted a random coil structure, there was only a weak fluorescence by the addition of SG I. By means of the computational molecular simulation for structure display and free energy determination by Mfold, ΔGHairpin loop = 2.98 KJ/mol, ΔGExternal loop = −0.49 KJ/mol (Fig. S1). It suggests that the secondary construct of Hg-binding ssDNA is stable enough that the values of ΔGs are low35 which is not very likely to be formed in dsDNA by self-hybridization and not able to cause false positive results. It demonstrated in Fig. 1 that in the presence of Hg2+, hence the formation of T-Hg2+-T (Fig. S2), the ssDNA can be rapidly formed a T-Hg2+-T complex and folded into a stable hairpin structure with a dsDNA sequence in stem of the hairpin which is more stable than the Watson-Crick A-T pair36. When SG I is added, it embeds grooves of double helix structure which resulted in a strong fluorescence with emission at 530 nm. The intensity of fluorescence and the quantity of the dsDNA presents a positive correlation. And therefore, according to the recorded FI, it was able to speculate the concentration of Hg2+ in environmental drinking water samples (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of label-free fluorescence method for detection of Hg2+.

Optimization of experimental conditions

In order to improve the detection performance, experimental conditions were optimized. As shown in Fig. 2, the area of optimum excitation wavelength and the scattered signal was recorded by 3D scanning. Confirmation of optimal excitation wavelength was based on the 3D fluorescent scanning images and the current report31. Thus, all the measurements were carried out with excitation at 490 nm and emission at 535 nm. The efficiency of the detection system would be enhanced greatly.
Figure 2

The 3D fluorescent scanning images of SG I.

(a) The 3D fluorescent contour spectrogram. (b) The 3D fluorescent spectrogram.

Figure S3 presented that the obtained FIs were progressively decreasing with time scanning. The reactants were mixed evenly and determined by F-4500 immediately within 1 min. Figure S4 displayed the effects of different intercalated amounts of SG I. When the addition of SG I was 2 μL (100×), it demonstrated the highest fluorescence enhancement. It is suggested that, in the optimized amount of SG I embedded in dsDNA, it was appropriately at the saturation point under this condition. The occurrence of fluorescence quenching was caused by accumulation of excessive 2 μL SG I probably owing to the steric hindrance of the reactions. However, the mechanism needs further research. In addition, the pH value of the buffer solution was 7.6 which is closed to the pH value of human body fluid. And the competitive coordination of OH− with Hg2+ limits the formation of T-Hg2+-T structure in an alkaline solution36.

Sensitivity of the novel one-step assay for Hg2+ detection

To assess the sensitivity and dynamic range of the proposed detection, a various of concentrations of Hg2+ were determined based on the records of the fluorescence signal. Figure 3 displayed that the fluorescence response of the test system at different Hg2+ concentrations positively increased. The logistic regression equation was y = 0.5625–0.6577/(1 + (x/43.5960)1.9243) with a determination coefficient (R) of 0.9961 and the working range of 5–200 nM (Fig. 4); the linear equation assay was y = 7.3725x + 1.4825 (R = 0.9996) with the working range of 100–1000 nM in the inset graph of Fig. 4. Reasonably, the LDL of the developed approach for Hg2+ was 3 nM relied on 3σ which was lower than the standard of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in drinking water (10 nM). σ is described as the standard deviation of the blank signal (without Hg2+ addition). Furthermore, the whole detection can be achieved within 1 min which proved that the proposed method is highly sensitive and rapid to meet the demand for the detection of Hg2+ especially in the on-site test.
Figure 3

Fluorescence response of the test system at different Hg2+ concentrations.

Figure 4

The standard curves for the detection of Hg2+ by the novel one-step assay.

The logistic regression equation and the linear equation in the inset graph with different working ranges.

Specificity of the novel one-step assay for Hg2+ detection

Specificity of detection system for Hg2+ was verified in two conditions. The first was that all the other concentration of the interfering ions were the same as the concentration of Hg2+ in the samples. The obtained values of FI/FI0 were illustrated in the black column of Fig. 5 and the two groups were significantly different. To further evaluate the practical applicability of analytical method for Hg2+, the positive control experiments were also carried out by adding 300 nM Hg2+ to the other interfering metal ion with the concentration of 900 nM (Trice higher than that of the sole Hg2+ addition), respectively. As indicating in the red column of Fig. 5, the obtained FIs were very closed to that of the addition of 300 nM Hg2+ only. The system appeared to be specific for Hg2+ detection with no significant cross-reactivity by the other metal ions. Both of the two conditions likewise suggested that interferences from diverse interfering metal ions having little effects on the detection system of Hg2+. It is accessible to satisfy the selectivity requirements of the Hg2+ detection in water environment.
Figure 5

Selectivity of Hg2+ of the test system.

Positive control: Black column: FI/FI0 of 1 μM Hg2+; Red column: FI/FI0 of 300 nM Hg2+. Other: Black column: FI/FI0 of 1 μM interfering metal ion; Red column: FI/FI0 of 900 nM interfering metal ion mixed with 300 nM Hg2+.

Practical appraisal of the detection platform

The practical application of the developed method was evaluated by the determination of the recovery of spiked Hg2+ in drinking water and ambient water samples, and compare to the classical laboratory assay, i.e. AFS, which is also the national standard of China for detecting Hg2+ in drinking water (GB/T-5750.6-2006). The analytical results were illustrated in Table 1. We observed that the recovery values were 95.05–103.51% by the developed method and 96.39–106.94% by AFS compared with the real values with the relative standard deviations below 10% which indicating good recovery in the assay. The proposed method and AFS gave consistent results. It suggested that the potential interference from the different background composition of water samples employed by this method was negligible and there were no significant differences between the two methods. Moreover, with the rapidness, convenience and low-costing of the proposed detection platform, it is applicable to analyze Hg2+ in practical environmental drinking water samples.
Table 1

Recovery tests of Hg2+-spiked water samples by the proposed method and AFS ( ± s, n = 3, nM).

Water samplesspikedProposed methodRecovery (%) of the proposed methodAFSRecovery (%) of AFS
Drinking water 12523.76 ± 1.2795.0524.85 ± 0.3599.39
Drinking water 25048.04 ± 1.0996.0752.15 ± 0.65104.69
Drinking water 3100100.46 ± 2.44100.46107.20 ± 1.10106.94
Drinking water 4200198.22 ± 2.4599.11192.05 ± 0.8096.39
Lake water 12525.88 ± 2.14103.5125.50 ± 0.40101.66
Lake water 25049.45 ± 1.5798.9051.55 ± 0.80102.07
Lake water 310099.82 ± 3.3499.82104.25 ± 0.85104.48
Lake water 4200201.18 ± 1.94100.59215.80 ± 2.70106.81

Discussion and Conclusions

Compared with the previous works about Hg2+ detection based on DNA3738394041424344 (Table 2) and/or rhodamine derivatives4546, the proposed method is much simpler, the designed ssDNA probe doesn’t require fluorescent labelling and all the detection processes of Hg2+ can be accomplished at RT within 1 min in one step without additional incubation. As can be seen, the developed method avoids a time-consuming derivatization step, especially compared with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy40, chemiluminescence detection44 and fluorescent chemodosimeter based on the rhodamine spirolactam derivative4546, etc. Besides the above, under the optimized conditions, this novel method presents higher sensitivity than that of the rhodamine-based method (97 nM, 100 nM)4547.
Table 2

Comparison of LDL, calibrated range and detection time, etc. among other DNA based methods for determination of Hg2+.

Detection methodLDL (nM)Calibrated range (nM)Reaction and incubation timeOperationRef
Electrochemiluminescence0.20.5–1.0 × 10350 minlaborious[38]
Field effect transistor0.10.1–101–2 slaborious[39]
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy1.0 × 10−31.0 × 10−3–2.0 × 107>2 hrmoderate[40]
UV-vis spectrophotometric3.511.5–4.75 × 10310 minlaborious[42]
Capillary electrophoresis4–54–5.0 × 10240 minlaborious[43]
Chemiluminescence22–1.0 × 102>3 hrmoderate[44]
T-Hg2+-T mis-matched fluorescent method9.532–1.8 × 10330 minconvenient[41]
Proposed fluorescent method35–1.0 × 1031 minconvenientthis work
In summary, we have developed a one-step straightforward and reliable T-rich DNA based fluorescence strategy for detecting of Hg2+ in environmental drinking water samples by designing a specific ssDNA probe and thus formation of a T-Hg2+-T complex in the presence of Hg2+ by folding to a stable hairpin structure. The assay also relies on the extraordinary fluorescence turn-off mechanism of SG I. The proposed method is more viable, low-costing and simple for operation in field detection than the other methods, making it easy to be integrated and automatized in microfluidic chip and sensors in the future. Great potentials are applicable by the proposed assay in detection of heavy metals for emergency disposal, environmental monitoring, surveillance and supporting of ecological risk assessment and management.

Methods

Chemicals and Materials

ssDNA was designed by Mfold (http://unafold.rna.albany.edu/?q=mfold/DNA-Folding-Form). They were commercially synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China), and purified by high performance liquid chromatography. The sequences of the oligonucleotides were: 5′-CTTCTTTCTTCCCCTTGTTTGTTG-3′, hereinafter referred to “Hg-binding ssDNA”. SG I (10,000× concentrate dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide) was ordered from Invitrogen Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) and stored at −20 °C. The standard solutions of Hg2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Cr6+ and Cd2+ were purchased from AccuStandard, Inc. (New Haven, USA) with the concentration of 1 mg mL−1 respectively. All the other chemicals were of analytical-reagent grade. Ultra-purified water used in the experiments was prepared by Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA), which had a minimum resistivity of 18 MΩ·cm. All the experiments were performed at room temperature (RT).

Apparatus

Fluorescence intensities (FIs) values were all recorded and analyzed by F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with the following parameters: a response time of 2 s, a PMT voltage of 700 V, a scan speed of 1200 nm min−1, an excitation wavelength of 490 nm, all the excitation and the emission slits were 5 nm. The laboratory method for the detection of Hg2+ was employed by AFS (GB/T-5750.6-2006, China) (AFS-9800, bjhaiguang, Beijing, China).

Preparation of the Hg-binding ssDNA

The primitive commercialized lyophilized oligonucleotides powder in EP tube was centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 min and then dissolved with ultra-purified water to 100 μM. The stock solutions of Hg-binding ssDNA was prepared after gently vortex (600–800 rpm) and frozen at −20 °C. The desired concentration of the ssDNA was diluted with HEPES buffer solution (HEPES: 10 mM, NaNO3: 20 mM, pH: 7.6). The Hg-binding ssDNA was diluted to the concentration of 100 nM in microtubes, Hg2+ (1 μM) and SG I (2 μL, 100×) were added and gently vortexed for 3 min at RT. 3D scanning was operated in excitation and emission ranging from the wavelength of 200 to 750 nm. The 3D fluorescent spectrograms were obtained by Hitachi FL Solutions software. And then, various amounts of 2 μL SG I (400×, 200×, 100×, 40× and 20×) were prepared and were respectively added into the above mixed solution. Afterwards, with the same procedure, optimal amount of SG I was obtained in wavelength ranging from 510 to 600 nm with excitation at 490 nm. Then the addition amount of SG I is unchanged and time scanning were performed by fluorescence spectrophotometer.

Assay for the determination of Hg2+

Under the optimal amount of SG I, the concentration gradients of the Hg2+ were added into the probe solutions of Hg-binding ssDNA and then the above prepared solutions were mixed subsequently at RT for 1 min. Fluorescence spectra were measured in wavelength ranging from 510 to 600 nm with the excitation wavelength at 490 nm. The FI at wavelength of 535 nm was recorded for quantitative assay of Hg2+. The process could be achieved in one step. All the measurements were repeated in triplicate.

Specificity test

To verify the specificity of the system for determining Hg2+, we analyzed the potential interfered ions in real water sample, such as Hg2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Cr6+ and Cd2+, etc. All the water samples were tested without the existence of Hg2+ before. Furthermore, the concentration of each metal ion in the experimental group and the concentration of Hg2+ as positive control was 1 μM. The other experimental group was carried out by adding 300 nM Hg2+ to the interfering metal ion with the concentration of 900 nM, and the positive control was 300 nM Hg2+ only.

Preparation of practical water sample

To evaluate the practical application of the assay, drinking water samples including tap water from Tianjin (117°12′7″E, 39°06′41″N) and lake water from Hangzhou (119°0′35″E, 29°35′54″N) were employed for Hg2+ detection. To get rid of the potential inference of chlorine that might exist, the water samples were heated 5 min at 85 °C and let it stand for about 2 d, then stored at 4 °C for further use. All the water samples were filtered through 0.45 μm microfiltrators and detected by AFS. We found Hg2+ hasn’t been detected. After that, AFS was carried out for Hg2+ detection. After AFS detection, Hg2+ in the initial water samples hasn’t been detected yet. Therefore the extra addition of Hg2+ was spiked in these samples to verify there is no matrix effects as the interference factor for Hg2+ by our proposed method. The aforementioned water samples were used as a sample matrix to evaluate the recovery in the assay. Hg2+ was spiked into aforementioned water samples, and analyzed by the proposed method and AFS separately.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Li, Y. et al. A novel label-free fluorescence assay for one-step sensitive detection of Hg2+ in environmental drinking water samples. Sci. Rep. 7, 45974; doi: 10.1038/srep45974 (2017). Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  34 in total

1.  Monolithic capillary electrophoresis device with integrated fluorescence detector.

Authors:  J R Webster; M A Burns; D T Burke; C H Mastrangelo
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Demonstration of preferential binding of SYBR Green I to specific DNA fragments in real-time multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Steven Giglio; Paul T Monis; Christopher P Saint
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Mechanisms underlying the impact of humic acids on DNA quantification by SYBR Green I and consequences for the analysis of soils and aquatic sediments.

Authors:  Hubert Zipper; Christiane Buta; Katrin Lämmle; Herwig Brunner; Jürgen Bernhagen; Frank Vitzthum
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Mercury concentrations and metabolism in infants receiving vaccines containing thiomersal: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Michael E Pichichero; Elsa Cernichiari; Joseph Lopreiato; John Treanor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Label-free fluorescence strategy for sensitive detection of exonuclease activity using SYBR Green I as probe.

Authors:  Min Xu; Baoxin Li
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Three-dimensional paper-based electrochemiluminescence device for simultaneous detection of Pb2+ and Hg2+ based on potential-control technique.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Lei Ge; Shenguang Ge; Mei Yan; Jinghua Yu; Jiadong Huang; Su Liu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  Intelligent and ultrasensitive analysis of mercury trace contaminants via plasmonic metamaterial-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Cuong Cao; Jun Zhang; Shuzhou Li; Qihua Xiong
Journal:  Small       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 8.  Mercury levels along the food chain and risk for exposed populations.

Authors:  A Renzoni; F Zino; E Franchi
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Urinary mercury concentrations associated with dental restorations in adult women aged 16-49 years: United States, 1999-2000.

Authors:  B A Dye; S E Schober; C F Dillon; R L Jones; C Fryar; M McDowell; T H Sinks
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  An improved SYBR Green-1-based fluorescence method for the routine monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to anti-malarial drugs.

Authors:  Victor Dery; Nancy O Duah; Ruth Ayanful-Torgby; Sena A Matrevi; Francis Anto; Neils B Quashie
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fluorometric determination of lead(II) and mercury(II) based on their interaction with a complex formed between graphene oxide and a DNAzyme.

Authors:  Ayyanu Ravikumar; Perumal Panneerselvam; Kothalam Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  A Multifunctional Molecular Probe for Detecting Hg2+ and Ag⁺ Based on Ion-Mediated Base Mismatch.

Authors:  Luhui Wang; Yingying Zhang; Yafei Dong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Organomercury Nucleic Acids: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Dattatraya Ukale; Tuomas Lönnberg
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.164

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.