| Literature DB >> 28378396 |
Jin-Yu Mei1,2, Ming-Jun Zhang3, Yuan-Yuan Wang4, Ye-Hai Liu1.
Abstract
The incidences of thyroid cancer keep rising worldwide over the past few decades. Although most thyroid cancers are indolent and highly curable, the treatment for advanced thyroid cancer remains challengeable in clinical practice. We performed two separate cohorts to evaluate the safety and efficiency of Escin in patients with advanced thyroid cancer . In cohort 1, 120 patients were divided into four groups equally and were administrated with placebo or different dosages of Escin. The pharmacokinetics of Escin and the side effects were evaluated. In cohort 2, 120 patients were treated with Escin. Several biomarkers related to the progression of thyroid cancer were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses were performed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The serum Escin concentrations were stable during the treatment. Escin (0.6 mg/kg/day for 9 days, intravenous injection) was tolerable for patients with thyroid cancer . Escin significantly reduced the serum levels of TSH, TgAb, Tg, and calcitonin and prolonged the PFS and OS for patients with advanced thyroid cancer. This study showed Escin is efficient and well tolerated in patients with advanced thyroid cancer. Future studies are needed to investigate the mechanism of Escin on thyroid cancer and the proper dosage of Escin clinically.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced thyroid cancer; Escin; pharmacokinetics; side effects
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28378396 PMCID: PMC5430090 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Patient characteristics
| Variable | First study of patient ( | Second study of patient ( | Control ( | Significant difference (1st vs 2nd study; Yes/No) | Significant difference (1st/2nd study vs control; Yes/No) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age: year | 69.6 ± 4.3 | 64.8 ± 4.9 | 68.2 ± 2.3 | No | No |
| Sex: no. (%) | |||||
| Male | 72 (60) | 66 (55) | 50 (50) | No | No |
| Female | 48 (40) | 54 (45) | 50 (50) | No | No |
| Hyperlipidemia ( | 108 (90) | 102 (85) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Coronary artery disease ( | 96 (80) | 108 (90) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Diabetes mellitus ( | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Atrial fibrillation ( | 108 (90) | 114 (95) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Palpitation ( | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Face flushing ( | 108 (90) | 114 (100) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Diarrhea ( | 114 (95) | 120 (100) | 3 (3) | No | Yes |
| Hoarseness ( | 120 (100) | 114 (95) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Bucking ( | 102 (85) | 102 (85) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Dyspnea ( | 108 (90) | 102 (85) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Dysphagia ( | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Lymphadenectasis ( | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
| Corestenoma ( | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 0 (0) | No | Yes |
Student's t‐test was used to compare the results.
Figure 1Escin had stable blood concentration during cohort 1. Mean Escin plasma concentration vs. time profiles from patients dosed with Escin 0.2 mg/kg/day (n = 30), Escin 0.4 mg/kg/day (n = 30), and 0.6 mg/kg/day (n = 30). Each value represents the mean ± SD.
All adverse a dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) during first study
| 30 patients with 0.2 mg/kg Escin. No. (%) | 30 patients with 0.4 mg/kg Escin. No. (%) | 30 patients with 0.6 mg/kg Escin. No. (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperbilirubinemia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| AST elevation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Anemia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3) |
| Thrombocytopenia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Fatigue | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Neutropenia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Rash | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Diarrhea | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Fever | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Bleeding | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Mucositis | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Hypocalcemia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| ALT elevation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3) |
| Hyponatremia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Hypophosphatemia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Sudden death | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Unless otherwise noted, all data presented as n (%).
All significant adverse events for thyroid cancer during second study (P < 0.5)
| Variable | Second study of patient | Second study of patient with treatment | Control | Significant difference between second study and control ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSH (IU/L) | 1.1 ± 0.34 | 1.87 ± 0.64 | 2.34 ± 0.76 |
|
| Total T3 (ng/mL) | 5.81 ± 1.23 | 3.21 ± 0.77 | 1.27 ± 0.25 |
|
| Total T4 ( | 22.68 ± 3.24 | 2.64 ± 1.08 | 10.1 ± 2.09 |
|
| Free T3 (pg/mL) | 5.6 ± 1.41 | 4.35 ± 1.07 | 3.21 ± 1.35 |
|
| Free T4 (ng/dL) | 2.61 ± 0.13 | 1.60 ± 0.11 | 1.34 ± 0.22 |
|
| TG (ng/mL) | 55.98 ± 7.41 | 25.78 ± 2.14 | 10.29 ± 2.66 |
|
| TGA(IU/mL) | 54.9 ± 8.14 | 44.77 ± 4.28 | 22.57 ± 4.92 |
|
| TBG( | 78.19 ± 7.23 | 54.1 ± 6.87 | 35.44 ± 4.17 |
|
| Calcitonin (ng/L) | 198.32 ± 35.98 | 124.32 ± 28.32 | 89.67 ± 11.44 |
|
Unless otherwise noted, all data presented as n (%).
IQR, interquartile range; TSH, thyroid‐stimulating hormone; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine.
Response rates using the response evaluation criteria in patients in second study
| Response | Number of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Complete response | 0 (0) |
| Partial response | 12 (10) |
| Stable disease | 90 (75) |
| Progression disease | 18 (15) |
| Disease control rate (DCR) | 102 (85) |
Unless otherwise noted, all data presented as n (%).The disease control rate was defined as the proportion of patients who had a best response rating of a complete response, partial response, or stable disease that was maintained for ≥4 weeks from the first manifestation of the rating.
Figure 2Escin inhibited the recurrence of cancer and prolonged the survival time of patients. (A) The recurrence time was recorded of 120 patients of second study compared 30 patients of first study without Escin treatment as control from surgery and radiation therapy (P < 0.01). (B) The survival time was recorded of 120 patients of second study compared 30 patients of first study without Escin treatment as control from surgery and radiation therapy (P < 0.01).