| Literature DB >> 28377524 |
Ehud Inbar1, V Keith Hughitt2,3, Laura A L Dillon2, Kashinath Ghosh1, Najib M El-Sayed2,3, David L Sacks4.
Abstract
The life cycle of the Leishmania parasite in the sand fly vector involves differentiation into several distinctive forms, each thought to represent an adaptation to specific microenvironments in the midgut of the fly. Based on transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) results, we describe the first high-resolution analysis of the transcriptome dynamics of four distinct stages of Leishmania major as they develop in a natural vector, Phlebotomus duboscqi The early transformation from tissue amastigotes to procyclic promastigotes in the blood-fed midgut was accompanied by the greatest number of differentially expressed genes, including the downregulation of amastins, and upregulation of multiple cell surface proteins, sugar and amino acid transporters, and genes related to glucose metabolism and cell cycle progression. The global changes accompanying post-blood meal differentiation of procyclic promastigotes to the nectomonad and metacyclic stages were less extensive, though each displayed a unique signature. The transcriptome of nectomonads, which has not been studied previously, revealed changes consistent with cell cycle arrest and the upregulation of genes associated with starvation and stress, including autophagic pathways of protein recycling. Maturation to the infective, metacyclic stage was accompanied by changes suggesting preadaptation to the intracellular environment of the mammalian host, demonstrated by the amastigote-like profiles of surface proteins and metabolism-related genes. Finally, a direct comparison between sand fly-derived and culture-derived metacyclics revealed a reassuring similarity between the two forms, with the in vivo forms distinguished mainly by a stronger upregulation of transcripts associated with nutrient stress.IMPORTANCE The life cycle of Leishmania parasites in the sand fly vector includes their growth and development as morphologically distinct forms of extracellular promastigotes found within the different microenvironments of the gut. Based on RNA-Seq, we provide here the first high-resolution, transcriptomic analysis of Leishmania insect stages during their cyclical development in vivo, from tissue amastigotes ingested with the blood meal to infective, metacyclic promastigotes that initiate infection in the mammalian host. The most extensive genetic reprogramming occurred during the early transformation of amastigotes to rapidly dividing procyclic promastigotes in the blood-fed midgut, with major changes in the abundance of mRNAs for surface proteins and metabolism. The post-blood meal-adapted nectomonad stage was characterized by the downregulation of cell cycle-related genes and the upregulation of stress- and starvation-related genes. Finally, the transcriptome of metacyclic promastigotes shifted to a more amastigote-like profile, suggesting their preadaptation to the intracellular host environment.Entities:
Keywords: Leishmania; sand fly; transcriptome
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28377524 PMCID: PMC5380837 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00029-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Morphological observations of the different L. major developmental stages. Light microscope images are of promastigotes recovered from sand flies on days 2 (PP), 4 (NP), and 15 (MP) postinfection and stained with Hoechst fluorescent dye. Culture-derived metacyclics (CMP) were purified from stationary-phase cultures of promastigotes growing in CM199.
FIG 2 Global transcriptomic profiles of L. major parasites in the different developmental stages. RNA-Seq was performed on replicate samples of sand fly-derived procyclic (PP), nectomonad (NP), and metacyclic promastigotes (MP), purified culture-derived metacyclics (CMP), and footpad lesion-derived amastigotes (AM). (A) PCA results. The different colors indicate the different developmental stages in biological replicates A (triangles) and B (circles). (B) Heat map of hierarchical clustering analysis using the Pearson correlation, with correlation levels indicated by colors (inset). (C) Distribution of DEG between different sequential developmental stages in vivo are indicated in a bar graph. The box width depicts the number of DEG downregulated (purple) and upregulated (blue) at an adjusted P value of 0.05, with the total number of down- and upregulated genes shown. The color shading indicates the proportion of genes with at least 4-fold (dark), between 2- and 4-fold (medium), or 2-fold differential expression (light). (D) Venn diagram showing the differentially and commonly expressed mRNAs between AM and each of the sand fly promastigote stages.
FIG 3 Selected coexpression modules showing dynamics of cellular processes across L. major developmental stages in the sand fly. Each line represents a plot of the median expression level of a selected gene or group of genes in coexpression modules relating to cell surface (A), metabolism (B), cell cycle and gene expression (C), and differentiation, stress, and autophagy (D). Values shown are the log2 counts per million and represent the proportion of reads mapped to each Leishmania gene, multiplied by 106.
The top 10 up- or downregulated mRNAs between culture MP and log-phase promastigotes compared to the difference between sand fly MP and PP
| Direction of regulation and gene ID | Product description | Fold change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Culture MP vs log-phase promastigotes (Dillon et al.) | Sand fly MP vs PP (this work) | ||
| Upregulated in culture metacyclics | |||
| LmjF.34.0070 | Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) | 3.61 | NS |
| LmjF.17.0890 | META domain-containing protein (META1) | 3.07 | NS |
| LmjF.02.0460 | Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel putative | 3.03 | NS |
| LmjF.23.0730 | RNA-binding protein putative | 2.78 | 4.22 |
| LmjF.12.0480 | Hypothetical protein unknown function | 2.73 | 6.88 |
| LmjF.16.0500 | Hypothetical protein unknown function | 2.71 | NS |
| LmjF.28.0980 | P27 protein putative | 2.69 | NS |
| LmjF.23.0780 | Hypothetical protein conserved | 2.68 | 8.46 |
| LmjF.22.0250 | Phosphoinositide phosphatase | 2.63 | 5.92 |
| LmjF.29.1350 | RNA-binding protein putative | 2.59 | NS |
| Downregulated in culture metacyclics | |||
| LmjF.31.3070 | Iron-zinc transporter protein-like protein (LIT1) | −3.13 | NS |
| LmjF.33.1760 | Hypothetical protein unknown function | −2.91 | NS |
| LmjF.35.1310 | Histone H4 | −2.89 | NS |
| LmjF.35.2130 | Hypothetical protein unknown function | −2.82 | NS |
| LmjF.36.0020 | Histone H4 | −2.72 | −2.08 |
| LmjF.35.2160 | Adenine aminohydrolase (AAH) | −2.72 | 7.04 |
| LmjF.14.0470 | Hypothetical protein conserved | −2.69 | NS |
| LmjF.31.3180 | Histone H4 | −2.66 | −2 |
| LmjF.33.3240 | h1 histone-like protein | −2.58 | NS |
| LmjF.21.0740 | ATPase subunit 9 putative | −2.58 | −2.08 |
NS, not significant; differences between growth stages were not statistically significant.
The top 10 up- and downregulated mRNAs between sand fly MP and PP compared to the change between MP and log-phase promastigotes from culture
| Direction of regulation and gene ID | Product description | Fold change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Culture MP vs log-phase promastigotes (Dillon et al.) | Sand fly MP vs PP (this work) | ||
| Upregulated in MP | |||
| LmjF.23.1084 | Hypothetical protein | 1.98 | 32.93 |
| LmjF.23.1086 | Small hydrophilic endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein (SHERP2) | 1.90 | 31.55 |
| LmjF.23.1075 | Hypothetical protein | 1.93 | 29.00 |
| LmjF.23.1050 | Small hydrophilic endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein (SHERP) | 1.88 | 28.80 |
| LmjF.23.1080 | Small hydrophilic endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein (SHERP1) | 1.88 | 25.64 |
| LmjF.33.1290 | Hypothetical protein conserved | 1.72 | 24.29 |
| LmjF.31.0350 | Amino acid transporter aATP11 putative (AAT1.4) | 1.29 | 24.12 |
| LmjF.13.0190 | Hypothetical protein unknown function | 1.68 | 19.81 |
| LmjF.26.0160 | Nuclear | 2.18 | 10.42 |
| LmjF.11.1290 | ATP-binding cassette protein subfamily A member 6 putative | −1.34 | 10.30 |
| Downregulated in MP | |||
| LmjF.12.1040 | Surface antigen protein putative | 1.36 | −16.60 |
| LmjF.12.1060 | Surface antigen protein putative | 1.31 | −14.20 |
| LmjF.12.1020 | Surface antigen protein putative | 1.36 | −11.77 |
| LmjF.12.0910 | Promastigote surface antigen protein | 1.32 | −10.79 |
| LmjF.12.0860 | Surface antigen protein putative | 1.35 | −9.75 |
| LmjF.12.0920 | Promastigote surface antigen protein | 1.35 | −9.15 |
| LmjF.14.0130 | Inosine-guanine nucleoside hydrolase putative | 1.31 | −7.74 |
| LmjF.15.1090 | Developmentally regulated protein putative | 1.09 | −7.25 |
| LmjF.06.0210 | Hypothetical protein conserved | −1.51 | −5.94 |
| LmjF.13.0870 | Mitochondrial processing peptidase alpha-subunit putative | −1.24 | −5.86 |