Literature DB >> 28377189

Outcomes of hemodynamic support with Impella in very high-risk patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Results from the Global cVAD Registry.

Vikas Singh1, Pradeep K Yadav2, Marvin H Eng3, Francisco Yuri Macedo4, Guilherme V Silva5, Rodrigo Mendirichaga6, Amit P Badiye6, Rahul Sakhuja7, Sammy Elmariah7, Ignacio Inglessis7, Carlos E Alfonso6, Theodore L Schreiber8, Mauricio Cohen6, Igor Palacios7, William W O'Neill3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports on the role of hemodynamic support devices in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) are limited.
METHODS: Patients were identified from the cVAD registry, an ongoing multicenter voluntary registry at selected sites in North America that have used Impella in >10 patients.
RESULTS: A total of 116 patients with AS who underwent BAV with Impella support were identified. Mean age was 80.41±9.03years and most patients were male. Mean STS score was 18.77%±18.32, LVEF was 27.14%±16.07, and 42% underwent concomitant PCI. In most cases Impella was placed electively prior to BAV, whereas 26.7% were placed as an emergency. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics except for higher prevalence of CAD and lower LVEF in the elective group, and higher STS score in the emergency group. Elective strategy was associated higher 1-year survival compared to emergency placement (56% vs. 29.2%, p=0.003). One-year survival was higher when BAV was used as a bridge to definitive therapy as opposed to palliative treatment (90% vs. 28%, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, STS score and aim of BAV (bridge to definitive therapy vs. palliative indication) were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with AS and severe LV dysfunction undergoing BAV, our results demonstrates feasibility and promising long-term outcomes using elective Impella support with the intention to bridge to a definitive therapy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Balloon aortic valvuloplasty; Impella; Left ventricular dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28377189     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Ahmed Al Mustafa; Zakeih Chaker; Fahad Alqahtani; Sami Aljohani; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 2.  The Role of Impella for Hemodynamic Support in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Vikas Singh; Rodrigo Mendirichaga; Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje; Igor F Palacios; William W O'Neill
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-23

3.  The Long Road to the Left Main: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Revascularization of Complex Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Scott Donald; Hilary Bews; Chantal Asselin; Basem Elbarouni; David Allen; Malek Kass; Siuchan Sookhoo; Davinder S Jassal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-06

4.  Intensive care unit management of percutaneous mechanical circulatory supported patients: the role of imaging.

Authors:  Andrea Montisci; Letizia F Bertoldi; Susanna Price; Christian Hassager; Jacob Møller; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.803

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.