| Literature DB >> 28376800 |
Yosuke Nakadate1, Hiroaki Sato2, Takeshi Oguchi3, Tamaki Sato2, Akiko Kawakami4, Tadahiko Ishiyama4, Takashi Matsukawa3, Thomas Schricker2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While acute hyperglycemia has been shown to mitigate the beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning, its effect on insulin-induced preconditioning remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Acute hyperglycemia; Cardiac contractility; Insulin-induced cardioprotection; Isolated rat heart; Phospho-protein kinase B; Stunned myocardium; Tumor necrosis factor-α
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28376800 PMCID: PMC5379698 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-017-0527-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1Experimental protocol. The InsG100 group received 0.5 U/L insulin, 100 mg/dL glucose and 27.5 mmol/L of mannitol in KH buffer. The InsG600 group received 0.5 U/L insulin and 600 mg/dL glucose in KH buffer. The G600 group was perfused with KH buffer containing 600 mg/dL
Baseline measurements
| G100 | InsG100 | G600 | InsG600 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (n) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Dry heart weight (g) | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.03 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 232 ± 27 | 251 ± 29 | 250 ± 30 | 242 ± 23 |
| dP/dt max (mmHg/s) | 1940 ± 201 | 1920 ± 246 | 1720 ± 266 | 1710 ± 256 |
| Coronary flow (mL/min) | 12.4 ± 1.6 | 11.9 ± 1.3 | 12.1 ± 2.8 | 11.5 ± 3.1 |
Data are the mean ± SD
There are no significant differences among the groups
Baseline measurements are presented in absolute values as obtained 5 min after stabilization, except for dry heart weight, which was measured at the end of the experiment
LV dP/dt max maximum of left ventricular derivative of pressure development
Fig. 2Changes in heart rate over time, before and after ischemia, in the four groups (n = 10). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. HR heart rate (bpm). *P < 0.05 vs. G100. † P < 0.05 vs. InsG600. ‡ P < 0.05 vs. G600
Fig. 3Changes in coronary flow over time, before and after ischemia, in the four groups (n = 10). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. G100. † P < 0.05 vs. InsG600. ‡ P < 0.05 vs. G600
Fig. 4Changes in LV dP/dt max over time, before and after ischemia, in the four groups (n = 10). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. G100. † P < 0.05 vs. InsG600. ‡ P < 0.05 vs. G600. LV dP/dt max (mmHg/s) maximum of left ventricular derivative of pressure development
Fig. 5Changes in rate pressure product over time, before and after ischemia, in the four groups (n = 10). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. * P < 0.05 vs. G100. † P < 0.05 vs. InsG600. ‡ P < 0.05 vs. G600
Myocardial TNF-α and p-Akt contents at the end of reperfusion
| G100 | InsG100 | G600 | InsG600 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (n) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Myocardial TNF-α contents (pg/g dry heart weight) | 1568 ± 458 | 2073 ± 424 | 1925 ± 229 | 1787 ± 464 |
| Myocardial p-Akt/total Akt (Unit/mg) | 11.4 ± 11.9 | 77.9 ± 19.6*,†,‡ | 15.9 ± 10.9 | 53.6 ± 20.7*,‡ |
Data are the mean ± SD
There was no difference among the groups in the cardiac muscle TNF-α concentration 20 min after reperfusion. The myocardial p-Akt/total-Akt in the InsG100 group was significantly higher than the other two groups and that in the InsG600 group was significantly higher we than those in the InsG100 and InsG600 at 20 min after reperfusion
* P < 0.05 vs. G100
† P < 0.05 vs. InsG600
‡ P < 0.05 vs. G600