| Literature DB >> 28376738 |
Xianyan Tang1,2, Alan Geater3, Edward McNeil3, Qiuyun Deng4, Aihu Dong4, Ge Zhong5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of measles re-emerged in Guangxi province during 2013-2014, where measles again became a major public health concern. A better understanding of the patterns of measles cases would help in identifying high-risk areas and periods for optimizing preventive strategies, yet these patterns remain largely unknown. Thus, this study aimed to determine the patterns of measles clusters in space, time and space-time at the county level over the period 2004-2014 in Guangxi.Entities:
Keywords: Irregular cluster; Measles; Scan statistics; Spatial; Spatio-temporal; Temporal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28376738 PMCID: PMC5379653 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2357-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Annual trend in measles incidence during 2004–2014 and epidemic curve of monthly measles cases in Guangxi, between January 2004 and December 2014. a is for trend line, and b is for epidemic curve
Fig. 2Spatial interpolation of measles incidence between 2004 and 2014, Guangxi, China
Spatial irregular clusters of annual measles incidence between 2004 and 2014
| Year | Type of cluster | No. of counties in cluster | Radius (km) | LLR | RR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Most likely cluster | 2 | 39.17 | 114.21 | 7.12 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 8 | 164.99 | 104.56 | 2.76 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 6 | 187.76 | 38.18 | 2.06 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 3 | 4 | 113.48 | 26.68 | 1.75 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 4 | 3 | 81.03 | 24.37 | 2.66 | 0.001 | |
| 2005 | Most likely cluster | 4 | 26.18 | 381.42 | 7.24 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 4 | 117.62 | 355.75 | 6.41 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 1 | 0.00a | 85.96 | 5.30 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 3 | 2 | 61.69 | 35.73 | 2.38 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 4 | 2 | 64.71 | 28.58 | 2.88 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 5 | 2 | 53.88 | 9.99 | 2.56 | 0.033 | |
| 2006 | Most likely cluster | 6 | 100.54 | 191.49 | 7.03 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 6 | 132.81 | 137.54 | 3.99 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 2 | 12.85 | 91.45 | 8.48 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 3 | 5 | 179.29 | 11.43 | 1.93 | 0.005 | |
| 2007 | Most likely cluster | 1 | 0.00a | 1107.94 | 33.01 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 3 | 87.64 | 25.58 | 2.91 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 2 | 32.53 | 23.32 | 2.60 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 3 | 1 | 0.00a | 22.49 | 2.64 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 4 | 4 | 14.26 | 9.88 | 2.27 | 0.046 | |
| 2008 | Most likely cluster | 4 | 59.44 | 207.67 | 5.14 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 4 | 14.26 | 96.97 | 5.97 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 1 | 0.00a | 87.52 | 4.93 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 3 | 4 | 153.81 | 19.88 | 2.52 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 4 | 1 | 0.00a | 12.49 | 2.56 | 0.002 | |
| Secondary cluster 5 | 1 | 0.00a | 10.57 | 4.64 | 0.018 | |
| Secondary cluster 6 | 1 | 0.00a | 9.62 | 4.93 | 0.050 | |
| 2009 | Most likely cluster | 1 | 0.00a | 66.28 | 33.23 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 5 | 136.07 | 20.64 | 4.62 | 0.001 | |
| 2010 | Most likely cluster | 1 | 0.00a | 15.51 | 53.67 | 0.002 |
| 2011 | Most likely cluster | 6 | 92.81 | 28.95 | 18.03 | 0.001 |
| 2012 | Most likely cluster | 1 | 0.00a | 42.68 | 56.51 | 0.001 |
| 2013 | Most likely cluster | 1 | 0.00a | 1924.26 | 81.45 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 8 | 205.23 | 163.35 | 4.14 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 2 | 49.60 | 18.22 | 2.48 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 3 | 1 | 0.00a | 13.63 | 2.07 | 0.001 | |
| 2014 | Most likely cluster | 8 | 127.25 | 2006.30 | 5.88 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 3 | 71.96 | 431.92 | 7.04 | 0.001 | |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 5 | 153.81 | 24.99 | 1.88 | 0.001 |
*Tango’s flexible scan statistics
aZero-radius means only one county in the cluster
Fig. 3Spatial irregular clusters of measles incidence between 2004 and 2014, Guangxi, China
Spatio-temporal irregular clusters of annual measles incidence during 2004–2014
| Type of cluster | Cluster period | Cluster center | No. of counties | LLR | RR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most likely cluster | 2014 | 108.08 E, 22.92 N | 5 | 1042.05 | 6.22 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 1 | 2013–2014 | 106.51 E, 24.83 N | 10 | 764.37 | 4.24 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 2 | 2004–2005 | 109.76 E, 24.02 N | 23 | 637.35 | 4.26 | 0.001 |
| Secondary cluster 3 | 2007 | 108.11 E, 24.17 N | 1 | 552.47 | 9.86 | 0.001 |
*Kulldorff’s space-time scan statistics based on Poisson model and elliptical-cylinder scanning window
Fig. 4Spatio-temporal irregular clusters of measles incidence in Guangxi, between 2004 and 2014. a and b are the visualizations in two-dimension and three-dimension, respectively
Fig. 5Linear directional mean (LDM) during 2004–2014
Fig. 6Spatial patterns of relative risk (RR) and population attributable risk percent (PAR%) among children aged ≤24 months in Guangxi, 2004–2014. a is for RR, and b is for PAR%