Literature DB >> 28376553

Fungal Keratitis: A Six-Year Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre.

K C Iselin1, P B Baenninger1, A Schmittinger-Zirm1, M A Thiel1, C Kaufmann1.   

Abstract

Background This review reports the epidemiology, laboratory results, treatment regimens and costs of fungal keratitis at a tertiary referral center in Lucerne, Switzerland. Patients and Methods Culture-proven fungal infections between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Results Seventeen patients with a mean age of 52 years were identified. Contact lens wear was the most important risk factor (n = 11) (65 % of all cases), with filamentous fungi being identified as the most common fungus type (n = 10) (91 % of all cases of contact lens-associated fungal keratitis). All non-contact lens-associated fungal infections (n = 6) (35 % of all cases) were related to Candida spp. Six patients (35 %) were treated on an outpatient basis; 11 cases (65 %) required hospitalisation. Systemic voriconazole was the treatment regimen prescribed most often (n = 12) (71 %), followed by topical natamycin 5 % (n = 11) (65 %). Corneal crosslinking and penetrating keratoplasty were required in 4 cases each (24 %). One case ended up in enucleation (6 %). Average costs per case were EUR 15 952 for hospitalised patients if surgical intervention was required, and EUR 7415 if no intervention was performed. Average costs for outpatients were EUR 7079. In a majority of cases, visual acuity could be improved (n = 9) (53 %) or preserved (n = 2) (12 %). Conclusion Despite the relatively low incidence of culture-proven keratitis (17 cases in 6 years), a clear pattern with regard to risk factors and fungus species was noted. In the absence of a gold standard for the treatment of fungal keratitis, the combination of systemic voriconazole and topical natamycin seems to be one of the most commonly used antifungal treatment regimens. The costs of outpatient versus inpatient non-surgical treatment were approximately the same. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28376553     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-123233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  4 in total

1.  [The German keratomycosis registry : Initial results of a multicenter survey].

Authors:  M Roth; L Daas; A Renner-Wilde; N Cvetkova-Fischer; M Saeger; M Herwig-Carl; M Matthaei; A Fekete; V Kakkassery; G Walther; M von Lilienfeld-Toal; C Mertens; J Lenk; J Mehlan; C Fischer; M Fuest; S Kroll; W Bayoudh; A Viestenz; A Frings; C R MacKenzie; E M Messmer; B Seitz; O Kurzai; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  A 10-Year Retrospective Clinical Analysis of Fungal Keratitis in a Portuguese Tertiary Centre.

Authors:  Ana Maria Cunha; João Tiago Loja; Luís Torrão; Raúl Moreira; Dolores Pinheiro; Fernando Falcão-Reis; João Pinheiro-Costa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-12

3.  The epidemiological aspects of fungal keratitis in a population sample from Northern Iran: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mitra Akbari; Mohadese Sedighi; Reza Soltani Moghadam; Ehsan Kazemnejad
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Microbiological Profiles of Ocular Fungal Infection at an Ophthalmic Referral Hospital in Southern China: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yinhui Pei; Xiaoling Chen; Yiwei Tan; Xiuping Liu; Fang Duan; Kaili Wu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.177

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.