Literature DB >> 28376434

Research Reporting Guidelines and the New Annals Instructions for Authors.

Aaron M Orkin, William R Phillips, Kurt C Stange.   

Abstract

Keywords:  epidemiologic research design; guidelines; primary care research; publishing standards; quality control; reporting guidelines; scientific writing

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 28376434      PMCID： PMC5389391          DOI： 10.1370/afm.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN： 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rolf H H Groenwold; Anna M M Van Deursen; Arno W Hoes; Eelko Hak
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change.

Authors:  Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Debra L Scammon; Norman J Waitzman; Peter F Cronholm; Jacqueline R Halladay; David L Driscoll; Leif I Solberg; Clarissa Hsu; Ming Tai-Seale; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Sarah C Shih; Michael D Fetters; Christopher G Wise; Jeffrey A Alexander; Diane Hauser; Carmit K McMullen; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Manasi A Tirodkar; Laura Schmidt; Katrina E Donahue; Michael L Parchman; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Elizabeth Murphy; Jon Nicholl
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2008-04

5.  Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices.

Authors:  Carol Bennett; Sara Khangura; Jamie C Brehaut; Ian D Graham; David Moher; Beth K Potter; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial.

Authors:  E Cobo; J Cortés; J M Ribera; F Cardellach; A Selva-O'Callaghan; B Kostov; L García; L Cirugeda; D G Altman; J A González; J A Sànchez; F Miras; A Urrutia; V Fonollosa; C Rey-Joly; M Vilardell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-22

Review 7.  Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study.

Authors:  Simon Lewin; Claire Glenton; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-10

8.  Transparency in reporting observational studies: reflections after a year.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 11.069
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reflections From a Statistical Editor: Elements of Great Manuscripts.

Authors:  Miguel Marino
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  A String of Pearls: Lessons for Medical Writing and Submitting for Publication.

Authors:  Christy J W Ledford
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2020-01-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.