Literature DB >> 28376040

SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY FEATURES IN DIFFERENT STAGES OF BEST VITELLIFORM MACULAR DYSTROPHY.

Maurizio Battaglia Parodi1, Pierluigi Iacono2, Francesco Romano1, Francesco Bandello1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a systematic classification of findings regarding the different stages of vitelliform macular dystrophy on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
METHODS: Ninety-four eyes of 47 patients were recruited in a prospective cross-sectional study. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts, biomicroscopy, and SD-OCT. The findings assessed included vitelliform material, neurosensory detachment, status of external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and retinal pigment epithelium, choroidal excavation, foveal cavitation, choroidal neovascularization, vitreomacular traction, and macular hole. The primary outcome measure was the identification of SD-OCT findings in each vitelliform macular dystrophy stage. Secondary outcomes included the correlations between SD-OCT features and visual acuity changes.
RESULTS: The outer retinal layers (external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone, and retinal pigment epithelium) were found to be more commonly disrupted in Stages 2 to 4 (range: 86%-100%), whereas their absence was more typical of Stage 5 (71%-86%). Vitelliform material was found in 100% of Stages 2 and 3, 93% of Stage 4, and interestingly in 43% of Stage 5. Eyes characterized by vitelliform material showed a greater correlation with higher best-corrected visual acuity than eyes without it (0.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs. 0.80 ± 0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, approximately 20/45 and 20/125 Snellen equivalent, respectively) (t = 3.726, P < 0.05). Moreover, its absence was associated with a best-corrected visual acuity of 0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or worse (approximately 20/63 Snellen equivalent; P < 0.05). Subretinal fluid was more common in Stages 3 and 4 (72.7% and 75%, respectively) than Stages 2 and 5 (P = 0.004). Eyes with subretinal fluid were significantly associated with a visual acuity of 0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or worse (approximately 20/32 Snellen equivalent; P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography assessment primarily indicates an outer retinal layer disruption in Stages 2 to 4, along with the presence of vitelliform material extending into the more advanced clinical stages too. Eyes characterized by the persistence of vitelliform material show better best-corrected visual acuity. Future investigations based on a longitudinal follow-up are warranted to correlate SD-OCT modifications with functional responses to identify SD-OCT indicators for prognostic and therapeutic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28376040     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  9 in total

1.  Natural course of the vitelliform stage in best vitelliform macular dystrophy: a five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Francesco Romano; Alessandro Arrigo; Carlo Di Nunzio; Alessio Buzzotta; Giorgio Alto; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Hyperreflective foci in Stargardt disease: 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Riccardo Sacconi; Francesco Romano; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Quantitative Assessment of Macular Neovascularization in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Alessandro Arrigo; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Optical coherence tomography angiography in best vitelliform macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Ahmad Mirshahi; Alireza Lashay; Ahmad Masoumi; Mojtaba Abrishami
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-16

5.  Correlation of features on OCT with visual acuity and Gass lesion type in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Razek G Coussa; Christopher R Fortenbach; D Brice Critser; Malia M Collins; Budd A Tucker; Robert F Mullins; Elliott H Sohn; Edwin M Stone; Ian C Han
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-07

6.  Clinical and visual electrophysiological characteristics of vitelliform macular dystrophies in the first decade of life.

Authors:  Srikanta Kumar Padhy; Deepika C Parameswarappa; Komal Agarwal; Brijesh Takkar; Shashwat Behera; Bhavik Panchal; Muralidhar Ramappa; Tapas Ranjan Padhi; Subhadra Jalali
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.969

7.  Clinical Correlation Between Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers and Retinal Sensitivity in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Lorenzo Bianco; Alessandro Arrigo; Andrea Saladino; Alessio Antropoli; Adelaide Pina; Alessandro Marchese; Emanuela Aragona; Hassan Farah Rashid; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.048

8.  Tuberous sclerosis complex with Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy: A combined presentation.

Authors:  Abhinav Dhami; P Vijayalakshmi Devi; Muna Bhende
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  Reviewing the Role of Ultra-Widefield Imaging in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Alessandro Marchese; Alessandro Bordato; Maria Pia Manitto; Francesco Bandello; Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2020-03-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.