Literature DB >> 28375581

Mule deer and energy development-Long-term trends of habituation and abundance.

Hall Sawyer1, Nicole M Korfanta2, Ryan M Nielson1,3, Kevin L Monteith2,4, Dale Strickland1,3.   

Abstract

As the extent and intensity of energy development in North America increases, so do disturbances to wildlife and the habitats they rely upon. Impacts to mule deer are of particular concern because some of the largest gas fields in the USA overlap critical winter ranges. Short-term studies of 2-3 years have shown that mule deer and other ungulates avoid energy infrastructure; however, there remains a common perception that ungulates habituate to energy development, and thus, the potential for a demographic effect is low. We used telemetry data from 187 individual deer across a 17-year period, including 2 years predevelopment and 15 years during development, to determine whether mule deer habituated to natural gas development and if their response to disturbance varied with winter severity. Concurrently, we measured abundance of mule deer to indirectly link behavior with demography. Mule deer consistently avoided energy infrastructure through the 15-year period of development and used habitats that were an average of 913 m further from well pads compared with predevelopment patterns of habitat use. Even during the last 3 years of study, when most wells were in production and reclamation efforts underway, mule deer remained >1 km away from well pads. The magnitude of avoidance behavior, however, was mediated by winter severity, where aversion to well pads decreased as winter severity increased. Mule deer abundance declined by 36% during the development period, despite aggressive onsite mitigation efforts (e.g. directional drilling and liquid gathering systems) and a 45% reduction in deer harvest. Our results indicate behavioral effects of energy development on mule deer are long term and may affect population abundance by displacing animals and thereby functionally reducing the amount of available habitat.
© 2017 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  avoidance behavior; disturbance; indirect habitat loss; land-use planning; mitigation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28375581     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  Nitrogen addition pulse has minimal effect in big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) communities on the Pinedale Anticline, Wyoming (USA).

Authors:  Christopher W Beltz; Megan L Mobley; Ingrid C Burke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Where to forage when afraid: Does perceived risk impair use of the foodscape?

Authors:  Samantha P H Dwinnell; Hall Sawyer; Jill E Randall; Jeffrey L Beck; Jennifer S Forbey; Gary L Fralick; Kevin L Monteith
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Population genomics of free-ranging Great Plains white-tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization.

Authors:  Fraser J Combe; Levi Jaster; Andrew Ricketts; David Haukos; Andrew G Hope
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Mapping potential effects of proposed roads on migratory connectivity for a highly mobile herbivore using circuit theory.

Authors:  Timothy J Fullman; Ryan R Wilson; Kyle Joly; David D Gustine; Paul Leonard; Wendy M Loya
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.105

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.