Literature DB >> 28375470

Endoscopic stent suture fixation for prevention of esophageal stent migration during prolonged dilatation for achalasia treatment.

E Rieder, R Asari, M Paireder, J Lenglinger, S F Schoppmann.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare endoscopic stent suture fixation with endoscopic clip attachment or the use of partially covered stents (PCS) regarding their capability to prevent stent migration during prolonged dilatation in achalasia. Large-diameter self-expanding metal stents (30 mm × 80 mm) were placed across the gastroesophageal junction in 11 patients with achalasia. Stent removal was scheduled after 4 to 7 days. To prevent stent dislocation, endoscopic clip attachment, endoscopic stent suture fixation, or PCS were used. The Eckardt score was evaluated before and 6 months after prolonged dilatation. After endoscopic stent suture fixation, no (0/4) sutured stent migrated. When endoscopic clips were used, 80% (4/5) clipped stents migrated (p = 0.02). Of two PCS (n = 2), one migrated and one became embedded leading to difficult stent removal. Technical adverse events were not seen in endoscopic stent suture fixation but were significantly correlated with the use of clips or PCS (r = 0.828, p = 0.02). Overall, 72% of patients were in remission regarding their achalasia symptoms 6 months after prolonged dilatation. Endoscopic suture fixation of esophageal stents but not clip attachment appears to be the best method of preventing early migration of esophageal stents placed at difficult locations such as at the naive gastroesophageal junction.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achalasia; stent fixation; stent migration; stents

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28375470     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dow002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of Stents in the Treatment of Fistula After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ossamu Okazaki; Wanderley M Bernardo; Vitor O Brunaldi; Cesar C de Clemente Junior; Maurício K Minata; Diogo T H de Moura; Thiago F de Souza; Josemberg Marins Campos; Marco Aurélio Santo; Eduardo G H de Moura
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Endoscopic Management of Luminal Strictures: Beyond Dilation.

Authors:  Nader D Daoud; Hassan Ghoz; Obaie Mzaik; Himesh B Zaver; Micah McKinney; Bhaumik Brahmbhatt; Timothy Woodward
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Evaluating the Non-conventional Achalasia Treatment Modalities.

Authors:  Francisco Tustumi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  Endoscopic Stents in the Management of Bariatric Complications: Our Algorithm and Outcomes.

Authors:  Shyam Vedantam; Jay Roberts
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.