| Literature DB >> 28375161 |
David Rotermund1, Jonas Pistor2, Janpeter Hoeffmann3, Tim Schellenberg4, Dmitriy Boll5, Elena Tolstosheeva6, Dieter Gauck7, Heiko Stemmann8, Dagmar Peters-Drolshagen9, Andreas Kurt Kreiter10, Martin Schneider11, Steffen Paul12, Walter Lang13, Klaus Richard Pawelzik1.
Abstract
Implantable neuronal interfaces to the brain are an important keystone for future medical applications. However, entering this field of research is difficult since such an implant requires components from many different areas of technology. Since the complete avoidance of wires is important due to the risk of infections and other long-term problems, means for wirelessly transmitting data and energy are a necessity which adds to the requirements. In recent literature, many high-tech components for such implants are presented with remarkable properties. However, these components are typically not freely available for such a system. Every group needs to re-develop their own solution. This raises the question if it is possible to create a reusable design for an implant and its external base-station, such that it allows other groups to use it as a starting point. In this article, we try to answer this question by presenting a design based exclusively on commercial off-the-shelf components and studying the properties of the resulting system. Following this idea, we present a fully wireless neuronal implant for simultaneously measuring electrocorticography signals at 128 locations from the surface of the brain. All design files are available as open source.Entities:
Keywords: ECoG; neuro-implant; neuro-prosthetic; open hardware; wireless implant
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28375161 PMCID: PMC5421721 DOI: 10.3390/s17040761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) concept of the implant with its base station; (b) overview of the components required for realizing the presented system concept of the wireless energy and data link; (c) proportions and positions of the implant, its power coil as well as the external power coil and antenna.
Figure 2Realization of the wireless module on a 0.15 mm FR4 board with its hand wound coil for the inductive power link.
Figure 3(top) implant prototype: (a) reference electrode; (b) 128 electrodes; (c) 8x Intan Technologies RHA2116; (d) ASIC (Application-specific integrated circuit); (e) 24 MHz clock; (f) radio frequency (RF)-transceiver; (g) inductive energy link. Implant has a weight of g and is 32 mm wide; (h) drawing of the folded implant. The coil has a square shape.
Usage of the IGLOO nano FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) resources for an implant with Intan Technologies RHA or RHD analog front-end. A large portion (up to 33% in the case with Intan RHAs) of these core resources are by optional virtual RHAs/RHDs for testing purposes.
| Resource | Usage (RHA) | Usage (RHD) |
|---|---|---|
| CORE | 5859 of 6144 (95%) | 5236 of 6144 (85%) |
| IO (W/clocks) | 38 of 68 (56%) | 38 of 68 (56%) |
| GLOBAL (Chip + Quadrant) | 6 of 18 (33%) | 6 of 18 (33%) |
| PLL | 0 of 1 (0%) | 0 of 1 (0%) |
| RAM/FIFO | 8 of 8 (100%) | 8 of 8 (100%) |
Figure 4(a) wireless operation distances and according frequencies and (b) primary voltages (shown for two different coils and 100 mW DC transferred power).
Figure 5Data transfer rates for different distances.
Figure 6(a) received signals for a 40 Hz test signal. The amplitude depends on the distance between the stimulating wire and the channel electrode. The different channels are depicted in offset steps of 400 V; (b) noise spectrum for open inputs in the Ringer solution.
Estimated power consumption of the implant’s components.
| Component | Power Consumption |
|---|---|
| Microsemi ZL70102 transceiver | 17 mW (measured) |
| ASIC (Application-specific integrated circuit) | up to 9.44 mW (measured) |
| Clock quartz | 16.5 mW (measured) |
| Intan RHA amplifier arrays | 5 mW (each IC) (measured) |
| DC (direct current)/DC-Converter | 8.5 mW (for 1 RHA), 15 mW (for 8 RHAs), (data-sheet) |
| Texas Instruments inductive power receiver | 10–40 mW (data-sheet) |
Figure 7(a) simulated heat-up; (b) measured temperature increase after power on; (c) measurement setup for testing the heating up of the implant; (d) temperature distribution after 300 s, calculated with a simple FEM (Finite element method) model (COMSOL (Berlin, Germany)). Rectangle shows the implant cross section dimensions.