| Literature DB >> 28374866 |
M Mesolella1, B Iorio1, M Landi1, M Cimmino1, G Ilardi2, M Iengo1, M Mascolo2.
Abstract
This study analysed the immunohistochemical expression of the CAF-1/p60 protein in laryngeal cancers. CAF-1/p60 assumes an independent discriminative and prognostic value in laryngeal neoplasms; the presence of this protein in carcinoma in situ compared with laryngeal precancerous and larynx infiltrating tumours. We assessed the immunohistochemical expression of CAF-1/p60 in 30 cases of moderate and/or severe dysplasia, 30 cases of carcinoma in situ and 30 cases of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCCs). CAF-1/p60 expression increased significantly according to the high index of neoplastic cellular replication; therefore, CAF-1/p60 was overexpressed in neoplastic cells and its moderate-severe expression is correlated with poorer prognosis compared to less expression. In conclusion, overexpression of the CAF-1/p60 protein is related to a risk of higher morbidity and mortality and is a reliable independent prognostic index of laryngeal carcinoma. CAF1-p60 protein overexpression can be used in cancer management as an indicator of malignant evolution, especially in carcinoma in situ. © Copyright by Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy.Entities:
Keywords: CAF-1/p60; Carcinoma in situ; Dysplasia; Laryngeal cancer; Prognostic factor; Tumoural marker
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28374866 PMCID: PMC5384305 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ISSN: 0392-100X Impact factor: 2.124
Fig. 1.A) Laryngeal mucosa with moderat-severe dysplasia and with mild (+) expression of CAF-1/p60; B) Laryngeal mucosa with cancer in situ and with severe (+++) expression of CAF-1/ p60; C- D) High expression (+++) of CAF-1/ p60 in moderately differentiated cancer (G2) and in undifferentiated cancer (G3).
Dysplasia; correlation of CAF-1/p60 expression with surgical treatment and follow-up.
| Case | Histological | CAF1/P60 | First treatment | F-UP | Second | F-UP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | Dysplasia | + | Cordectomy type I | Normal | - | - |
| 10 | Dysplasia | + | Cordectomy type II | Normal | - | - |
| 2 | Dysplasia | + | Cordectomy type I | Relapse | Cordectomy type II | Normal |
Cancer in situ; correlation of CAF-1/p60 expression with surgical treatment and follow-up.
| Cases | Histological | CAF-1/ | First treatment | Follow-up | Second treatment | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Ca in situ | + | Cordectomy type I | Normal | - | - |
| 5 | Ca in situ | + | Cordectomy type II | Normal | - | - |
| 4 | Ca in situ | + | Cordectomy type III | Normal | - | - |
| 4 | Ca in situ | + | Cordectomy Type IV | Normal | - | - |
| 1 | Ca in situ | + | Cordectomy type Va | Normal | - | - |
| 1 | Ca in situ | + | Cordectomy type II | Relapse ca in situ | Cordectomy type IV | Normal |
| 1 | Ca in situ | + | Cordectomy type IV | - | - | |
| 1 | Ca in situ | ++ | Cordectomy type III | Normal | - | - |
| 1 | Ca in situ | ++/+++ | Cordectomy type III | Normal | - | - |
| 1 | Ca in situ | ++/+++ | Cordectomy type III | Progression of disease | TL | Normal |
| 1 | Ca in situ | ++/+++ | Cordectomy type IV | Relapse ca in situ | Cordectomy type Va | Normal |
| 1 | Ca in situ | ++/+++ | Cordectomy type Vd | Progression of disease | SGPL | Normal |
| 1 | Ca in situ | +++ | Cordectomy type III | Suspect of relapse | Excisional biopsy | 4 biopsy |
| 1 | Ca in situ | +++ | Cordectomy type IV | Relapse ca in situ | Cordectomy type Va | Normal |
| 2 | Ca in situ | +++ | Cordectomy type Va | Relapse ca in situ | Cordectomy type Vd | Normal |
| 1 | Ca in situ | +++ | Cordectomy type Va | Suspect of | Excisional biopsy (light | Normal |
| 1 | Ca in situ | +++ | Cordectomy type Vd | - | - |
death
TL = total laryngectomy
SGPL = Supraglottic partial laryngectomy
Infiltrating cancer; correlation of CAF-1/p60 expression with surgical treatment and follow-up.
| Case | Histological | Grading/ | CAF-1 | Surgical | F-UP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LSCC | II/ G2 | +++ | SCPL | † - M+ |
| 2 | LSCC | II/ G2 | ++ | TL | Normal |
| 3 | LSCC | III/ G2-G3 | ++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 4 | LSCC | III/ G2-G3 | ++ | SGPL | † |
| 5 | LSCC | IVa/ G2 | +++ | SCPL | † - M+ |
| 6 | LSCC | IVa/ G2 | ++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 7 | LSCC | IVa/ G2- G3 | ++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 8 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | ++ | SGPL | † for other |
| 9 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | ++ | SGPL | Normal |
| 10 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | ++ | SCPL | † - M+ |
| 11 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | ++ | TL | † for other |
| 12 | LSCC | II/ G2 | ++/+++ | SCPL | † for other |
| 13 | LSCC | IVa/G2- G3 | ++/+++ | SCPL | † for other |
| 14 | LSCC | II/ G2 | ++ | SGPL | Normal |
| 15 | LSCC | III/ G3 | ++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 16 | LSCC | IVa/ G2- G3 | +++ | SGPL | † - M+ |
| 17 | LSCC | III/ G2 | ++ | SGPL | Normal |
| 18 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | +++ | SCPL | † - M+ |
| 19 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | +++ | TL | † - M+ |
| 20 | LSCC | IVa/ G2 | ++ | SGPL | Normal |
| 21 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | +++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 22 | LSCC | III/ G2- G3 | +++ | SGPL | † for other |
| 23 | LSCC | IVa/ G2 | ++ | SCPL | † |
| 24 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | +++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 25 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | +++ | TL | Normal |
| 26 | LSCC | IVa/ G2- G3 | ++/ +++ | SCPL | † - M+ |
| 27 | LSCC | II/ G2 | ++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 28 | LSCC | IVa/ G3 | +++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 29 | LSCC | IVa/ G2- G3 | ++/+++ | SCPL | Normal |
| 30 | LSCC | IVa/ G2- G3 | +++ | TL | † - M+ |
Abbreviations LSCC: squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx; SCPL: supracricoid partial laryngectomy; SGPL: supraglottic partial laryngectomy; TL: total laryngectomy; † death; M+ metastasis
Fig. 2.Analysis of survival; A) disease-specific survival and B) overall survival.
Fig. 3.Univariate analyses of overexpression, staging, grading, treatment strategy, progression and distant metastases.
Fig. 4.Multivariate Cox regression analysis.