| Literature DB >> 28374757 |
Kosmas Sarafidis1, Anastasia Chrysovalantou Chatziioannou2, Agathi Thomaidou1, Helen Gika3, Emmanouel Mikros4, Dimitra Benaki4, Elisavet Diamanti1, Charalampos Agakidis1, Nikolaos Raikos3, Vasiliki Drossou1, Georgios Theodoridis2.
Abstract
Although late-onset sepsis (LOS) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, biomarkers evaluated in LOS lack high diagnostic accuracy. In this prospective, case-control, pilot study, we aimed to determine the metabolic profile of neonates with LOS. Urine samples were collected at the day of initial LOS evaluation, the 3rd and 10th day, thereafter, from 16 septic neonates (9 confirmed and 7 possible LOS cases) and 16 non-septic ones (controls) at respective time points. Urine metabolic profiles were assessed using non-targeted nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Multivariate statistical models with data from either analytical approach showed clear separation between the metabolic profiles of septic neonates (both possible and confirmed) and the controls. Metabolic changes appeared to be related to disease progression. Overall, neonates with confirmed or possible LOS exhibited comparable metabolic profiles indicating similar metabolic alternations upon the onset of clinical manifestations. This methodology therefore enabled the discrimination of neonates with LOS from non-septic individuals, providing potential for further research toward the discovery of LOS-related biomarkers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28374757 PMCID: PMC5379623 DOI: 10.1038/srep45506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic, perinatal and clinical-laboratory characteristics.
| Descriptive variable | Septic neonates | Controls | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All cases (n = 16) | Confirmed sepsis (n = 9) | Possible sepsis (n = 7) | (n = 16) | ||
| Gestational age (weeks, mean ± sd) | 34.7 ± 3.6 | 36 ± 3.1 | 33 ± 3.7 | 35 ± 3.2 | 0.796 |
| Birth weight (g, mean ± sd) | 2427 ± 935 | 2654 ± 987 | 2134 ± 840 | 2438 ± 880 | 0.974 |
| Male sex (n, %) | 7 (43.7) | 4 (44.4) | 3 (42.8) | 4 (25) | 0.457 |
| Preterm (n, %) | 11 (68.8) | 5 (55.5) | 6 (85.7) | 11 (68.8) | 1 |
| Apgar score1 min (mean ± sd)5 min (mean ± sd) | 7.2 ± 1.18.4 ± 0.6 | 7.2 ± 1.38.3 ± 0.7 | 7.3 ± 0.78.5 ± 0.5 | 7.7 ± 0.68.9 ± 0.5 | 0.1280.048 |
| Caesarian section (n, %) | 11 (68.8) | 7 (77.7) | 4 (57.1) | 9 (56.2) | 0.715 |
| Prenatal steroid (n, %) | 9 (56.2) | 3 (33.3) | 6 (85.7) | 8 (50) | 0.724 |
| Small for gestational age (n, %) | 1 (6.2) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (6.2) | 1 |
| Premature rupture of membranes >18 hrs (n, %) | 1 (6.2) | 0 (0) | 1 (14.2) | 1 (6.2) | 1 |
| Time of 1st urine sampling (day, mean ± sd) | 9.7 ± 10.8 | 5.6 ± 1.3 | 15.1 ± 15.3 | 13.1 ± 10.1 | 0.394 |
| Invasive mechanical ventilation (n, %) | 11 (68.7) | 6 (66.6) | 5 (71.4) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
| Inotropes (n, %) | 8 (50) | 4 (44.4) | 4 (57.1) | 0 (0) | 0.002 |
| Antibiotics (n, %) | 16 (100) | 9 (100) | 7 (100) | 5 (31.2) | <0.001 |
| Full enteral feeding (n, %) | 6 (37.5) | 4 (44.4) | 2 (28.6) | 16 (100) | <0.001 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/dL)Day 0Day 1 | 43.6 ± 34.499.5 ± 56.9 | 48.8 ± 43.3106 ± 63.1 | 36.7 ± 18.888.3 ± 49.7 | All <3.19-— | Not applicableNot applicable |
| White blood count (K/μL, mean ± sd) - day 0 | 13.7 ± 10.3 | 13.5 ± 11.6 | 14.1 ± 9.2 | 10.6 ± 2.9 | 0.279 |
| Immature to total neutrophil ratio (>0.2) - day 0 | 6 (37.5) | 3 (33.3) | 3 (48.9) | 0 (0) | 0.017 |
| Platelet count (K/μL) - day 0 | 132 ± 98 | 106 ± 82 | 165 ± 114 | 374 ± 163 | <0.001 |
| Blood lactate (mg/dL) - day 0 | 19.3 ± 6.7 | 21.7 ± 7.8 | 16.1 ± 3.3 | 13 ± 4.2 | 0.007 |
| Blood glucose (mg/dL) - day 0 | 112 ± 44 | 115.5 ± 50 | 108 ± 38 | 91 ± 12 | 0.091 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL)Day 0Day 3 | 0.68 ± 0.260.66 ± 0.19 | 0.65 ± 0.250.66 ± 0.23 | 0.72 ± 0.290.67 ± 0.16 | 0.57 ± 0.140.63 ± 0.1 | 0.2260.716 |
*p-value refers to comparison between all cases of septic neonates and controls (n = 16).
Figure 1PCA scores plots.
First and second component explaining the variation among data are plotted at three time-points D0, D3 and D10. Top Frame: H-NMR data: Samples of DO show clear separation of the two groups (septic patients versus controls). On D3 separation is not as evident, while on D10 samples cluster all together Bottom frame: LC-MS/MS data: Samples of DO and D3 show clear separation of the two groups (septic patients versus controls). On D10 samples cluster all together. The arrow indicates a deceased septic neonate on day 3. Green circles correspond to controls and red circles to sepsis subjects (smaller circles denote possible and large circles confirmed sepsis). Pink correspond to day 3 and light pink to day 10.
Metabolites found by 1H-NMR to have significantly changed in septic neonates at the onset of the disease (D0).
| metabolites | ppm | D0 possible | D0 confirmed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p value | log2fold change | p value | log2fold change | ||
| Maltose | 5.42 | p < 0.05 | 0.83 | p < 0.05 | 1.48 |
| Glucose | 3.28 | p < 0.05 | 1.46 | p < 0.05 | 2.21 |
| Biotin | 2.78 | p < 0.05 | 1.16 | p < 10−2 | 2.28 |
| Methylamine | 2.60 | p < 0.05 | 0.89 | p < 10−2 | 1.77 |
| Unknown | 2.78 | p < 0.05 | 0.78 | p < 10−2 | 1.76 |
| Inosine | 8.35 | p < 10−2 | 0.78 | p < 0.05 | 1.27 |
| Methylguanidine | 2.83 | p < 0.05 | 0.70 | p < 0.05 | 1.11 |
| Creatine | 3.00 | p < 0.05 | 1.95 | p < 0.05 | 3.26 |
| Myo-inositol | 3.55 | p = 0.05 | 0.62 | p < 0.05 | 2.05 |
| Quinolinic acid | 8.03 | p = 0.05 | 0.87 | p < 0.05 | 1.40 |
On D3 and D10 they were all found with no significant statistical alteration between the groups. #Fold change was calculated based on the mean of each group (septic, control) by using the logarithm of the ratio septic/control for every significant metabolite at each time point.
Metabolites found by LC-MS/MS to have significantly changed in septic neonates at the onset of the disease (D0) and their evolution in D3.
| Metabolites | D0 | D3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmed | Possible | Confirmed | Possible | |||||
| p value | log2fold change | p value | log2fold change | p value | log2fold change | p value | log2fold change | |
| Valine | <10−3 | 4.01 | <10−2 | 1.35 | >0.05 | <10−2 | 4.71 | |
| Phenylalanine | <10−2 | 2.91 | <10−2 | 3.30 | >0.05 | <0.05 | 5.65 | |
| <0.05 | 1.27 | <10−2 | 3.55 | <10−2 | 2.75 | >0.05 | ||
| g-aminobutyric acid | =0.05 | 1.09 | <10−2 | 4.61 | >0.05 | >0.05 | ||
| Isoleucine | <10−2 | 2.74 | <10−2 | 2.59 | <10−2 | 7.06 | <10−2 | 4.44 |
| Glutamic acid | =0.05 | 1.92 | <10−2 | 2.66 | >0.05 | >0.05 | ||
| Hypotaurine | =0.05 | 2.59 | <0.05 | 2.53 | >0.05 | >0.05 | ||
| Trimethylamine-N-oxide | <0.05 | −1.98 | <0.05 | −3.46 | <0.05 | −3.06 | <0.05 | −3.03 |
| =0.05 | 1.98 | =10−3 | 1.94 | |||||
| Fumaric acid | <10−2 | −2.09 | =0.05 | −1.10 | <10−3 | −3.41 | >0.05 | |
| Lactic acid | <0.05 | 2.56 | <10−2 | 3.37 | >0.05 | <0.05 | 5.04 | |
| Hippuric acid | =0.05 | −2.14 | <0.05 | −1.46 | >0.05 | >0.05 | ||
| <10−2 | 1.06 | <0.05 | 3.58 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |||
| Nicotinamide | <10−2 | −3.38 | <10−2 | −2.75 | <10−2 | −2.47 | <0.05 | −2.67 |
| Riboflavine | =0.05 | −0.79 | <10−2 | −1.67 | <10−2 | −5.57 | >0.05 | |
| Thiamine | <0.05 | −1.61 | =0.05 | −0.72 | <0.05 | −1.28 | >0.05 | |
| <10−2 | 1.34 | <10−2 | 2.74 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |||
On D10 they were all found with no significant statistical alteration between the groups.
*Parallel significant change of the metabolite on 1H-NMR data.
Log2fold change was calculated based on the mean of each group (control, septic) by using the logarithm (base 2) of the ratio septic/control for every significant metabolite at each time point.
Figure 2Higher impact pathways involving significant metabolites of both techniques as resulted from the online web software MetaboAnalyst.
The significance of a model increases in the y-axis. The color bar indicates the p-value of the pathway; darker color corresponds to more significant p-value (smaller value).